Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 602-

  Prata, Tiago S ^a,b   Sousa, Aline K ^a   Garcia Filho, Carlos A A ^a   Doi, Larissa M ^a   Paranhos Jr , Augusto ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYZER; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA THICKNESS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; KERATITIS; LETTER; OCULAR RESPONSE ANALYZER; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; TONOMETER; TONOMETRY; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 70349440986     PISSN: 00084182     EISSN: 17153360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3129/i09-082     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Harper SL, Foster CS. The ocular manifestations of rheumatoid disease. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1998;38:1-19.
2. Hager A, Loge K, Schroeder B, Füllhas MO, Wiegand W. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes. J Glaucoma 2008;17:361-365
3. Lim LS, Gazzard G, Chan YH, et al. Cornea biomechanical characteristics and their correlates with refractive error in Singapore children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:3852-3857
4. Katz J. Two eyes or one? The data analyst's dilemma. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;19:585-589
5. Villani E, Galimberti D, Viola F, Mapelli C, Del Papa N, Ratiglia R. Corneal involvement in rheumatoid arthritis: an in vivo confocal study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008;49:560-564