Can quantitative dynamic contrastenhanced MRI independently characterize an ovarian mass?

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2176-2183

  Dilks, Philip ^a   Narayanan, Priya ^b   Reznek, Rodney ^c   Sahdev, Anju ^a   Rockall, Andrea ^a  

^a BARTS HEALTH NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^c QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adnexal mass; Borderline ovarian cancer; Indeterminate; Ovarian cancer; Quantitative dynamic contrastenhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

CA 125 ANTIGEN; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOTERATE MEGLUMINE; MEGLUMINE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADNEXA DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACT; ASCITES; BENIGN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; METASTASIS; OVARY CYST; PERITONEAL CAVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLID TUMOR; TUMOR VOLUME; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY TUMOR; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEGLUMINE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; OVARIAN NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957961872     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1795-6     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Office for National Statistics (2009) Mortality statistics. Deaths registered in 2007. Available via http://www.statistics.gov. uk/downloads/theme-health/DR2007/DR-07-2007.pdf. Accessed 29 Jan 2010
2. Curtin JP (1994) Management of the adnexal mass. Gynecol Oncol 55: S42-S46
3. Report of the Ultrasonography Task Force (1991) Gynecological Sonography. JAMA 265:2851-2855
4. Kinkel K, Lu Y, Mehdizade A, Pelte MF, Hricak H (2005) Indeterminate ovarian mass at US: incremental value of second imaging test for characterization-metaanalysis and Bayesian analysis. Radiology 236:85-94
5. Strigini FA, Gadducci A, Del Bravo B, Ferdeghini M, Genazzani AR (1996) Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow imaging, and serum ca125 assay in pre and post menopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 61:68-72
6. Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, Kadoch O et al (1998) Laparoscopic management of organic ovarian cysts: is there a place for frozen section diagnosis? Hum Reprod 13:324-329
7. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Piras B, Paoletti AM, Melis GB (2005) Ultrasonography and color Dopplerbased triage for adnexal masses to provide the most appropriate surgical approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:401-406
8. Obeidat BR, Amarin ZO, Latimer JA et al (2004) Risk of malignancy index in the preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses. Int J Gynecol Obstet 85:255-258
9. Sohaib SA, Mills TD, Sahdev A, Webb JA, Vantrappen PO, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH (2005) The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol 60:340-348
10. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV et al (2000) Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate analysis. Radiology 214:39-46
11. Imaoka I, Wada A, Kaji Y, Hayashi T, Hayashi M, Matsuo M, Sugimura K (2006) Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses. Radiographics 126:1431-1448
12. Funt SA, Hann LE (2002) Detection and characterization of adnexal masses. Radiol Clin North Am 40:591-608
13. Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen P, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH (2003) Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 180:1297-1304
14. Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E, Nassar-Slaba J, Cortez A, Marsault C, Bazot M (2007) Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:236-242
15. Adusumilli S, Hussain HK, Caoili EM, Weadock WJ, Murray JP, Johnson TD, Chen Q, Desjardins B (2006) MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. Am J Roentgenol 187:732-740
16. Van Vierzen PB, Massuger LF, Ruys SH, Barentsz JO (1998) Borderline ovarian malignancy: ultrasound and fast dynamic MR findings. Eur J Radiol 28:136-142
17. Spencer JA, Forstner R, Cunha TM, Kinkel K (2009) on behalf of the ESUR Female Imaging Sub-Committee. ESUR guidelines for MR imaging of the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass: an algorithmic approach. Eur Radiol 20:25-35
18. Newatia A, Khatri G, Friedman B, Hines J (2007) Subtraction imaging. Applications for non-vascular. MRI Am J Roentgenol 188:1018-1025
19. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner WE, Gieseke J, Schild HH (1999) Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 211:101-110
20. Ren J, Huan Y, Wang H, Chang YJ, Zhao HT, Ge YL, Liu Y, Yang Y (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic carcinoma: correlation with angiogenesis. Clin Radiol 63:153-159
21. Ho VB, Allen SF, Hood MN, Choyke PL (2002) Renal masses: quantitative assessment of enhancement with dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 224:695-700
22. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner C, Kempe A, Wardelmann E, Hocke A, Maringa M, Pfeifer U, Krebs D, Schild HH (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215:267-279
23. Ocak I, Bernardo M, Metzger G, Barrett T, Pinto P, Albert PS, Choyke PL (2007) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer at 3 T: a study of pharmacokinetic parameters. Am J Roentgenol 189:849
24. Thomassin-Naggara I, Bazot M, Daraï E, Callard P, Thomassin J, Cuenod CA (2008) Epithelial ovarian tumors: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 248:148-159
25. Thomassin-Naggara I, Darai E, Cuenod CA, Rouzier R, Callard P, Bazot M (2008) Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumours. J Magn Reson Imaging 28:111-120
26. Tempfer CB, Polterauer S, Bentz EK et al (2007) Accuracy of intraoperative frozen section analysis in borderline tumours of the ovary: a retrospective analysis of 96 cases and review of the literature. Gynaecol Oncol 107:248-252
27. Taskiran C, Erdem O, Onan A, Bozkurt N, Yaman-Tunc S, Ataoglu O, Guner H (2008) The role of frozen section evaluation in the diagnosis of an adnexal mass. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18:235-240
28. Bazot M, Nassar-Slaba J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Cortez A, Uzan S, Daraï E (2006) MR imaging compared with intraoperative frozen-section examination for the diagnosis of adnexal tumors; correlation with final histology. Eur Radiol 16:2687-2699