The new purposivism

Supreme Court Review

Volumn 2011, Issue , 2011, Pages 113-182

  Manning, John F ^a  

^a HARVARD LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861415118     PISSN: 00819557     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1086/665584     Document Type: Review

References (436)

1. 143 US 457 (1892).
2. John F. Manning, Second-Generation Textualism, 98 Cal L Rev 1287, 1312-14 (2010).
3. Clinton v New York, 524 US 417, 428-29 (1998).
4. Lewis v United States, 523 US 155, 160 (1998).
5. Daniel J. Meltzer, The Supreme Court's Judicial Passivity, 2002 Supreme Court Review 343, 362-68.
6. Wyeth v Levine, 555 US 555, 601-02 (2009).
7. Thomas W. Merrill, Textualism and the Future of the Chevron Doctrine, 72 Wash U L Q 351, 351 (1994).
8. Michael P. Van Alstine, Dynamic treaty interpretation, 146 U Pa L Rev 687, 717, (1998)
9. Merrill, 72 Wash U L Q at 356.
10. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v Mortier, 501 US 597, 620 (1991).
11. Merrill, 72 Wash U L Q at 365-66.
12. United States v Katz, 271 US 354, 357 (1926).
13. Max Radin, Statutory Interpretation, 43 Harv L Rev 863, 876 (1930).
14. Frederick M. Schauer, Playing by the Rules: A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision-Making in Law and in Life 16-37 (1991).
15. Frank H. Easterbrook, Statutes' Domains, 50 U Chi L Rev 533, 546 (1983).
16. Robert E. Keeton, Statutory Analogy, Purpose, and Policy in Legal Reasoning: Live Lobsters and a Tiger Cub in the Park, 52 Md L Rev 1192, 1205 (1993).
17. Easterbrook, 50 U Chi L Rev at 535.
18. 131 S Ct 1259 (2011).
19. 5 USC § 552(b)(2).
20. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1266.
21. 131 S Ct 2205 (2011).
22. 42 USC § 1988(b).
23. Vice, 131 S Ct at 2213-15.
24. Abbe R. Gluck, The States as Laboratories of Statutory Interpretation: Methodological Consensus and the New Modified Textualism, 119 Yale L J 1750, 1758 (2010).
25. William N. Eskridge Jr., Textualism: The Unknown Ideal? 96 Mich L Rev 1509, 1512 (1998).
26. Jonathan T. Molot, The Rise and Fall of Textualism, 106 Colum L Rev 1, 38 (2006).
27. Antonin Scalia, Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws, in Amy Gutmann, ed, A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law 3, 29-37.
28. Henry M. Hart Jr. and Albert M. Sacks, The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law 1124 (Foundation, 1958).
29. US Const, Art I, § 8, cl 18.
30. Whitman v American Trucking Associations, 531 US 457, 474-75 (2001).
31. Chevron USA, Inc. v Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 US 837, 844 (1984).
32. Heydon's Case, 76 Eng Rep 637 (KB 1584)
33. William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England 62 (1765).
34. James McCauley Landis, Statutes and the Sources of Law, in Roscoe Pound, ed, Harvard Legal Essays 213, 214-18 (Ayer, 1934).
35. Cass R. Sunstein, Interpreting Statutes in the Regulatory State, 103 Harv L Rev 405, 415 (1989).
36. Richard A. Posner, Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statutes and the Constitution, 37 Case W Res L Rev 179, 189 (1986).
37. Textualism and the Equity of the Statute, 101 Colum L Rev 1, 58-105 (2001).
38. William N. Eskridge Jr., All About Words: Early Understandings of the "Judicial Power" in Statutory Interpretation, 1776-1806, 101 Colum L Rev 990 (2001).
39. Philbrook v Glodgett, 421 US 707, 713 (1975).
40. United States v American Trucking Associations, 310 US 534, 542 (1940).
41. ICC v Baird, 194 US 25, 38 (1904).
42. Pennock v Dialogue, 27 US (2 Pet) 1, 21 (1829).
43. United States v Fisher, 6 US (2 Cranch) 358, 386 (1805).
44. Pennington v Coxe, 6 US (2 Cranch) 33, 52 (1804).
45. Felix Frankfurter, Some Reflections on the Reading of Statutes, 47 Colum L Rev 527, 538-39 (1947).
46. United States v American Trucking Associations, 310 US 534, 543 (1940).
47. Frederick Schauer, Statutory Construction and the Coordinating Function of Plain Meaning, 1990 Supreme Court Review 231, 236.
