Random graph models for temporal processes in social networks

Journal of Mathematical Sociology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 5-41

  Robins, Garry ^a   Pattison, Philippa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035648177     PISSN: 0022250X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990243     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: the contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces, 75: 1149-1182.
2. Banks, D. L. and Carley, K. M. (1997). Models for network evolution. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 209-232). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
3. Besag, J. E. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36: 96-127.
4. Besag, J. E. (1975). Statistical analysis of non-lattice data. The Statistician, 24: 179-195.
5. Besag, J. E. (1977). Efficiency of pseudo-likelihood estimation for simple Gaussian random fields. Biometrika, 64: 616-618.
6. Corander, J., Dahmström, K. and Dahmström, P. (1998). Maximum likelihood estimation for Markov graphs. Unpublished technical report, Department of Statistics, Stockholm University.
7. Crouch, B. and Wasserman, S. (1998). Fitting p*: Monte Carlo maximum likelihood estimation. Paper presented at International Conference on Social Networks, Sitges, Spain, May 28-31.
8. Doreian, P. and Stokman, F. N. (1997). The dynamics and evolution of social networks. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 1-17). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
9. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103: 281-317.
10. Frank, O. (1991). Statistical analysis of change in networks. Statistica Neerlandica, 45: 283-293.
11. Frank, O. and Strauss, D. (1986). Markov graphs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81: 832-842.
12. Freeman, S. C. and Freeman, L. C. (1979). The networkers network: A study of the impact of a new communications medium on sociometric structure. Social Science Research Reports No. 46. Irvine, CA: University of California.
13. Holland, P. W. and Leinhardt, S. (1981). An exponential family of probability distributions for directed graphs (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76: 33-65.
14. Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15. Lauritzen, S. L. and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1988). Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 50: 157-224.
16. Leenders, R. Th. A. J. (1997a). Longitudinal behavior of network structure and actor attributes: modeling interdependence of contagion and selection. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 165-184). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
17. Leenders, R. Th. A. J. (1997b). Evolution of friendship choices. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 149-164). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
18. Mische, A. and Pattison, P. (2000). The dynamics of political mediation: Global structures, local processes I: Global configurations: Settings of student activism in the Brazilian impeachment movement. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University.
19. Mische, A. and Robins, G. (2000). The dynamics of political mediation: Global structures, local processes II: Action, identity, and representation in political mobilization. Unpublished manuscript, Rutgers University.
20. Padgett, J. F. and Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98: 1259-1319.
21. Pattison, P. and Robins, G. L. (2000). Neighbourhood-based models for social networks: beyond Markovian neighbourhoods. Submitted to Sociological Methodology.
22. Pattison, P. and Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: II. Multivariate relations. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52: 169-193.
23. Robins, G. L. (1998). Personal attributes in interpersonal contexts: Statistical models for individual characteristics and social relationships. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Melbourne.
24. Robins, G. L., Elliott, P. and Pattison, P. (2000). Network models for social selection processes. Submitted to Social Networks.
25. Robins, G. L., Pattison, P. and Elliott, P. (in press). Network models for social influence processes. Psychometrika.
26. Robins, G. L., Pattison, P. and Wasserman, S. (1999). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: III. Valued relations. Psychometrika, 64: 371-394.
27. Snijders, T. A. B. (1995). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. In M. G. Everett and K. Renolls (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Networks, London, July, 1995 (Vol. 1, pp. 61-68). London: Greenwich University Press.
28. Snijders, T. A. B. (1997). Stochastic actor-oriented models for network change. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 185-208). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
29. Snijders, T. A. B. (2000). Another Markov Chain Monte Carlo method for fitting the p* model. Paper presented at the International Sunbelt Social Network Conference, Vancouver, April, 2000.
30. Snijders, T. A. B. and van Duijn, M. A. J. (1997). Simulation for statistical inference in dynamic network models. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann and P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena (pp. 493-512). Berlin: Springer.
31. Stokman, F. N. and Doreian, P. (1997). Evolution of social networks: processes and principles. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 233-250). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
32. Stokman, F. N. and Zeggelink, E. P. H. (1997). Is politics power or policy oriented? A comparative analysis of dynamic access models in policy networks. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 93-127). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
33. Strauss, D. and Ikeda, M. (1990). Pseudolikelihood estimation for social networks. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85: 204-212.
34. Suitor, J. J., Wellman, B. and Morgan, D. L. (1997). It's about time: how, why, and when networks change. Social Networks, 19: 1-7.
35. Van de Bunt, G. G., Van Duijn, M. A. J. and Snijders, T. A. B. (1999). Friendship networks through time: An actor-oriented dynamic statistical network model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 5: 167-192.
36. Wasserman, S. (1980). Analyzing social networks as stochastic processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75: 280-294.
37. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Wasserman, S. and Iacobucci, D. (1988). Sequential social network data. Psychometrika, 53: 261-282.
39. Wasserman, S. and Pattison, P. (1996). Logit models and logistic regressions for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika, 61: 401-425.
40. Wermuth, N. and Lauritzen, S. L. (1990). On susbstantive research hypotheses, conditional independence graphs and graphical chain models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B), 52: 21-50.
41. Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Zeggelink, E. P. H. (1994). Dynamics of structure: an individual oriented approach. Social Networks, 16: 295-333.
43. Zeggelink, E. P. H. (1995). Evolving friendship network: an individual-oriented approach implementing similarity. Social Networks, 17: 83-110.
44. Zeggelink, E. P. H., Stokman, F. N. and Van de Bunt, G. G. (1997). The emergence of groups in the evolution of friendship networks. In P. Doreian and F. N. Stokman (Eds.), Evolution of Social Networks (pp. 45-71). Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.