Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 221-229

  Nassauer, Joan Iverson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Planning; Scenario; Sustainability; Synthesis; Transdisciplinary; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS; FLOW VISUALIZATION; PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS; INHERENT CHARACTERISTICS; SCENARIO; TO EFFECT; TRANSDISCIPLINARY;

ECODESIGN;

ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; SUSTAINABILITY; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN DESIGN; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84861342098     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ahern J. Spatial concepts, planning strategies, and future scenarios: A framework method for integrating landscape ecology and landscape planning. Landscape ecological analysis: Issues and applications 1999, 175-199. Springer-Verlag, New York. J. Klopatek, R. Gardner (Eds.).
2. Albert C., Zimmermann T., Kneilling J., von Haaren C. Social learning can benefit decision-making in landscape planning: Gartow case study on climate change adaptation, Elbe valley biosphere reserve. Landscape and Urban Planning 2012, 105:347-360.
3. Allen T.F.H., Hoekstra T.W. Problems of scaling in restoration ecology: A practical application. Restoration ecology: A synthetic approach to ecological research 1987, 289-299. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. W.R. Jordan, M.E. Gilpin, J.D. Aber (Eds.).
4. Allen T.F.H., Hoekstra T.W. Toward a unified ecology 1992, Columbia University Press, New York.
5. Barton J., Haslett T. Analysis, synthesis, systems thinking and the scientific method: Rediscovering the importance of open systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2007, 24:143-155.
6. Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1692-1702.
7. Bohnet I.C. Integrating social and ecological knowledge for planning sustainable land-and sea-scapes: Experiences from the Great Barrier Reef region, Australia. Landscape Ecology 2010, 25:1201-2121.
8. Bohnet I., Smith D.M. Planning future landscapes in the Wet Tropics of Australia: A social-ecological framework. Landscape and Urban Planning 2007, 80:137-152.
9. Brauman K.A., Daily G.C., Duarte T.K., Mooney H.A. The nature and value of ecosystem services: An overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2007, 32:67-98.
10. Carpenter S., Arbrust E.V., Arzberger P.W., Chapin F.S., Elser J.J., Hackett E.J., et al. Accelerate synthesis in ecology and environmental sciences. BioScience 2009, 59:699-701.
11. Carpenter S., Folke C. Ecology for transformation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2006, 21:309-315.
12. Cash D.W., Clark W.C., Alcock F., Dickson N.M., Eckley N., Guston D.H., et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2003, 100:8086-8091.
13. Cronon W. Nature's metropolis: Chicago and the Great West 1992, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
14. Dewar M., Epstein D. Planning for 'megaregions' in the United States. Journal of Planning Literature 2007, 22:108-124.
15. Doering O.C., Kling C.L., Nassauer J.I., Scavia D. Agricultural policy choices. From the Corn Belt to the Gulf: Societal and environmental implications of alternative agricultural futures 2007, 185-200. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC. J.I. Nassauer, M.V. Santelmann, D. Scavia (Eds.).
16. Dramstad W.E., Fjellstad W.J. Landscapes: Bridging the gaps between science, policy and people. Landscape and Urban Planning 2011, 100:330-332.
17. Ford C.M., Gioia D.A. Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making. Journal of Management 2000, 26:705-732.
18. Fry G. Multifunctional landscapes-Towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 57:159-168.
19. Gilson L.L., Shalley C.E. A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management 2004, 30:453-470.
20. Gobster P.H., Nassauer J.I., Daniel T.C., Fry G. The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology?. Landscape Ecology 2007, 22:959-972.
21. Hein L., Vankoppen K., Degroot R., Vanierland E. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 2006, 57:209-228.
22. Hill K. Urban design and urban water ecosystems. The water environment of cities 2009, 141-170. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York. L.A. Baker (Ed.).
23. Hulse D.W., Branscomb A., Payne S.G. Envisioning alternatives: Using citizen guidance to map future land and water use. Ecological Applications 2004, 14:325-341.
24. Innes J.E., Booher D.E., Di Vittorio S. Strategies for megaregion governance. Journal of the American Planning Association 2010, 77:55-67.
25. Jackson J.B. Discovering the vernacular landscape 1984, Yale University Press, New Haven.
26. Lewis J.L., Sheppard S.R.J. Culture and communication: Can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities?. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77:291-313.
27. Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317(5844):1513-1516.
28. Lyle J. Design for human ecosystems 1985, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
29. Mahmoud M., Liu Y., Hartmann H., Stewart S., Wagener T., Semmens D., et al. A formal framework for scenario development in support of environmental decision-making. Environmental Modelling & Software 2009, 24:798-808.
30. McAlpine C., Seabrook L., Rhodes J., Maron M., Smith C., Bowen M., et al. Can a problem-solving approach strengthen landscape ecology's contribution to sustainable landscape planning?. Landscape Ecology 2010, 25:1155-1168.
31. Meinig D.W. The beholding eye: Ten versions of the same scene. The interpretation of ordinary landscapes: Geographical essays 1979, 33-48. Oxford University Press, New York. D.W. Meinig (Ed.).