48. Treat v White, 181 US 264, 267-68 (1901).
49. United States v Goldenberg, 168 US 95, 102-03 (1897).
50. United Steelworkers of America v Weber, 443 US 193, 201-07 (1979).
51. Keifer & Keifer v Reconstruction Finance Corp., 306 US 381, 389 (1939).
52. United States v Katz, 271 US 354, 357 (1926).
53. 143 US 457 (1892).
54. Holy Trinity, 143 US at 458.
55. Holy Trinity, 143 US at 459.
56. Richard A. Posner, The Problems of Jurisprudence 268 (Harvard, 1990).
57. L. Fuller, The Case of the Speluncean Explorers, 62 Harv L Rev 616, 625-26 (1949).
58. 310 US 534 (1940).
59. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1237.
60. American Trucking, 310 US at 543-44.
61. Jorge L. Carro and Andrew R. Braunn, The U.S. Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative Histories: A Statistical Analysis, 22 Jurimetrics J 294, 302-03 (1982).
62. Public Citizen v U.S. Department of Justice, 491 US 440, 452-54 (1989).
63. California Federal Savings & Loan Association v Guerra, 479 US 272, 284 (1987).
64. Anderson Bros. Ford v Valencia, 452 US 205, 222 n 20 (1981).
65. Train v Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc., 426 US 1, 10 (1976).
66. United Housing Foundation, Inc. v Forman, 421 US 837, 849 (1975).
67. National Woodwork Manufacturers Association v NLRB, 386 US 612, 620 (1967).
68. United States v Public Utility Commission of California, 345 US 295, 315 (1953).
69. Johansen v United States, 343 US 427, 431 (1952).
70. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v Juneau Spruce Corp., 342 US 237, 243 (1952).
71. Manning, 98 Cal L Rev at 1312-14.
72. Philip P. Frickey, From the Big Sleep to the Big Heat: The Revival of Theory in Statutory Interpretation, 77 Minn L Rev 241, 254-56 (1992).
73. William N. Eskridge Jr., The New Textualism, 37 UCLA L Rev 621, 640-56 (1991).
74. Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation at 34.
75. Begier v IRS, 496 US 53, 68 (1990).
76. Wyeth v Levine, 129 S Ct 1187, 1215-16 (2009).
77. Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v United Mine Workers of America, District 17, 531 US 57, 68-69 (2000).
78. Babbitt v Sweet Home Chapter of Committees for a Great Oregon, 515 US 687, 726 (1995).
79. Daniel A. Farber and Philip P. Frickey, Law and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction (Chicago, 1991).
80. McNollgast, Legislative Intent: The Use of Positive Political Theory in Statutory Interpretation, 57 L & Contemp Probs 3, 24-25 (1994).
81. Daniel B. Rodriguez and Barry R.Weingast, The Positive Political Theory of Legislative History: The 1964 Civil Rights Act and Its Interpretation, 151 U Pa L Rev 1417 (2003).
82. Nicholas S. Zeppos, Legislative History and the Interpretation of Statutes: Toward a Fact-Finding Model of Statutory Interpretation, 76 Va L Rev 1295, 1307-08 (1990).
83. Eskridge, 96 Mich L Rev at 1532-42 (cited in note 25).
84. Molot, 106 Colum L Rev at 50-53.
85. Public Citizen v U.S. Department of Justice, 491 US 440, 452-54 (1989).
86. Zuni Public School District No. 89 v Department of Education, 550 US 81, 107 n 3 (2007).
87. United States v Dodd, 545 US 353, 369 (2005).
88. Chapman v United States, 500 US 453, 476 (1991).
89. John F. Manning, The Absurdity Doctrine, 116 Harv L Rev 2387, 2391-92 (2003).
90. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v Dimension Financial Corp., 474 US 361, 374 (1986).
91. Tennessee Valley Authority v Hill, 437 US 153, 194 (1978).
92. Rodriguez v United States, 480 US 522, 525-26 (1987).
93. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v Casey, 499 US 83, 98-99 (1991).
94. Brogan v United States, 522 US 398, 403 (1998).
95. Oncale v Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 US 75, 79 (1998).
96. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v AT&T Co., 512 US 218, 231 n 4 (1994).
97. Cooper Industries, Inc. v Aviall Services, Inc., 543 US 157, 167 (2004).
98. Barnhart v Sigmon Coal Co., Inc., 534 US 438, 461 (2002).
99. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v Yeskey, 524 US 206, 212 (1998).
