Modelling the evolution of a bipartite network-Peer referral in interlocking directorates

Social Networks

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 309-322

  Koskinen, Johan ^a,b   Edling, Christofer ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^c JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Bipartite graphs; Interlocking directorates; Longitudinal network data; Prediction; Stochastic actor oriented models

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861339055     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Barnes C.R., Ritter E.R. Networks of corporate interlocking: 1962-1995. Critical Sociology 2001, 27:192-220.
2. Bohman L. Economic action and interfirm relations: diffusion of stock repurchases on the Stockholm Stock Exchange 2000-2003. European Sociological Review 2006, 22:383-396.
3. Bohman, L., 2009. Interlocking directorates and director recruitment. Unpublished manuscript. Stockholm University.
4. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Social Networks 1997, 19:243-269.
5. Breiger R.L. Duality of Persons and Groups. Social Forces 1974, 53:181-190.
6. Breiger R.L., Pattison P.E. Cumulated social roles-the duality of persons and their algebras. Social Networks 1986, 8:215-256.
7. Butts C.T. A relational event framework for social action. Sociological Methodology 2008, 38:155-200.
8. Carpenter M.A., Westphal J.D. The strategic context of external network ties: examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44:639-660.
9. Doreian P. On the delineation of small group structures. Classifying Social Data 1979, Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco. H.C. Hudson (Ed.).
10. Edling C., Sandell R. Social influence and corporate behaviour-a case study of interdependent decision-making in Sweden's publicly traded firms. European Sociological Review 2001, 17:389-399.
11. Feld S.L. The focused organization of social ties. American Journal of Sociology 1981, 86:1015-1035.
12. Fich E.M., White L.J. CEO compensation and turnover: the effects of mutually interlocking. Wake Forest Law Review 2003, 38:935-959.
13. Fich E.M., White L.J. Why do CEOs reciprocally sit on each other's boards?. Journal of Corporate Finance 2005, 11:175-195.
14. Frank O., Carrington P.J. Estimation of offending and co-offending using available data with model support. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2007, 31:1-46.
15. Frank O., Strauss D. Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1986, 81:832-842.
16. Freeman L.C., White D.R. Using galois lattices to represent network data. Sociological Methodology 1993, 127-146. vol. 23 23.
17. Galaskiewicz J., Wasserman S. A dynamic study of change in a regional corporate network. American Sociological Review 1981, 46:475-484.
18. Galaskiewicz J., Wasserman S., Rauschenbach B., Bielefeld W., Mullaney P. The influence of corporate-power, social-status, and market position on corporate interlocks in a regional network. Social Forces 1985, 64:403-431.
19. Holland P.W., Leinhardt S. Dynamic-model for social Networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1977, 5:5-20.
20. Holland P.W., Leinhardt S. Social-structure as a network process. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie 1977, 6:386-402.
21. Huisman M., Snijders T.A.B. Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition. Sociological Methods & Research 2003, 32:253-287.
22. Izraeli D.N., Talmud I. Getting aboard: mode of recruitment and gender composition: the case of women directors in Israel. International Review of Women and Leadership 1997, 2:26-45.
23. Kanter R.M. Men and Women of the Corporation 1977, Basic books, New York.
24. Kaplan S.N., Reishus D. Outside directorships and corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 1990, 27:389-410.
25. Katz L., Proctor C.H. The concept of configuration of interpersonal-relations in a group as a time-dependent stochastic-process. Psychometrika 1959, 24:317-327.
26. Koskinen, J.H., 2004. Bayesian inference for longitudinal social networks. Research report 2004:4. Stockholm University, Department of statistics. Available at http://gauss.stat.su.se/site/pdfer/RR2004_4.pdf.
27. Koskinen, J.H., Edling, C., 2004. The evolution of interlockig directorates. Paper presented at the XXIV International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, May 12-16, 2004, PortoroŽ, Slovenia.
28. Koskinen J.H., Snijders T.A.B. Bayesian inference for dynamic social network data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2007, 137:3930-3938.
29. Leenders R. Models for network dynamics-a Markovian framework. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1995, 20:1-21.
