Reimplantation with a conventional length electrode following residual hearing loss in four hybrid implant recipients

Cochlear Implants International

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 148-155

  Carlson, Matthew L ^a   Archibald, David J ^a   Gifford, Rene H ^a   Driscoll, Colin L W ^a   Beatty, Charles W ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Electroacoustic hearing

Indexed keywords

AGED; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRODE IMPLANT; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REIMPLANTATION; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; REPLANTATION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 84861494374     PISSN: 14670100     EISSN: 17547628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/1754762811Y.0000000003     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Adunka O., Kiefer J., Unkelbach M.H., Radeloff A., GstoettnerW. 2005. Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli. Clinical Otolaryngology, 30: 121-127. BKB-SIN User Manual. Etymotic Available from: http://www. etymotic.com/pdf/bkbsin-user-manual.pdf [accessed 2010Dec 16].
2. Cervera-Paz F.J., Linthicum F.H., Jr. 2005. Cochlear wall erosion after cochlear implantation. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 114: 543-546.
3. ClarkG.M., Shute S.A., Shepherd R.K., Carter T.D. 1995. Cochlear implantation: osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance, and residual hearing. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 166: 40-42.
4. Eshraghi A.A., Van de Water T.R. 2006. Cochlear implantation trauma and noise-induced hearing loss: apoptosis and therapeutic strategies. The Anatomical Record, 288: 473-481.
5. Fitzgerald M.B., Sagi E., Jackson M., Shapiro W.H., Roland J.T. Jr, Waltzman S.B., Svirsky M.A. 2008. Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing. Otology and Neurotology, 29: 168-173.
6. Gani M., Valentini G., Sigrist A., Kos M.I., Boex C. 2007. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 8: 69-83.
7. Gantz B.J., Hansen M.R., Turner C.W., Oleson J.J., Reiss L.A., Parkinson A.J. 2009. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 14(Suppl 1): 32-38.
8. Gantz B.J., Turner C.W. 2003. Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. The Laryngoscope, 113: 1726-1730.
9. Gantz B.J., Turner C. 2004. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 124: 344-347.
10. Gantz B.J., Turner C., Gfeller K.E., Lowder M.W. 2005. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. The Laryngoscope, 115: 796-802.
11. Gfeller K.E., Olszewski C., Turner C., Gantz B., Oleson J. 2006. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiology and Neuro-otology, 11(Suppl 1): 12-15.
12. Gifford R.H., Dorman M.F., Shallop J.K., Sydlowski S.A. 2010. Evidence for the expansion of adult cochlear implant candidacy. Ear and Hearing, 31: 186-194.
13. Gstoettner W., Kiefer J., Baumgartner W.D., Pok S., Peters S., Adunka O. 2004. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 124: 348-352.
14. James C., Albegger K., Battmer R., Burdo S., Deggouj N., Deguine O., Dillier N., Gersdorff M., Lasig R., Lenarz T., Rodriguez M.M., Mondain M., Offeciers E., Macias A.R., Ramsden R., Sterkers O., Von Wallenberg E., Weber B., Fraysse B. 2005. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 125: 481-491.
15. Kawano A., Seldon H.L., Clark G.M., Ramsden R.T., Raine C.H. 1998. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Oto-laryngologica, 118: 313-326.
16. Nelson P.B., Jin S.H., Carney A.E., Nelson D.A. 2003. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113: 961-968.
17. Qin M.K., Oxenham A.J. 2003. Effects of simulated cochlearimplant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114: 446-454.
18. Roland P.S., Wright C.G. 2006. Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation: mechanisms of insertional trauma. Advances in Oto-rhino-laryngology, 64: 11-30.
19. Rubinstein J.T., ParkinsonW.S., Tyler R.S., Gantz B. 1999. Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. The American Journal of Otology, 20: 445-52.
20. Somdas M.A., Li P.M., Whiten D.M., Eddington D.K., Nadol J.B. Jr. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of new bone and fibrous tissue in the cochlea following cochlear implantation in the human. Audiology & Neuro-otology, 12: 277-284.
21. Spoendlin H. 1984. Factors inducing retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 112: 76-82.
22. Sugawara M., Corfas G., Liberman M.C. 2005. Influence of supporting cells on neuronal degeneration after hair cell loss. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 6: 136-147.
23. Thornton A.R., Raffin M.J. 1978. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 21: 507-518.
24. Turner C.W., Gantz B.J., Vidal C., Behrens A., Henry B.A. 2004. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115: 1729-1735.