100. City of Chicago v Environmental Defense Fund, 511 US 328, 339 (1994).
101. 503 US 249 (1992).
102. Rubin v United States, 449 US 424, 430 (1981).
103. Morrison v National Australia Bank Ltd., 130 S Ct 2869, 2886 (2010).
104. Hardt v Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., 130 S Ct 2149, 2156 (2010).
105. Gross v FBL Financial Services, Inc., 129 S Ct 2343, 2350 (2009).
106. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co. v Union Planters Bank, N.A., 530 US 1, 6 (2000).
107. Hughes Aircraft Co. v Jacobson, 525 US 432, 438 (1999).
108. Estate of Cowart v Nicklos Drilling Co., 505 US 469, 475 (1992).
109. Philip P. Frickey, Revisiting the Revival of Theory in Statutory Interpretation: A Lecture in Honor of Irving Younger, 84 Minn L Rev 199, 205 (1999).
110. Molot, 106 Colum L Rev at 32-34.
111. Schauer, 1990 Supreme Court Review at 231.
112. Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier and Samuel A. Thumma, Scaling the Lexicon Fortress: The United States Supreme Court's Use of Dictionaries in the Twenty-First Century, 94 Marq L Rev 77, 86 (2010).
113. Samuel A. Thumma and Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier, The Lexicon Remains a Fortress: An Update, 5 Greenbag 2d 51 (2001).
114. Samuel A. Thumma and Jeffrey L. Kirchmeier, The Lexicon Has Become a Fortress: The United States Supreme Court's Use of Dictionaries, 47 Buff L Rev 227, 252-60 (1999).
115. Merrill, 72 Wash U L Q at 372.
116. James J. Brudney and Corey Ditslear, The Decline and Fall of Legislative History? Patterns of Supreme Court Reliance in the Burger and Rehnquist Eras, 89 Judicature 220 (2006).
117. Michael H. Koby, The Supreme Court's Declining Reliance on Legislative History: The Impact of Justice Scalia's Critique, 36 Harv J Leg 369, 386-87 (1999).
118. Frank B. Cross, Essay, The Significance of Statutory Interpretive Methodologies, 82 Notre Dame L Rev 1971, 1979-88 (2007).
119. Jane S. Schacter, The Confounding Common Law Originalism in Recent Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation: Implications for the Legislative History Debate and Beyond, 51 Stan L Rev 1 (1998).
120. Anita S. Krishnakumar, Statutory Interpretation in the Roberts Court's First Era: An Empirical and Doctrinal Analysis, 62 Hastings L J 221 (2010).
121. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v Nigh, 543 US 50, 65 (2004).
122. Hamilton v Lanning, 130 S Ct 2464, 2485 (2010).
123. Small v United States, 544 US 385, 395 (2005).
124. AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion, 131 S Ct 1740, 1748-53 (2011).
125. FDA v Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 US 120, 143-61 (2000).
126. Molot, 106 Colum L Rev at 32-33.
127. Carr v United States, 130 S Ct 2229, 2241-42 (2010).
128. Arlington Central School District Board of Education v Murphy, 548 US 291, 296 (2006).
129. Bates v United States, 522 US 23, 29 (1997).
130. Boyle v United States, 129 S Ct 2237, 2246 (2009).
131. Elliott M. Davis, Note, The Newer Textualism: Justice Alito's Statutory Interpretation, 30 Harv J L & Pub Pol 983 (2007).
132. Zedner v United States, 547 US 489, 501 (2006).
133. Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v United States, 130 S Ct 1324, 1332 n 3 (2010).
134. Lockhart v United States, 546 US 142, 146 (2005).
135. Union Bank v Wolas, 502 US 151, 158 (1991).
136. Till v SCS Credit Corp., 541 US 465, 483 (2004).
137. United States v Gonzales, 520 US 1, 6 (1997).
138. Connecticut National Bank v Germain, 503 US 249, 254 (1992).
139. Frickey, 84 Minn L Rev at 205.
140. Bradley C. Karkkainen, "Plain Meaning": Justice Scalia's Jurisprudence of Strict Statutory Construction, 17 Harv J L & Pub Pol 401, 402 (1994).
