Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing

Otology and Neurotology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 168-173

  Fitzgerald, Matthew B ^a   Sagi, Elad ^a   Jackson, Michael ^a   Shapiro, William H ^a   Roland Jr , J Thomas ^a   Waltzman, Susan B ^a   Svirsky, Mario A ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Electroacoustic; Hybrid; Pitch scaling; Reimplantation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CASE REPORT; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORD RECOGNITION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; ELECTRODES; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MALE; PITCH PERCEPTION; REPLANTATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 38649126942     PISSN: 15317129     EISSN: 15374505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31815c4875     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005;115:796-802.
2. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1729-35.
3. Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W-D, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:348-52.
4. Marsh MA, Xu J, Blamey PJ, et al. Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. Am J Otol 1993;14:386-91.
5. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, et al. CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002;3:332-50.
6. Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, O'Leary S. Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol Neurootol 2004;9:163-72.
7. Levitt H. Decision theory, signal-detection theory, and psychophysics. In: David EE, Denes PB, eds. Human Communication: A Unified View. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1972:114-74.
8. Balkany T, Menapace C, Hazard L, et al. Nucleus Freedom North American clinical trial. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:757-62.
9. Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB. Is word recognition correlated with the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 2005;115:672-7.
10. Reiss LA, Turner CW, Erenberg SR, Gantz BJ. Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2007;8:241-57.
11. Svirsky MA, Silveira A, Neuburger H, Teoh S-W, Suárez H. Long-term auditory adaptation to a modified peripheral frequency map. Acta Otolaryngol 2004;124:381-6.
12. Busby PA, Whitford LA, Blamey PJ, Richardson LM, Clark GM. Pitch perception for multiple modes of stimulation using the Cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:2658-69.