32. Meinke H., Nelson R., Kokic P., Stone R., Selvaraju R., Baethgen W. Actionable climate knowledge: From analysis to synthesis. Climate Research 2006, 33:101-110.
33. Nassauer J.I. The appearance of ecological systems as a matter of policy. Landscape Ecology 1992, 6:239-250.
34. Nassauer J.I. Cultural sustainability: Aligning aesthetics and ecology. Placing nature: Culture in landscape ecology 1997, 65-83. Island Press, Washington, DC. J.I. Nassauer (Ed.).
35. Nassauer J.I. Culture as a means of experimentation and action. Issues in landscape ecology 1999, 129-133. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Guelph, Ontario. J.A. Weins, M.R. Moss (Eds.).
36. Nassauer J.I., Corry R.C. Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 2004, 19:343-356.
37. Nassauer J.I., Opdam P. Design in science: Extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecology 2008, 23:633-644.
38. From the Corn Belt to the Gulf: Societal and environmental implications of alternative agricultural futures. 2007, Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC. J.I. Nassauer, M.V. Santelmann, D. Scavia (Eds.).
39. Nassauer J.I., Wang Z., Dayrell E. What will the neighbors think? Cultural norms and ecological design. Landscape and Urban Planning 2009, 92:282-292.
40. Palmer M., Bernhardt E., Chornesky E., Collins S., Dobson A., Duke C., et al. Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 2004, 304:1251-1252.
41. Palmer M.A., Bernhardt E.S., Allan J.D., Lake P.S., Alexander G., Brooks S., et al. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 2005, 42.
42. Peters D.P.C. Accessible ecology: Synthesis of the long, deep, and broad. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2010, 25:592-601.
43. Pickett S.T.A., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M. Resilient cities: Meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69:369-384.
44. Pickett S.T.A., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., Nilon C.H., Pouyat R.V., Zipperer W.C., et al. Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 2001, 32.
45. PlaNYC Sustainable stormwater management plan 2008, City of New York, Office of the Mayor, New York.
46. Potschin M.B., Klug H., Haines-Young R.H. From vision to action: Framing the Leitbild concept in the context of landscape planning. Futures 2010, 42:656-667.
47. Rodiek J.E. Changing landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 1992, 23:v-vi.
48. Rodiek J.E. Landscape and Urban Planning: The Journal's role in communicating progress in the evolution of future urban environments. Landscape and Urban Planning 1995, 32:3-5.
49. Santelmann M., Freemark K., White D., Nassauer J., Clark M., Danielson B., et al. Applying ecological principles to land-use decision-making in agricultural watersheds. Applying ecological principles to land management 2001, 226-252. Springer-Verlag, New York. V.H. Dale, R.A. Haeuber (Eds.).
50. Scavia D., Nassauer J.I. Introduction: Policy insights from integrated assessments and alternative futures. From the Corn Belt to the Gulf: Societal and environmental implications of alternative agricultural futures 2007, 1-8. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC. J.I. Nassauer, M.V. Santelmann, D. Scavia (Eds.).
51. Schoonenboom I.J. Overview and state of the art of scenario studies for the rural environment. Environment and Policy 1995, 5:15-24.
52. Shearer A.W., Mouat D.A., Bassett S.D., Binford M.W., Johnson C.W., Saarinen J.A. Examining development-related uncertainties for environmental management: Strategic planning scenarios in Southern California. Landscape and Urban Planning 2006, 77:359-381.
53. Sheppard S.R.J. Participatory decision support for sustainable forest management: A framework for planning with local communities at the landscape level in Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2005, 35:1515-1526.
54. Spirn A.W. Landscape planning and the city. Landscape and Urban Planning 1986, 13:433-441.
55. Spirn A. The language of landscape 1998, Yale University Press, New Haven.
56. Star S.L. This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology & Human Values 2010, 35:601-617.
57. Steinitz C., Arias H., Bassett S., Flaxman M., Goode T., Maddock T., et al. Alternative futures for changing landscapes: The Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora 2003, Island Press, Washington, DC.
58. Swanwick C. Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:S62-S75.
59. Termorshuizen J., Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecology 2009, 24:1037-1052.
60. Treib M. Must landscapes mean? Approaches to significance in recent landscape architecture. Landscape Journal 1995, 14:46-62.
61. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2010). Partnership for sustainable communities: A year of progress for American communities. Report No. EPA 231-K-10-002, Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Sustainable Communities.
62. Walker B., Holling C.S., Carpenter S.R., Kinzig A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 2004, 9(2). art. No. 5.
63. Walsh C.J., Roy A.H., Cottingham J.W., Feminella P.D., Groffman P.M., Morgan R.P. The urban stream syndrome: Current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2005, 24:706-723.
64. Weddle A. Landscape Planning-Aims and scope of a new journal. Landscape Planning 1974, 1:1-5.
65. White D.D., Wutich A., Larson K.L., Gober P., Lant T., Senneville C. Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: Water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater. Science and Public Policy 2010, 37:219-232.
66. Zhou W., Troy A., Grove M. Modeling residential lawn fertilization practices: Integrating high resolution remote sensing with socioeconomic data. Environmental Management 2008, 41:742-752.