141. Molot, 106 Colum L Rev at 32.
142. William N. Eskridge Jr. and Philip P. Frickey, The Supreme Court 1993.
143. Term-Forward: Law as Equilibrium, 108 Harv L Rev 26, 27 (1993).
144. CSX Transportation, Inc. v McBride, 131 S Ct 2630, 2642-43 (2011).
145. Fowler v United States, 131 S Ct 2045, 2049 (2011).
146. Abbott v United States, 131 S Ct 18, 31 n 9 (2010).
147. Caron v United States, 524 US 308, 316 (1998).
148. Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v United States, 130 S Ct 1324, 1339 (2010).
149. Harbison v Bell, 129 S Ct 1481, 1487 n 6 (2009).
150. Watson v Philip Morris Companies, Inc., 551 US 142, 147-52 (2007).
151. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v Nigh, 543 US 50, 62-64 (2004).
152. Asgrow Seed Co. v Winterboer, 513 US 179, 192 (1995).
153. Samantar v Yousuf, 130 S Ct 2278, 2294 (2010).
154. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v Mortier, 501 US 597, 611-12, n 4 (1991).
155. Samantar, 130 S Ct at 2289 n 12.
156. Corley v United States, 129 S Ct 1558, 1568-69 (2009).
157. Scheidler v National Organization for Women, Inc., 547 US 9, 20 (2006).
158. HR Rep No 304, 80th Cong, 1st Sess A131 (1947).
159. Scarborough v Principi, 541 US 401, 417 (2004).
160. 131 S Ct 1259 (2011).
161. 5 USC § 552(b)(2).
162. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1261.
163. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1263-64.
164. Milner v United States Department of the Navy, 575 F3d 959, 967-68 (9th Cir 2009).
165. Crooker, 670 F2d at 1074.
166. Crooker, 670 F2d at 1060.
167. HR Rep No 1497, 86th Cong, 2d Sess 10 (1966).
168. 5 USC § 552(a)(2)(C).
169. Crooker, 670 F2d at 1062-63.
170. 5 USC § 552(7)(E).
171. Crooker, 670 F2d at1063-65.
172. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1264.
173. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1275.
174. Crooker, 670 F2d at 1074.
175. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1275.
176. John Doe Agency v John Doe Corp., 493 US 146, 157 (1989).
177. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1276.
178. John Doe Agency, 493 US at 157.
179. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1276.
180. S Rep No 1219, 88th Cong, 2d Sess 8, 11 (1964).
181. S Rep No 813, 89th Cong, 1st Sess 3, 5 (1965).
182. HR Rep No 1497, 86th Cong, 2d Sess 2, 6 (1966).
183. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1267.
184. Elliott v United States Department of Agriculture, 596 F3d 842, 845 (DC Cir 2010).
185. Milner, 131 S Ct at 1267.
186. 131 S Ct 2205 (2011).
187. 42 USC § 1988(b).
188. Newman v Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 US 400, 402 (1968).
189. Christiansburg Garment Co. v EEOC, 434 US 412, 421 (1978).
190. Fox v Vice, 131 S Ct 2205, 2211 (2011).
191. Fox v Vice, 594 F3d 423, 425 (5th Cir 2010).
192. Vice, 131 S Ct at 2215.
193. Newman v Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 US 400, 402 (1968).
194. Vice, 131 S Ct at 2213.
195. Discussing Riverside v Rivera, 477 US 561, 577-78 (1986).
196. Christiansburg Garment Co. v EEOC, 434 US 412, 416, 418 (1978).
197. Newman, 390 US at 402.
198. Vice, 131 S Ct at 2214.
199. Christiansburg Garment Co., 434 US at 419, 420.
200. Vice, 131 S Ct at 2213.
201. 42 USC § 1988(b).
202. Radin, 43 Harv L Rev at 883-84.
203. Easterbrook, 50 U Chi L Rev at 544.
204. 550 US 81 (2007).
205. 20 USC § 7701 et seq.
206. Zuni, 550 US at 84-85.
207. 20 USC § 7709(b)(1) (2006).
208. Zuni, 550 US at 88-89.
209. Chevron USA, Inc. v Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 US 837 (1984).
210. Zuni, 550 US at 89-90.
211. CSX Transportation, Inc. v Alabama Department of Revenue, 131 S Ct 1101, 1107 (2011).
212. Landreth Timber Co. v Landreth, 471 US 681, 685 (1985).
213. Blue Chip Stamps v Manor Drug Stores, 421 US 723, 756 (1975).
214. Zuni, 550 US at 90.
215. Zuni, 550 US at 92-93.
216. 20 USC § 7709(b)(2)(B)(i).
