Cross cultural differences in unconscious knowledge

Cognition

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 16-24

  Kiyokawa, Sachiko ^a   Dienes, Zoltán ^b   Tanaka, Daisuke ^c   Yamada, Ayumi ^d   Crowe, Louise ^b  

^a CHUBU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^c TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d AOYAMA GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Artificial grammar learning; Cultural differences; Global local; Implicit learning; Selective attention; Unconscious knowledge

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS CULTURAL DIFFERENCE; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; HUMAN; JAPANESE; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNCONSCIOUS KNOWLEDGE; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTENTION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; CULTURE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; JAPAN; LEARNING; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861232303     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Chua H.F., Boland J.E., Nisbett R.E. Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2005, 102(35):12629-12633.
2. Cleeremans A. Consciousness: The radical plasticity thesis. Progress in Brain Science 2008, 168:19-33.
3. Dienes Z. Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. Progress in Brain Research 2008, 168:49-64.
4. Dienes Z. Conscious versus unconscious learning of structure. Statistical Learning and Language Acquisition 2012, Mouton de Gruyter Publishers. P. Rebuschat, J. Williams (Eds.).
5. Dienes Z., Scott R. Measuring unconscious knowledge: Distinguishing structural knowledge and judgment knowledge. Psychological Research 2005, 69:338-351.
6. Eitam B., Schul Y., Hassin R.R. Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:228-238.
7. Hochberg Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1988, 75:800-802.
8. Jiménez L., Méndez C. Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:236-259.
9. Kitayama S., Duffy S., Kawamura T., Larsen J.T. Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at New Look. Psychological Science 2003, 14(3):201-206.
10. Lewis R.S., Goto S.G., Kong L.L. Culture and context: East Asian American and European American differences in P3 event-related potentials and self-construal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2008, 34:623-634.
11. Masuda T., Nisbett R.E. Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:922-934.
12. Mayr U. Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and non spatial sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1996, 22:350-364.
13. Miyamoto Y., Nisbett R.E., Masuda T. Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science 2006, 17(2):113-119.
14. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 1977, 9:353-383.
15. Navon D. What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind?. Acta Psychologica 2003, 114:273-309.
16. Nisbett R.E. The geography of thought: How Asians and westerners think differently 2003, Free Press, New York.
17. Nisbett R.E., Miyamoto Y. The influence of culture: Holistic versus analytic perception. Trends in Cognitive Science 2005, 9:467-473.
18. Nisbett R.E., Peng K., Choi I., Norenzayan A. Culture and systems of thought: Holistic vs. analytic cognition. Psychological Review 2001, 108:291-310.
19. Norman E., Price M.C., Jones E. Measuring strategic control in artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20(4):1920-1929.
20. Reber A.S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1967, 6:855-863.
21. Reber A.S. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1989, 118:219-235.
22. Reber A.S., Allen R. Analogy and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functional interpretation. Cognition 1978, 6:189-221.
23. Rosenthal D.M. Consciousness and mind 2005, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Rowland L.A., Shanks D.R. Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2006, 13:643-648.
25. Scott R.B., Dienes Z. The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:1264-1288.
26. Scott R.B., Dienes Z. Knowledge applied to new domains: The unconscious succeeds where the conscious fails. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:391-398.
27. Scott R.B., Dienes Z. Prior familiarity with components enhances unconscious learning of relations. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19:413-418.
28. Shanks D.R. Implicit learning. Handbook of cognition 2005, 202-220. Sage, London. K. Lamberts, R.L. Goldstone (Eds.).
29. Smith J.G., McDowall J. The implicit sequence learning deficit in patients with Parkinson's disease: A matter of impaired sequence integration?. Neuropsychologia 2005, 44:275-288.
30. Tanaka D., Kiyokawa S., Yamada A., Dienes Z., Shigemasu K. Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 2008, 15:1154-1159.
31. Turk-Browne N.B., Jungé J.A., Scholl B.J. The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2005, 134(4):552-564.
32. Wan L.L., Dienes Z., Fu X.L. Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17:1209-1218.
33. Whittlesea B.W.A., Dorken M.D. Incidentally, things in general are particularly determined: An episodic-processing account of implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1993, 122:227-248.