Value of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing between ovarian fibroma and subserous uterine leiomyoma

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 236-242

  Thomassin Naggara, Isabelle ^a,b   Daraï, Emile ^a,b   Nassar Slaba, Jinane ^a,b   Cortez, Annie ^a,b   Marsault, Claude ^a,b   Bazot, Marc ^a,b  

^a HÔPITAL TENON   (France)

^b ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE HÔPITAUX DE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

DCE MRI; Ovarian fibroma; Uterine leiomyoma

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

ARTERIAL VESSELS; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED; DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARIAN FIBROMA; OVARIAN TISSUE; SIGNAL INTENSITIES; T1-WEIGHTED; TIME-INTENSITY CURVES; UTERINE LEIOMYOMAS;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OVARY; OVARY FIBROMA; OVARY TUMOR; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEROSA; UTERUS MYOMA;

EID: 34147110882     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000237810.88251.9e     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Prat J, Scully R. Cellular fibromas and fibrosarcomas of the ovary: a comparative clinicopathologic analysis of seventeen cases. Cancer. 1981;47:2663-2670.
2. Athey PA, Malone RS. Sonography of ovarian fibromas/thecomas. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6:431-436.
3. Bazot M, Ghossain MA, Buy JN, et al. Fibrothecomas of the ovary: CT and US findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;17:754-759.
4. Atri M, Bret NS, Aldis P, et al. Endovaginal sonographic appearance of benign ovarian masses. Radiographics. 1994;14:747-760.
5. Stephenson W, Laing F. Sonography of ovarian fibromas. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;144:1239-1240.
6. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sciot C, et al. Epithelial tumors of the ovary: CT findings and correlation with US. Radiology. 1991;178:811-818.
7. Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Moss AA, et al. Cystic teratoma of the ovary: CT detection. Radiology. 1989;171:697-701.
8. Troiano R, Lazzarini KM, Scoutt L, et al. Fibroma and fibrothecoma of the ovary: MR imaging findings. Radiology. 1997;204:795-798.
9. Weinreb JC, Barkoff ND, Megibow A, et al. The value of MR imaging in distinguishing leiomyomas from other solid pelvic masses when sonography is indeterminate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:295-299.
10. Scully RE. Ovarian tumors: a review. Am J Pathol. 1977;87:686-720.
11. Siegelman ES, Outwater EK. Tissue characterization in female pelvis by means of MR imaging. Radiology. 1999;212:5-18.
12. Outwater EK, Siegelman E, Talerman A, et al. Ovarian fibromas and cystadenofibromas: MRI features of the fibrous component. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:465-471.
13. Gargano G, De Lena M, Zito F, et al. Ovarian fibroma: our experience of 34 cases. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24:429-432.
14. Kojima T, Ishiko O, Ichimura T, et al. The usefulness and limits of magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of pelvic tumors. Oncol Rep. 2001;8:867-869.
15. Jones HW, Jones GS. Novak's Textbook of Gynecology Chapter IX. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins; 1988:582-584.
16. Bazot M, Ghossain MA, Buy JN, et al. Fibrothecomas of the ovary: CT and US findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993;17:754-759.
17. Altemus R, Charles D, Yoder VE. Conventional hysterosalpingography used in the evaluation of sterility problems. A critical analysis. Fertil Steril. 1967;18:713-718.
18. Karlsson S, Jonsson K. Angiography of the ovarian artery in adnexal lesions. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh). 1980;21:739-746.
19. Lang WR. Gynecologic examination of the immature and maturing female. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1967;142:618-622.