217. Zuni, 550 US at 116.
218. Stephen Breyer, Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution 85-101 (Knopf, 2005).
219. Zuni, 550 US at 95.
220. John Black, A Dictionary of Economics 348-49 (2d ed 2002).
221. Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson, The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics 378-79 (3d ed 2005).
222. The American Heritage Science Dictionary 468 (2005).
223. Merriam-Webster's Medical Desk Dictionary 612 (2002).
224. Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1675 (1961).
225. Zuni, 550 US at 96.
226. Breyer, Active Liberty 85-101.
227. Exxon Mobil Corp. v Allapattah Services, Inc., 545 US 546, 573-77 (2005).
228. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v Nigh, 543 US 50, 65-66 (2004).
229. Wisconsin Public Intervenor v Mortier, 501 US 597, 620 (1991).
230. Blanchard v Bergeron, 489 US 87, 99 (1989).
231. Samantar v Yousuf, 130 S Ct 2278, 2293 (2010).
232. Wyeth v Levine, 555 US 555, 594 (2009).
233. United States v Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 US 235, 242 (1989).
234. Griffin v Oceanic Contractors, Inc., 458 US 564, 571 (1982).
235. Radin, 43 Harv L Rev at 876.
236. T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Updating Statutory Interpretation, 87 Mich L Rev 20, 26-27 (1988).
237. William N. Eskridge Jr. and Philip P. Frickey, Legislation Scholarship and Pedagogy in the Post-Legal Process Era, 48 U Pitt L Rev 691, 698-99 (1987).
238. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1374.
239. Archibald Cox, Judge Learned Hand and the Interpretation of Statutes, 60 Harv L Rev 370, 370 (1947).
240. Frankfurter, 47 Colum L Rev at 538-39.
241. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1374.
242. Max Radin, A Short Way with Statutes, 56 Harv L Rev 388 (1942).
243. William N. Eskridge Jr., and Philip P. Frickey, Statutory Interpretation as Practical Reasoning, 42 Stan L Rev 321, 332-33 (1990).
244. Radin, 56 Harv L Rev at 398
245. 115 NY 506 (1889).
246. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 90.
247. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1194.
248. Fuller, 62 Harv L Rev at 625-26.
249. Radin, 43 Harv L Rev at 876-78.
250. 47 USC § 307(a).
251. 21 USC § 841(b)(1)(B)(vi).
252. Chapman v United States, 500 US 453, 457-64 (1991).
253. Jerome Frank, Words and Music: Some Remarks on Statutory Interpretation, 47 Colum L Rev 1259, 1267 (1947).
254. Frankfurter, 47 Colum L Rev at 534.
255. Easterbrook, 50 U Chi L Rev at 546-47.
256. Louis Kaplow, Rules Versus Standards: An Economic Analysis, 42 Duke L J 557, 591 (1992).
257. Colin S. Diver, The Optimal Precision of Administrative Rules, 93 Yale L J 65, 73 (1983).
258. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 4.
259. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 89.
260. Manning, 116 Harv L Rev at 2465-76.
261. Young v United States, 535 US 43, 49-50 (2002).
262. Staples v United States, 511 US 600, 605 (1994).
263. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1192.
264. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1142-43.
265. Johnson v Southern Pacific Co., 117 F 462 (8th Cir 1902).
266. 196 US 1 (1904).
267. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1194.
268. The T.J. Hooper, 60 F2d 737 (2d Cir 1932).
269. Texas Industries, Inc. v Radcliff Materials, Inc., 451 US 630, 641 (1981).
270. Manning, 101 Colum L Rev at 36-78.
271. US Const, Art I, § 8, cl 18.
272. 17 US (4 Wheat) 316 (1819).
273. Thomas M. Cooley, A Treatise on the Constitutional Limitations Which Rest Upon the Legislative Power of the United States of the American Union 77 (1883).
274. McCulloch, 17 US at 420-21.
275. Gary Lawson, Geoffrey P. Miller, Robert G. Natelson, and Guy I. Seidman, The Origins of the Necessary and Proper Clause (Cambridge, 2010).
276. J. Randy Beck, The New Jurisprudence of the Necessary and Proper Clause, 2002 U Ill L Rev 581.
277. Gary Lawson and Patricia B. Granger, The "Proper" Scope of Federal Power: A Jurisdictional Interpretation of the Sweeping Clause, 43 Duke L J 267 (1993).
