Effectiveness of semi-quantitative multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of malignancy in complex adnexal masses: Radiological and pathological correlation

European Radiology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 880-890

  Bernardin, Livia ^a   Dilks, Philip ^b   Liyanage, Sidath ^b   Miquel, Marc E ^b   Sahdev, Anju ^b   Rockall, Andrea ^b  

^a Policlinico GB Rossi   (Italy)

^b ST BARTHOLOMEW S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adnexal mass; Characterisation; Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE MRI); Indeterminate; Ovarian cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANDROBLASTOMA; BRENNER TUMOR; CLEAR CELL CARCINOMA; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CYSTADENOCARCINOMA; CYSTADENOMA; ENDOMETRIOID CARCINOMA; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRANULOSA CELL TUMOR; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; LUTEOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METASTASIS; MIXED MULLERIAN TUMOR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY ADENOCARCINOMA; PAPILLOMA; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TERATOMA;

ADNEXAL DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84861460217     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: 14321084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2331-z     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Office for National Statistics (2011) Cancer incidence in the UK, 2006-2008 Available via http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/cancer-unit/cancer- incidence-and-mortality/2006-2008/cancer-incidence-andmortality- in-the-uk-2006-2008.pdf Accessed 16 July 2011
2. Thomassin-Naggara I, Bazot M, Darai E, Callard P, Thomassin J, Cuenod CA (2008) Epithelial ovarian tumors: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 248:148-159
3. Davies AP, Jacobs I, Woolas R, Fish A, Oram D (1993) The adnexal mass: benign or malignant? Evaluation of a risk of malignancy index. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:927-931
4. Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen P, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1297-1304
5. Obeidat BR, Amarin ZO, Latimer JA, Crawford RA (2004) Risk of malignancy index in the preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 85:255-258
6. Spencer JA, Forstner R, Cunha TM, Kinkel K (2010) ESUR guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach. Eur Radiol 20:25-35
7. Adusumilli S, Hussain HK, Caoili EM et al (2006) MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexalmasses. AJRAmJ Roentgenol 187:732-740
8. Van Trappen PO, Rufford BD, Mills TD et al (2007) Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: risk of malignancy index, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and radioimmunoscintigraphy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:61-67
9. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV et al (2000) Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging- multivariate analysis. Radiology 214:39-46
10. Bharwani N, Reznek RH, Rockall AG (2011) Ovarian cancer management: the role of imaging and diagnostic challenges. Eur J Radiol 78:41-51
11. Imaoka I, Wada A, Kaji Y et al (2006) Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses. Radiographics 26:1431-1448
12. Guerra A, Cunha TM, Felix A (2008) Magnetic resonance evaluation of adnexal masses. Acta Radiol 49:700-709
13. Bent CL, Sahdev A, Rockall AG, Singh N, Sohaib SA, Reznek RH (2009) MRI appearances of borderline ovarian tumours. Clin Radiol 64:430-438
14. Bazot M, Nassar-Slaba J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Darai E (2006) MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology. Eur Radiol 16:2687-2699
15. Bakir B, Bakan S, Tunaci M et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexial masses: is it useful in the differential diagnosis? Br J Radiol 84:600-611
16. Sarty GE, Kendall EJ, Loewy J, Dhir A, Olatunbosun OA, Pierson RA (2004) Magnetic resonance diffusion imaging of ovarian masses: a first experience with 12 cases. MAGMA 16:182-193
17. Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H et al (2005) Diffusionweighted echo-planar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:271-278
18. Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA et al (2009) Contribution of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for predicting benignity of complex adnexal masses. Eur Radiol 19:1544-1552
19. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H (2010) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of ovarian tumors: differentiation of benign and malignant solid components of ovarian masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 34:173-176
20. Thomassin-Naggara I, Toussaint I, Perrot N et al (2011) Characterization of complex adnexal masses: value of adding perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MR imaging to conventional MR imaging. Radiology 258:793-803
21. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215:267-279
22. Ocak I, Bernardo M, Metzger G et al (2007) Dynamic contrastenhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:849
23. Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Nassar-Slaba J, Cortez A, Marsault C, Bazot M (2007) Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:236-242
24. Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:111-120
25. Dilks P, Narayanan P, Reznek R, Sahdev A, Rockall A (2010) Can quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI independently characterize an ovarian mass? Eur Radiol 20:2176-2183
26. The Royal College of Radiologists (2006) Recommendations for Cross-Sectional Imaging in Cancer Management: Computed Tomography - CT- Magnetic Resonance Imaging - MRI - Positron Emission Tomography - PET-CT Available via http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/oncology/pdf/Cross-Sectional-Imaging-12.pdf Accessed 27 October 2011