MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 187, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 732-740

  Adusumilli, Saroja ^a   Hussain, Hero K ^a   Caoili, Elaine M ^a   Weadock, William J ^a   Murray, John P ^a   Johnson, Timothy D ^a   Chen, Qixuan ^a   Desjardins, Benoit ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Adnexal masses; MRI; Obstetric and gynecologic imaging; Pelvic imaging; Reproductive organ imaging; Sonography

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADIPOSE TISSUE; ADNEXA DISEASE; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD ANALYSIS; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY TUMOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERUS TUMOR; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM; FEMALE GENITAL TRACT TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOLOGY;

ADNEXA UTERI; ADNEXAL DISEASES; ADOLESCENT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GENITAL NEOPLASMS, FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33748444935     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0905     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. DiSantis DJ, Scatarige JC, Kemp G, Given FT, Hsiu JG, Cramer MS. A prospective evaluation of transvaginal sonography for detection of ovarian disease. AJR 1993; 161:91-94
2. Funt SA, Hann LE. Detection and characterization of adnexal masses. Radiol Clin North Am 2002; 40:591-608
3. Hricak H, Chen M, Coakley FV, et al. Complex adnexal masses: detection and characterization with MR imaging-multivariate analysis. Radiology 2000; 214:39-46
4. Jain KA. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathologic findings. Radiology 1994; 191:63-67
5. Scoutt LM, McCarthy SM, Lange R, Bourque A, Schwartz PE. MR evaluation of clinically suspected adnexal masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994; 18:609-618
6. Weinreb JC, Barkoff ND, Megibow A, Demopoulos R. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate. AJR 1990; 154:295-299
7. Sohaib SA, Sahdev A, Van Trappen P, Jacobs IJ, Reznek RH. Characterization of adnexal mass lesions on MR imaging. AJR 2003; 180:1297-1304
8. Yamashita Y, Hatanaka Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. Characterization of sonographically indeterminate ovarian tumors with MR imaging: a logistic regression analysis. Acta Radiol 1997; 38:572-577
9. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Hatanaka Y, et al. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194:557-565
10. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Talerman A, Dunton C. Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:465-471
11. Outwater EK, Dunton CJ. Imaging of the ovary and adnexa: clinical issues and applications of MR imaging. Radiology 1995; 194:1-18
12. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Kim B, Chiowanich P, Blasbalg R, Kilger A. Ovarian Brenner tumors: MR imaging characteristics. Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 16:1147-1153
13. Siegelman ES, Outwater EK. Tissue characterization in the female pelvis by means of MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 212:5-18
14. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2002:434-435
15. Strigini FA, Gadducci A, Del Bravo B, Ferdeghini M, Genazzani AR. Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses with transvaginal sonography, color flow imaging, and serum CA 125 assay in pre- and postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 61:68-72
16. Baltarowich OH, Kurtz AB, Pennell RG, Needleman L, Vilaro MM, Goldberg BB. Pitfalls in the sonographic diagnosis of uterine fibroids. AJR 1988; 151:725-728
17. Caoili EM, Hertzberg BS, Kliewer MA, DeLong D, Bowie JD. Refractory shadowing from pelvic masses on sonography: a useful diagnostic sign for uterine leiomyomas. AJR 2000; 174:97-101
18. Kim JC, Kim SS, Park JY. "Bridging vascular sign" in the MR diagnosis of exophytic uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24:57-60
19. Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M, Yoshida M, Kitagaki H, Sugimura K. MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. RadioGraphics 2003; 23:1401-1421
20. Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH. Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 1992; 183:795-800
21. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002; 223:248-254
22. Kurachi H, Murakami T, Nakamura H, et al. Imaging of peritoneal pseudocysts: value of MR imaging compared with sonography and CT. AJR 1993; 161:589-591
23. Kier R, Smith RC, McCarthy SM. Value of lipid- and water-suppression MR images in distinguishing between blood and lipid within ovarian masses. AJR 1992; 158:321-325
24. Stevens SK, Hricak H, Campos Z. Teratomas versus cystic hemorrhagic adnexal lesions: differentiation with proton-selective fat-saturation MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 186:481-488
25. Outwater EK, Huang AB, Dunton CJ, Talerman A, Capuzzi DM. Papillary projections in ovarian neoplasms: appearance on MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7:689-695
26. Van Vierzen PB, Massuger LF, Ruys SH, Barentsz JO. Borderline ovarian malignancy: ultrasound and fast dynamic MR findings. Eur J Radiol 1998; 28:136-142
27. Jain KA, Jeffrey RB Jr. Evaluation of pelvic masses with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1994; 13:845-853