30. Mayer T.F. Parties and networks-stochastic-models for relationship networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1984, 10:51-103.
31. Mills C.W. The Power Elite 1956, Oxford University Press, New York.
32. Mizruchi M.S. What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology 1996, 22:271-298.
33. Mizruchi M.S., Stearns L.B. A longitudinal-study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly 1988, 33:194-210.
34. Newman M.E.J., Strogatz S.H., Watts D.J. Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. Physical Review E 2001, 64:026118.
35. Ornstein M.D. Interlocking directorates in canada-evidence from replacement patterns. Social Networks 1982, 4:3-25.
36. Ornstein M.D. Interlocking directorates in Canada: intercorporate or class alliance?. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29:210-231.
37. Palmer D. Broken ties-interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly 1983, 28:40-55.
38. Palmer D., Singh J.V., Friedland R. The ties that bind-organizational and class bases of stability in a corporate interlock network. American Sociological Review 1986, 51:781-796.
39. Pattison P., Robins G. Neighborhood-based models for social networks. Sociological Methodology 2002 2002, 301-337. Vol32 32.
40. Podolny J.M. Status Signals: A Sociological Study of Market Competition 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
41. Robins G., Pattison P. Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2001, 25:5-41.
42. Robins G.L., Alexander M. Small worlds among interlocking directors: network structure and distance in bipartite graphs. Journal of Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 2004, 69-94.
43. Ruigrok W., Peck S.I., Keller H. Board characteristics and involvement in strategic decision making: evidence from Swiss companies. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43:1201-1226.
44. Sanil A., Banks D., Carley K. Models for evolving fixed node networks-model-fitting and model testing. Social Networks 1995, 17:65-81.
45. Skvoretz J., Faust K. Logit models for affiliation networks. Sociological Methodology 1999, 253-280. Vol 29 29.
46. Small H. Cocitation in scientific literature-new measure of relationship between 2 documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1973, 24:265-269.
47. Smangs M. The nature of the business group: a social network perspective. Organization 2006, 13:889-909.
48. Snijders T.A.B. Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1996, 21:149-172.
49. Snijders T.A.B. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology 2001, 361-395. Vol 31 31.
50. Snijders T.A.B. Models for longitudinal network data. Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis 2005, 215-247. Cambridge University Press, New York. P.J. Carrington, J. Scott, S. Wasserman (Eds.).
51. Snijders T.A.B. Statistical methods for network dynamics. Proceedings of the XLIII Scientific Meeting 2006, 281-296. Italian statistical society, CLEUP, Padova (It.). S.R. Luchini (Ed.).
52. Snijders, T.A.B., Koskinen, J., Schweinberger, M., in press. Maximum likelihood estimation for social network dynamics. The Annals of Applied Statistics. DOI: 10.1214/09-AOAS313.
53. Snijders T.A.B., Pattison P., Robins G.L., Handcock M. New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology 2006, 36:99-153.
54. Snijders T.A.B., Steghlich C.E.G., Schweinberger M., Huisman M. Manual for Siena Version 3.1 2007, Groningen/Oxford, ICS Department of Sociology/Department of Statistics.
55. Snijders T.A.B., van Duijn M. Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models. Simulating Social Phenomena 1997, 493-512. Springer, Berlin. R. Conte, R. Hegselmann, P. Terna (Eds.).
56. Stafsudd A. People are strange when you are a stranger: senior executives select similar successors. European Management Review 2006, 3:177-189.
57. Useem M. The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K. 1984, Oxford University Press, New York.
58. Wang P., Sharpe K., Robins G.L., Pattison P.E. Exponential random graph (p*) models for affiliation networks. Social Networks 2009, 31:12-25.
59. Wasserman S. Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1980, 75:280-294.
60. Wasserman S. A stochastic model for directed graphs with transition rates determined by reciprocity. Sociological Methodology 1980, 11:392-412.
61. Wasserman S., Iacobucci D. Sequential social network analysis. Psychometrika 1988, 53:261-282.
62. Zajac E.J., Westphal J.D. The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large US corporations-when is more not better. Strategic Management Journal 1994, 15:121-142.