278. Robert G. Natelson, The Agency Law Origins of the Necessary and Proper Clause, 55 Case W Res L Rev 243 (2004).
279. William W. Van Alstyne, The Role of Congress in Determining Incidental Powers of the President and of the Federal Courts: A Comment on the Horizontal Effect of the Sweeping Clause, 40 L & Contemp Probs 102 (1976).
280. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority v Citizens for the Abatement of Aircraft Noise, Inc., 501 US 252, 276-77 (1991).
281. Bowsher v Synar, 478 US 714, 721-27 (1986).
282. INS v Chadha, 462 US 919, 951-56 (1983).
283. John F. Manning, Separation of Powers as Ordinary Interpretation, 124 Harv L Rev 1939, 1962-64 (2011).
284. Peter L. Strauss, Formal and Functional Approaches to Separation-of-Powers Questions-A Foolish Inconsistency? 72 Cornell L Rev 488, 496-502 (1988).
285. Joel D. Aberbach, Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight (Brookings, 1991).
286. J. R. DeShazo and Jody Freeman, The Congressional Competition to Control Delegated Power, 81 Tex L Rev 1443 (2003).
287. Peter L. Strauss, Overseer, or "The Decider"? The President in Administrative Law, 75 Geo Wash L Rev 696, 746 (2007).
288. Van Alstyne, 40 L & Contemp Probs at 118-19.
289. Gary Lawson, Discretion as Delegation: The "Proper" Understanding of the Nondelegation Doctrine, 73 Geo Wash L Rev 235, 237 (2005).
290. Kenneth Culp Davis, A New Approach to Delegation, 36 U Chi L Rev 713, 719-20 (1969).
291. Harold J. Krent, Delegation and Its Discontents, 94 Colum L Rev 710, 738-39 (1994).
292. Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule, Interring the Nondelegation Doctrine, 69 U Chi L Rev 1721, 1735-41 (2002).
293. Gary Lawson, Delegation and Original Meaning, 88 Va L Rev 327, 396-402 (2002).
294. Michael B. Rappaport, The Selective Nondelegation Doctrine and the Line Item Veto: A New Approach to the Nondelegation Doctrine and Its Implications for Clinton v. City of New York, 76 Tulane L Rev 265, 310 & n 154, 346-53 (2001
295. Textile Workers Union of America v Lincoln Mills of Alabama, 353 US 448, 455-56, 459 (1957).
296. Lichter v United States, 334 US 742, 785-86 (1948).
297. American Power & Light Co. v SEC, 329 US 90, 104 (1946).
298. Loving v United States, 517 US 748, 758 (1996).
299. Touby v United States, 500 US 160, 164-65 (1991).
300. ICC v Goodrich Transit Co., 224 US 194, 214 (1912).
301. Union Bridge Co. v United States, 204 US 364, 386 (1907).
302. ALA Schechter Poultry Corp. v United States, 295 US 495 (1935).
303. Panama Refining Co. v Ryan, 293 US 388 (1935).
304. Yakus v United States, 321 US 414, 420, 423-26 (1944).
305. Federal Power Commission v Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 US 591, 600 (1944).
306. National Broadcasting Co. v United States, 319 US 190, 225-26 (1943).
307. Yakus, 321 US at 425-26.
308. Currin v Wallace, 306 US 1, 15 (1939).
309. Panama Refining, 293 US at 421.
310. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v United States, 276 US 394, 406 (1928).
311. Union Bridge Co. v United States, 204 US 364, 386 (1907).
312. 531 US 457 (2001).
313. 42 USC § 7409(b)(1).
314. Whitman, 531 US at 473-76.
315. Mistretta v United States, 488 US 361, 417 (1989).
316. Whitman, 531 US at 474-75.
317. Mistretta, 488 US at 416.
318. Whitman, 531 US at 474-75.
319. 467 US 837 (1984).
320. John F. Manning, Constitutional Structure and Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Agency Rules, 96 Colum L Rev 612, 624 (1996).
321. United States v Mead Corp., 533 US 218, 229-31 (2001).
322. Chevron, 467 US at 842-43.
323. Landgraf v USI Film Products, 511 US 244, 286 (1994).
324. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v LTV Corp., 496 US 633, 646-47 (1990).
325. Rodriguez v United States, 480 US 522, 525-26 (1987).
326. Jerman v Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, 130 S Ct 1605, 1617 n 12 (2010).
327. United States v Ressem, 553 US 272, 275 (2008).
328. Begay v United States, 553 US 137, 143 (2008).
329. James J. Brudney, Confirmatory Legislative History, 76 Brooklyn L Rev 901 (2011).
330. Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v Wilson, 130 S Ct 1396, 1407, 1409 (2010).
