Elastography of the breast: A prospective study of 122 lesions;Élastosonographie du sein: Étude prospective de 122 lésions

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 88, Issue 5 C1, 2007, Pages 657-662

  Tardivon, A ^a   El Khoury, C ^a   Thibault, F ^a   Wyler, A ^a   Barreau, B ^a   Neuenschwander, S ^a  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast, neoplasms; Breast, ultrasound; Sonography, elastography; Ultrasound, technology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; BREAST SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ELASTOGRAPHY; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MORPHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST TUMOR; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; PALPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

BREAST DISEASES; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ELASTICITY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PALPATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 34249883565     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0221-0363(07)89872-6     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:1260-5.
2. Baker JA, Soo M. Breast US: assessment of technical quality and image interpretation. Radiology 2002;223:229-38.
3. Bosch AM, Kessels AGH, Beets GL, et al. Interexamination variation of whole breast ultrasound. Br J Radiol 2003;76: 328-31.
4. Skaane P, Olsen JB, Sager EM, et al. Variability in the interpretation of ultrasonography in patients with palpable non-calcified breast tumors. Acta Radiol 1999;40:169-75.
5. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 2006;239:385-91.
6. Dickinson RJ, Hill CR. Measurement of soft tissue motion using correlation between A-scans. Ultrasound Med Biol 1982;8:263-71.
7. Einsencher A, Schweg-Toffler E, Pelletier G, Jacquemard P. La palpation échographique rythmée : échosismographie. Une nouvelle technique de différenciation des tumeurs bénignes et malignes par l'étude ultrasonore de l'élasticité tissulaire. J Radiol 1983;64:255-61.
8. Ophir J, Cespedes EI, Ponneanti H, Yazdi Y, Li X. Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissue. Ultrasonic Imaging 1991;13:111-34.
9. Krouskop TA, Dougherty BS, Vinson FS. A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurement of the mechanical properties of soft tissue. J Rehabil Res Dev 1987;24:1-8.
10. nd extra issue separate volume.
11. e édition américaine, Société Française de Radiologie, 2004.
12. Giuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, Baldassarre S. Elastography in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: preliminary report. Radiol Med 2005;110:69-76
13. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:341-50.
14. Thomas A, Fischer T, Frey H, et al. Real-time elastography-an advanced method of ultrasound: first results in 108 patients with breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:335-40.
15. Locatelli M, Chervesani R, Rizzatto G. Real-time ultrasound elastography: diagnostic tool or electronic gadget? Eur Radiol 2005, supplement 1 to Vol 15 (ECR 2005, book of abtracts): abstract B-0255, page 139.
16. Bercoff J, M. Tanter M, Fink M. Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 2004;51:396-409.