From vision to action: Framing the Leitbild concept in the context of landscape planning

Futures

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 656-667

  Potschin, Marion B ^a   Klug, Hermann ^b   Haines Young, Roy H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FUTURE PROSPECT; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; SPATIAL PLANNING; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABILITY;

SIA;

EID: 77955279572     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ache P. Vision and creativity-challenge for city regions. Futures 2000, 32:435-449.
2. Bastian O., Steinhardt U. Developments and Perspectives in Landscape Ecology 2002, Springer, Dordrecht/Boston/London.
3. J. Weiss, Evaluationsbericht zum Gesamtprojekt Kulturlandschaft Fischenthal (GFK). Das Vorprojekt 1994-1996, Meliorations- und Vermessungsamt des Kontons Zürich, Zürich, 1996.
4. Bosshard A. A methodology and terminology of sustainability assessment and its perspective for rural planning, Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 2000, 77:29-41.
5. L. Klages, Das persönliche Leitbild, Graphologische Monatshefte, 1906.
6. Adler A. Organdialekt 1912, Heilen und Bilden. A. Adler, C. Furtmüller (Eds.).
7. J. Kaiser, Planung, Baden-Baden, 1965.
8. W. Moeves, Grundlagen der Lebensraumgestaltung, Berlin, New York, 1980.
9. H. Leser, Dierke Wörterbuch der Allgemeinen Geographie, Braunschweig, München, 1984.
10. G. Wiegleb, F. Schulz. U. Bröring (Eds.), Naturschutzfachliche Bewertung im Rahmen der Leitbildmethode, 1999.
11. P. Finck, U. Hauke, E. Schröder, R. Forst. G. Woithe (Eds.), Naturschutzfachliche Landschafts-Leitbilder, Rahmenvorstellungen für das Nordwestdeutsche Tiefland aus bundesweiter Sicht, 1997.
12. Bastian O. Landschaftsfunktionen als Grundlage von Leitbildern für Naturräume. Natur und Landschaft 1999, 74(9):361-373.
13. T. Mosimann, I. Köhler, I. Poppe, Entwicklung prozessual begründeter landschaftsökologischer Leitbilder für funktional vielfältige Landschaften, in: H. Gebhardt, G. Heinritz, A. Mayr, H. Zepp (Eds.), Berichte zur Deutschen Landeskunde, Leipzig, 2001, pp. 33-66.
14. J. Knieling, Leitbildprozesse und Regionalmanagement, Beiträge zur Politikwissenschaft Frankfurt a. M., 2000.
15. Knapp W. A cooperative spatial future for RheinRuhr. European Planning Studies 2004, 12(3):323-349.
16. Klug H. Application of a vision in the Lake District of Salzburg. Futures 2010, 42(7):668-681.
17. K. Fuchs, W. Hacker, S. Pinterits, Natur und Landschaft: Leitbilder für Oberösterreich, Raumeinheit Attersee-Mondsee-Becken, Linz, 2004.
18. H. Gassner, D. Zick, G. Bruschek, I. Frey, K. Mayrhofer, A. Jagsch, Die Wassergüte ausgewählter Seen des oberösterreichscihen und steirischen Salzkammergutes 2001-2005, Wien, 2006.
19. Brandt J., Vejre H. Multifunctional Landscapes: Theory, Values and History 2004, Southhampton.
20. Helming K., Wiggering H. Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes 2003, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 286 pp., ISBN 3-540-00008-9.
21. Multifunctional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services 2007, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-540-36782-8. T. Mander, K. Helming, H. Wiggering (Eds.).
22. D. Dörner, Die Logik des Mißlingens. Strategisches Denken in komplexen Situationen, Hamburg, 1996.
23. P. Lehnes, J. Härtling, Der logische Aufbau von Umweltzielsystemen. Zielkategorien und Transparenz von Abwägungen am Beispiel der " nachhaltigen Entwicklung" , in: G.f. Umweltgeowissenschaften (Eds.), Umweltqualitätsziele - Schritte zu ihrer Umsetzung, Berlin u.a., 1997, pp. 9-49.
24. Chermack T. Improving decision-making with scenario planning. Futures 2004, 36:295-309.
25. Coates J. Scenario Planning. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 2000, 65:115-123.
26. Tress B., Tress G. Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary system approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 57:143-157.
27. Kunzmann K.R. State Planning: A German Success Story?. International Planning Studies 2001, 6(2):153-166.
28. COM, Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment. 276 final, 2002.
29. C.o. Europe, Goteborg Strategy for Sustainable Development, 2001.
30. C.o. Europe, Renewed EU Sustainable Development Strategy, 2006.
31. B. Sadler, R. Verheem, SEA: Status, Challenges and Future Directions. Report 53, Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and Environment, Report, 1996.
32. K. Ehrhardt, M. Nilsson, Strategic Environmental Assessment. Sustainability-A Test. , 2006 (accessed March 2008). http://ivm5.ivm.vu.nl/sat/.
33. Arbter K. SEA and SIA-two participative assessment tools for sustainability. Conference Proceedings of the EASY ECO 2 Conference May 15-17, 2003, 175-181.
34. Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Sustainable impact assessments: limits, thresholds and the sustainable choice space. Sustainability Impact Assessment of Land Use Changes 2007, 425-450. Springer Verlag, Berlin. K. Helming, P. Tabbush, M. Perez-Soba (Eds.).
35. Potschin M., Haines-Young R. Improving the quality of environmental assessments using the concept of natural capital: a case study from southern Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 63(2):93-108.
36. Thérivel R. Quality of Life Capital. Methods of Environmental Impact Assessment 2000, 402-408. Routledge, New York, ISBN-10: 0415239591. 2 edition. P. Morris, R. Thèrivel (Eds.).
37. Albrechts L. In pursuit of new approaches to strategic spatial planning. International Planning Studies 2001, 6(3):293-310.
38. Albrechts L., Healey P., Kunzmann K.R. Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association 2003, 69(2):113-129.
39. E. Commission, European Spatial Development Perspective (ESPD). , 1999 (accessed March 2008). http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/official/reports/pdf/sum_en.pdf.
40. Healey P. The treatment of space and place in the new spatial planning in Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2004, 28(1):45-67.
41. Gaede M., Potschin M. Requirements on the Leitbild-term-a planning perspective. Berichte zur Deutschen Landeskunde 2001, 75(1):19-32.
42. Treweek J. Ecological Impact Assessment 1999, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
43. W. Sheate, S. Dagg, J. Richardson, R. Aschemann, J. Palerm, U. Steen, Main Report European Commission Contract No. B4-3040/99/136634/MAR/B4 Imperial College Consultants ICON. Available online. URL, 2001 (accessed 19 May 2008). http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/eia/sea-support.htm%23int.
44. DETR [Department of Environment, Transport and the Resources], Good Practice Guide on Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Planning Guidance. Publisher: Stationery Office Books, 39 pages, ISBN-10: 0117535680, 2000.
45. H. Klug, The Leitbild concept: A holistic transdisciplinary approach for landscape planning, PhD Thesis submitted to the University of Salzburg, June 2006.