331. Richlin Security Service Co. v Chertoff, 553 US 571, 584 n 8 (2008).
332. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd. v Coke, 551 US 158, 168 (2007).
333. Small v United States, 544 US 385, 393 (2005).
334. Eskridge, 37 UCLA L Rev at 625.
335. Tapia v United States, 131 S Ct 2382, 2391 (2011).
336. Microsoft Corp. v i4i Ltd. Partnership, 131 S Ct 2238, 2249 n 8 (2011).
337. Abbott v United States, 131 S Ct 18, 29 n 7 (2010).
338. Marbury v Madison, 5 US (1 Cranch) 137, 178 (1803).
339. John F. Manning, Textualism as a Nondelegation Doctrine, 97 Colum L Rev 673, 728 (1997).
340. Holy Trinity Church v United States, 143 US 457, 464-65 (1892).
341. Adrian Vermeule, Legislative History and the Limits of Judicial Competence: The Untold Story of Holy Trinity Church, 50 Stan L Rev 1833, 1845-50 (1998).
342. Holy Trinity, 143 US at 458-59.
343. Eskridge, 96 Mich L Rev at 1517-18.
344. Manning, 116 Harv L Rev at 2424-27.
345. Randy E. Barnett, Interpretation and Construction, 34 Harv J L & Pub Pol 65, 67 (2011).
346. Lawrence B. Solum, The Interpretation-Construction Distinction, 27 Const Comm 95, 97-98 (2010).
347. E. Allan Farnsworth, "Meaning" in the Law of Contracts, 76 Yale L J 939, 953 (1967).
348. Barnett, 34 Harv J L & Pub Pol at 67.
349. Solum, 27 Const Comm at 97-98.
350. Farnsworth, 76 Yale L J at 953.
351. Lawrence Lessig, Understanding Changed Readings: Fidelity and Theory, 47 Stan L Rev 395, 407-08 (1995).
352. General Dynamics Land System, Inc. v Cline, 540 US 581 (2004).
353. 29 USC §§ 621-34.
354. 29 USC § 623(a)(1).
355. Cline, 540 US at 596.
356. Barnett, 34 Harv J L & Pub Pol at 67.
357. Solum, 27 Const Comm at 98.
358. Farnsworth, 76 Yale L J at 953.
359. Edward L. Rubin, Law and Legislation in the Administrative State, 89 Colum L Rev 369, 380-85 (1989).
360. Richard J. Pierce Jr., The Role of the Judiciary in Implementing an Agency Theory of Government, 64 NYU L Rev 1239, 1244-46 (1989).
361. 47 USC §§ 307(c)(1), 309(a), 310(d).
362. 16 USC § 824d(a).
363. 15 USC § 2.
364. 42 USC § 1988(b).
365. Continental Can Co., Inc. v Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers & Warehouse Workers Union, 916 F2d 1154 (7th Cir 1990).
366. 131 S Ct 2205 (2011).
367. Blanchard v Bergeron, 489 US 87 (1989).
368. 42 USC § 1988.
369. Johnson v Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F2d 714 (5th Cir 1974).
370. 42 USC § 2000e-5(k).
371. Blanchard, 489 US at 91.
372. John F. Manning and Matthew C. Stephenson, Legislation and Regulation 886-87 (Foundation, 2010).
373. Chevron, 467 US at 843 n 9.
374. Chapman v United States, 500 US 453, 476 (1991).
375. Cabell v Markham, 148 F2d 737, 739 (2d Cir), aff 'd.
376. 326 US 404 (1945).
377. SEC v C.M. Joiner Leasing Corp., 320 US 344, 350 (1943).
378. Watt v Western Nuclear, Inc., 462 US 36, 44 n 5 (1983).
379. Tapia v United States, 131 S Ct 2382, 2388 (2011).
380. DePierre v United States, 131 S Ct 2225, 2228 (2011).
381. Webster's Third New International Dictionary 434 (2002).
382. Milner v Department of the Navy, 131 S Ct 1259, 1264 (2011).
383. Ransom v FIA Card Services, N.A., 131 S Ct 716, 724 (2011).
384. Fowler v United States, 131 S Ct 2045, 2051 (2011).
385. Muscarello v United States, 524 US 125, 127-32 (1998).
386. Dunn v Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 519 US 465, 470 (1997).
387. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v AT&T Co., 512 US 218, 240-42 (1994).
