The promotion of critical thinking skills through argument mapping

Critical Thinking

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 97-121

  Dwyer, Christopher ^a   Hogan, Michael ^a   Stewart, Ian ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861344240     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (57)

1. Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Surkes, M.A., Tamim, R. & Zhang, D., (2008). Instructional interventions affecting critical thinking skills and dispositions: A stage 1 meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 4, 1102-1134.
2. Adams, M.H., Whitlow, J.F., Stover, L.M. and Johnson, K.W., (1996). Critical thinking as an educational outcome: an evaluation of current tools of measurement. Nurse Educator, 21, 23-32.
3. Allegretti, C.L. and Frederick, J.N. (1995). A model for thinking critically about ethical issues. Teaching of Psychology, Vol. 22, 1, 46-48.
4. Allen, R., Feezel, J., & Kauffeld, F. (1967). A taxonomy of concepts and critical abilities related to the evaluation of verbal arguments (Occasional Paper No. 9). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development, Center for Cognitive Learning.
5. Alvarez-Ortiz, C. (2007). Does Philosophy Improve Critical Thinking Skills? Unpublished thesis.
6. Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
7. Association of American Colleges & Universities, (2005). Liberal education outcomes: A preliminary report on student achievement in college. Washington, DC.
8. Australian Council for Educational Research, (2002). Graduate skills assessment. Commonwealth of Australia.
9. Beckie, Theresa, M., Lowry, Lois, W. & Barnett, Scott (2001). Assessing critical thinking in Baccalaureate nursing students: A longitudinal study. Holistic Nursing Practice, 15(3), 18-26.
10. Bensley, D.A. (1998). Critical thinking in psychology: A unified skills approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks & Cole.
11. Bloom, B.S., (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.
12. Butchart, S., Bigelow, J., Oppy, G., Korb, K., & Gold, I. (2009). Improving critical thinking using web-based argument mapping exercises with automated feedback. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25, 2, 268-291.
13. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington, MA: Heath.
14. Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M.J. & I. Stewart, (2010). The evaluation of argument mapping as a learning tool: Comparing the effects of map reading versus text reading on comprehension and recall of arguments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5, 1, 16-22.
15. El Hassan, K. and Madhum, G., (2007). Validating the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. Higher Education, 54, 361-383.
16. Ennis, R.H., (1987). A taxonomoy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice, eds. J.B. Baron, and R.J. Sternberg. New York: W.H. Freeman, 9-26.
17. Ennis, R.H., (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18, 3, 4-10.
18. Ennis, R.H., Millman, J. & T.N. Tomko (1985). Cornell Critical Thinking Tests CA: Critical Thinking Co.
19. Ennis, R.H. & Weir, E., (1985). The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.
20. Facione, N.E. (1990). The Delphi report. Committee on pre-college philosophy. American Philosophical Association.
21. Facione, P.A., (1991). The California Critical Thinking Skills Test: College Level Technical Report #1 - Experimental Validation and Content Validity. Unpublished.
22. Facione, P.C. & Facione, N.A. (1992). California Critical Thinking Skills Test. California Academic Press, California.
23. Facione, P.A., Facione, N. C., Blohm, S. W., & Giancarlo, C. A. (2002). The California Critical Thinking Skills Test: CCTST. Form A, Form B, and Form 2000. Test manual, 2002 updated edition. Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment.
24. Gabennesch, H. (2006). Critical thinking.what is it good for? (In fact, what is it?). Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. 30, 2, pp. 36-41.
25. Glaser, E. M. (1941). An experiment on the development of critical thinking. Teachers College Contributions to Education, No. 843. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
26. Halpern, D.F. (2003). Thought & Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking (4th Ed.). New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Halpern, D.F. (2004). A cognitive taxonomy for sex differences in cognitive abilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 135-139.
28. Harrell, M., (2004). The improvement of critical thinking skills. In What Philosophy Is (Tech. Rep. CMU-PHIL-158). Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Philosophy.
29. Harrell, M., (2005). Using argument diagramming software in the classroom. Teaching Philosophy, 28, 2
30. Higher Education Quality Council, Quality Enhancement Group, (1996). What are graduates? Clarifying the attributes of "graduateness". London: HEQC.
31. Holmes, J. and Clizbe, E., (1997). Facing the 21st century. Business Education Forum, 52, 1, 33-35.
32. Jacobs, S. S. (1995). Technical characteristics and some correlates of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test Forms A and B. Higher Education Research, 36, 89-108.
33. Kintsch, W. & van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.
34. Ku, K.Y.L., (2009). Assessing students' critical thinking performance: Urging for measurements using multi-response format. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 1, 70- 76.
35. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Kurfiss, J.G., (1988) Critical thinking: Theory, research, practice and possibilities. Association for the Study of Higher Education, Report No. 2, Washington D.C.
37. Marzano, R.J., (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-Continent Regional Educational Laboratory. http://www.mcrel.org/pdf/instruction/5982rr_instructionmeta_analysis.pdf, 26, October, 2007.
38. MacPherson, K., (1999). The development of critical thinking skills in undergraduate supervisory management unites: Efficacy of student peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 3, 273-284.
39. Monk, P. (2001). Mapping the future of argument. Australian Financial Review. 16, March, pp.8-9.
40. Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliot, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J. & Newton, D., (2005). Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energising and employing America for a brighter economic future. Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy for the 21st Century, Washington, DC.
42. Paul, R.W. (1993). Critical Thinking - what every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world (3rd ed.). Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
43. Quitadamo, I.J. and Kurtz, M.J., (2007). Learning to improve: Using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology. CBE -Life Sciences Education, 6, 140-154.
44. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
45. Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design in technical areas. Australian Education Review No. 43. Victoria: Acer Press.
46. Taube, K.T., (1997). Critical thinking ability and disposition as factors of performance on a written critical thinking test. Journal of General Education, 46, 129-164.
47. Thomson, A., (2009). Critical Reasoning: A practical introduction (3rd ed.). UK: Routledge.
48. Tindall-Ford, S; Chandler, P. & Sweller, J., (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 3, No. 4: 257 -287.
49. U.S. Department of Education, (1990). National goals for education. Washington, DC.
50. van Gelder, T.J. (2000). Learning to reason: A Reason-Able! approach. In C. Davis, T. J. van Gelder, & R. Wales (eds.), Cognitive Science in Australia, 2000:Proceedings of the Fifth Australasian Cognitive Science Society Conference. Adelaide: Causal.
51. van Gelder, T. J. (2001). How to improve critical thinking using educational technology. In G. Kennedy, M. Keppell, C. McNaught, & T. Petrovic (Eds.), Meeting at the Crossroads: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers In Learning In Tertiary Education, 539- 548. Melbourne: Biomedical Multimedia Unit, Ùniversity of Melbourne.
52. van Gelder, T.J., (2003). Enhancing deliberation through computer supported argument mapping. In Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S., Carr, C. (eds.), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, 97- 115, London: Springer-Verlag.
53. van Gelder, T.J., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Enhancing expertise in informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 58, 142-52.
54. van Gelder, T.J. & Rizzo, A. (2001). Reason!Able across curriculum, in Is IT an Odyssey in Learning? Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of ICT in Education, Victoria, Australia.
55. Watson, G. & E.M. Glaser (1980). Critical thinking appraisal. New York: Psychological Corporation.
56. Wilkinson J.M., (1996). Nursing process: A critical thinking approach (2nd ed.). Menlo Park: Addison Wesley Nursing.
57. Willingham, D.T., (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 2007, 3, 8-19.