Constitutional structure and judicial deference to agency interpretations of agency rules

Columbia Law Review

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 612-613

  Manning, John F ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042540004     PISSN: 00101958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1123259     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. 1 William Blackstone, Commentaries *58.
2. 467 U.S. 837 (1984).
3. Id. at 843, 844.
4. See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16 (1965); Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410, 414 (1945).
5. 325 U.S. 410 (1945).
6. Id. at 414; see also United States v. Larionoff, 431 U.S. 864, 872-73 (1977) (agency interpretation controlling unless "plainly inconsistent with the wording of the regulations").
7. Ehlert v. United States, 402 U.S. 99, 105 (1971).
8. Pauley v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc., 501 U.S. 680, 702 (1991).
9. For articles defending Chevron deference, see, e.g., Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 Vand. L. Rev. 301, 303 (1988); Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law, 1989 Duke L.J. 511, 516-17; Laurence H. Silberman, Chevron - The Intersection of Law & Policy, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 821, 823 (1990); Kenneth W. Starr, Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era, 3 Yale J. on Reg. 283, 307-09 (1986); Peter L. Strauss, One Hundred Fifty Cases Per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court's Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Colum. L. Rev. 1093, 1121-22 (1987). For viewpoints critical of Chevron, see, e.g., Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of
10. For articles defending Chevron deference, see, e.g., Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 Vand. L. Rev. 301, 303 (1988); Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law, 1989 Duke L.J. 511, 516-17; Laurence H. Silberman, Chevron - The Intersection of Law & Policy, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 821, 823 (1990); Kenneth W. Starr, Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era, 3 Yale J. on Reg. 283, 307-09 (1986); Peter L. Strauss, One Hundred Fifty Cases Per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court's Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Colum. L. Rev. 1093, 1121-22 (1987). For viewpoints critical of Chevron, see, e.g., Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of
11. For articles defending Chevron deference, see, e.g., Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 Vand. L. Rev. 301, 303 (1988); Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law, 1989 Duke L.J. 511, 516-17; Laurence H. Silberman, Chevron - The Intersection of Law & Policy, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 821, 823 (1990); Kenneth W. Starr, Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era, 3 Yale J. on Reg. 283, 307-09 (1986); Peter L. Strauss, One Hundred Fifty Cases Per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court's Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Colum. L. Rev. 1093, 1121-22 (1987). For viewpoints critical of Chevron, see, e.g., Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of
12. For articles defending Chevron deference, see, e.g., Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 Vand. L. Rev. 301, 303 (1988); Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law, 1989 Duke L.J. 511, 516-17; Laurence H. Silberman, Chevron - The Intersection of Law & Policy, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 821, 823 (1990); Kenneth W. Starr, Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era, 3 Yale J. on Reg. 283, 307-09 (1986); Peter L. Strauss, One Hundred Fifty Cases Per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court's Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Colum. L. Rev. 1093, 1121-22 (1987). For viewpoints critical of Chevron, see, e.g., Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of
13. For articles defending Chevron deference, see, e.g., Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 Vand. L. Rev. 301, 303 (1988); Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law, 1989 Duke L.J. 511, 516-17; Laurence H. Silberman, Chevron - The Intersection of Law & Policy, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 821, 823 (1990); Kenneth W. Starr, Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era, 3 Yale J. on Reg. 283, 307-09 (1986); Peter L. Strauss, One Hundred Fifty Cases Per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court's Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Colum. L. Rev. 1093, 1121-22 (1987). For viewpoints critical of Chevron, see, e.g., Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of
14. For articles defending Chevron deference, see, e.g., Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Chevron and its Aftermath: Judicial Review of Agency Interpretations of Statutory Provisions, 41 Vand. L. Rev. 301, 303 (1988); Antonin Scalia, Judicial Deference to Agency Interpretations of Law, 1989 Duke L.J. 511, 516-17; Laurence H. Silberman, Chevron - The Intersection of Law & Policy, 58 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 821, 823 (1990); Kenneth W. Starr, Judicial Review in the Post-Chevron Era, 3 Yale J. on Reg. 283, 307-09 (1986); Peter L. Strauss, One Hundred Fifty Cases Per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court's Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Colum. L. Rev. 1093, 1121-22 (1987). For viewpoints critical of Chevron, see, e.g., Stephen Breyer, Judicial Review of