388. Microsoft Corp. v i4i Ltd. Partnership, 131 S Ct 2238, 2245 (2011).
389. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v Burr, 551 US 47, 58 (2007).
390. Willkie v Robbins, 551 US 537, 563-64 (2007).
391. Field v Mans, 516 US 59, 69 (1995).
392. Evans v United States, 504 US 255, 259 (1992).
393. Morissette v United States, 342 US 246, 263 (1952).
394. Manning, 116 Harv L Rev at 2464.
395. CSX Transportation, Inc. v Alabama Department of Revenue, 131 S Ct 1101, 1113 (2011).
396. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v Wilson, 130 S Ct 1396, 1412-14 (2010).
397. Washington State Department of Social and Health Services v Guardianship of Keffeler, 537 US 371, 384 (2003).
398. Chevron USA Inc. v Echazabal, 536 US 73, 81 (2002).
399. TRW Inc. v Andrews, 534 US 19, 28 (2001).
400. Conroy v Aniskoff, 507 US 511, 516 (1993).
401. Third National Bank in Nashville v Impac Ltd., Inc., 432 US 312, 322 & n 16 (1977).
402. United States v Feola, 420 US 671, 708 (1975).
403. Gerald C. MacCallum Jr., Legislative Intent, 75 Yale L J 754, 758 (1966).
404. Jeremy Waldron, Legislators' Intention and Unintentional Legislation, in Andrei Marmor, ed, Law and Interpretation: Essays in Legal Philosophy 329, 339 (Clarendon, 1995).
405. Ellen P. Aprill, The Law of the Word: Dictionary Shopping in the Supreme Court, 30 Ariz St L J 275, 283-92 (1998).
406. Lawrence A. Solan, When Judges Use the Dictionary, 68 Am Speech 50, 55 (1993).
407. Looking It Up: Dictionaries and Statutory Interpretation, 107 Harv L Rev 1437, 1452 (1994).
408. Hart and Sacks, The Legal Process at 1190.
409. Clark D. Cunningham et al, Plain Meaning and Hard Cases, 103 Yale L J 1561, 1615 (1994).
410. Solan, 68 Am Speech at 53.
411. Smith v United States, 508 US 223 (1993).
412. 18 USC § 924(c)(1)(A).
413. Smith, 508 US at 225.
414. Webster's New International Dictionary 2806 (2d ed 1939).
415. Smith, 508 US at 241-42.
416. Sunstein, 103 Harv L Rev at 418-19.
417. frank H. Easterbrook, Text, History, and Structure in Statutory Interpretation, 17 Harv J L & Pub Pol 61, 67 (1994).
418. Moskal v United States, 498 US 103, 122-25 (1990).
419. Karl N. Llewellyn, Remarks on the Theory of Appellate Decision and the Rules or Canons About How Statutes Are to Be Construed, 3 Vand L Rev 395 (1950).
420. Easterbrook, 50 U Chi L Rev at 540.
421. Eskridge and Frickey, 108 Harv L Rev at 66.
422. Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation at 26.
423. David L. Shapiro, Continuity and Change in Statutory Interpretation, 67 NYU L Rev 921, 923 (1992).
424. Sunstein, 103 Harv L Rev at 452-54.
425. Jonathan R. Macey and Geoffrey P. Miller, The Canons of Statutory Construction and Judicial Preferences, 45 Vand L Rev 647, 650-51 (1992).
426. Boston Sand & Gravel Co. v United States, 278 US 41, 48 (1928).
427. Shapiro, 67 NYU L Rev at 927.
428. Sunstein, 103 Harv L Rev at 455.
429. Harold Hongju Koh, The President versus the Senate in Treaty Interpretation: What's All the Fuss About? 15 Yale J Intl L 331, 335 (1990).
430. Longview Fibre Co. v Rasmussen, 980 F2d 1307, 1313 (9th Cir 1992).
431. Chevron USA Inc. v Echazabal, 536 US 73, 81 (2002).
432. Geoffrey P. Miller, Pragmatics and the Maxims of Interpretation, 1990 Wisc L Rev 1179, 1196.
433. Silvers v Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc., 402 F3d 881, 885 (9th Cir 2005).
434. Scalia, A Matter of Interpretation at 26.
435. John F. Manning, What Divides Textualists from Purposivists? 106 Colum L Rev 70, 91 (2006).
436. 143 US 457 (1892).