Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with nanophthalmos

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 806-810

  Altan, Cigdem ^a   Kara, Necip ^b   Baz, Okkes ^a   Şatana, Banu ^a   Demirok, Ahmet ^a   Yilmaz, Omer Faruk ^a  

^a Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

^b Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Education and Research Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; CORNEA THICKNESS; CORNEAL COMPENSATED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; CORNEAL HYSTERESIS; CORNEAL RESISTANCE FACTOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; FEMALE; GOLDMANN CORRELATED INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MICROPHTHALMIA; OCULOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCHOOL CHILD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AXIAL LENGTH, EYE; BIOMECHANICS; CHILD; CORNEA; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; MALE; MICROPHTHALMOS; ORGAN SIZE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TONOMETRY, OCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861332397     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300557     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Brockhurst RJ. Nanophthalmos with uveal effusion. A new clinical entity. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:1989-99.
2. Singh OS, Sofinski SJ. Anomalies in the size of the eye. In: Duke-Elder S, ed. System of Ophthalmology. Vol. 3. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1963:488-95.
3. Kimbrough RL, Trempe CS, Brockhurst RJ, et al. Angle-closure glaucoma in nanophthalmos. Am J Ophthalmol 1979;88:572-9. (Pubitemid 9231708)
4. O'Grady RB. Nanophthalmos. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;71:1252-3.
5. Brockhurst RJ. Cataract surgery in nanophthalmic eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:965-7. (Pubitemid 20216015)
6. Srinivasan S, Batterbury M, Marsh IB, et al. Corneal topographic features in a family with nanophthalmos. Cornea 2006;25:750-6. (Pubitemid 44671871)
7. Buys YM, Pavlin CJ. Retinitis pigmentosa, nanophthalmos and optic disc drusen. A case report. Ophthalmology 1999;106:619-22. (Pubitemid 30191602)
8. Bessant DAR, Anwar K, Khaliq S, et al. Phenotype of autosomal recessive congenital microphthalmia mapping to chromosome 14q32. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:919-22. (Pubitemid 29376025)
9. Fontes BM, Ambrósio R Jr, Jardim D, et al. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology 2010;117:673-9.
10. Prata TS, Sousa AK, Garcia Filho CA, et al. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Can J Ophthalmol 2009;44:602.
11. Goldich Y, Barkana Y, Gerber Y, et al. Effect of diabetes mellitus on biomechanical parameters of the cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:715-19.
12. Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:156-62. (Pubitemid 40260703)
13. Duke-Elder S. Pathological refractive errors. Chapter 7. In: Duke-Elder S, ed. System of Ophthalmology. Vol. 3. St. Louis: Mosby, 1964.
14. Singh OS, Sofinski SJ. Nanophthalmos: guidelines for diagnosis and therapy. Chapter 135. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, eds. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology. Vol. 3. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1994:1528-40.
15. Ryan E, Zwaan J, Chylack L. Nanopthalmos with uveal effusion. Clinical and embryologic considerations. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1013-17. (Pubitemid 12001630)
16. Faucher A, Hasanee K, Rootman DS. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in nanophthalmic eyes: report of a medium-size series. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;27:968.
17. Yalvac IS, Satana B, Ozkan G, et al. Management of glaucoma in patients with nanophthalmos. Eye 2007;9:1-6.
18. Merkur A, Damji KF, Mintsioulis G, et al. Intraocular pressure decrease after phacoemulsification in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:528-32.
19. Duke-Elder S. Anomalies in the size of the eye. In: Duke-Elder S, ed. System of Ophthalmology. Vol. 3. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1964:488.
20. Singh OS, Simmons RJ, Brockhurst RJ, et al. Nanophthalmos: a perspective on identification and therapy. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1006-12.
21. Brockhurst RJ. Nanophthalmos with uveal effusion; a new clinical entity. Arch Ophthalmol 1975;93:1289-99; correction 1976;94:583.
22. Cross HE, Yoder F. Familial nanophthalmos. Am J Ophthalmol 1976;81:300-6.
23. Hirsch SE, Waltman SR, LaPiana FG. Bilateral nanophthalmos. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;89:353.
24. Brockhurst RJ. Nanophthalmos with uveal effusion: a new clinical entity. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1974;72:371-403.
25. Narayanaswamy A, Chung RS, Wu RY, et al. Determinants of corneal biomechanical properties in an adult Chinese population. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1253-9.
26. Congdon NG, Broman AT, Bandeen-Roche K, et al. Central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis associated with glaucoma damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:868-75.
27. Kamiya K, Hagishima M, Fujimura F, et al. Factors affecting corneal hysteresis in normal eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:1491-4.
28. Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Cunliffe I, et al. The use of the Reichert ocular response analyser to establish the relationship between ocular hysteresis, corneal resistance factor and central corneal thickness in normal eyes. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2006;29:257-62. (Pubitemid 44743122)
29. Leite MT, Alencar LM, Gore C, et al. Comparison of corneal biomechanical properties between healthy blacks and whites using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:163-8.
30. Yue BY, Duvall J, Goldberg MF, et al. Nanophthalmic sclera; morphologic and tissue culture studies. Ophthalmology 1986;93:534-41. (Pubitemid 16111120)
31. Yue B, Kurosawa A, Duvall J, et al. Nanophthalmic sclera; fibronectin studies. Ophthalmology 1988;95:56-60.
32. Stewart DH III, Streeten BW, Brockhurst RJ, et al. Abnormal scleral collagen in nanophthalmos; an ultrastructural study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:1017-25.
33. Yamani A, Wood I, Sugino I, et al. Abnormal collagen fibrils in nanophthalmos: a clinical and histologic study. Am J Ophthalmol 1999;127:106-7.
34. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000;44:367-408. (Pubitemid 30151145)
35. Liu J, Roberts CJ. Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-55. (Pubitemid 40260702)
36. Narayanaswamy A, Su DH, Baskaran M, et al. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in chinese subjects with primary angle-closure and primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:429-34.
37. Harada Y, Naoi N. Corneal elasticity as a measure of intra-ocular pressure: a controlled clinical examination. Kobe J Med Sci 2004;50:141-52. (Pubitemid 41283767)