Low-frequency modulated quadratic and cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans

Hearing Research

Volumn 287, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 91-101

  Drexl, Markus ^a   Gürkov, Robert ^a   Krause, Eike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CUBIC DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INNER EAR DISEASE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUADRATIC DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ACOUSTICS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PRESSURE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TRANSDUCERS, PRESSURE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84861190257     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Abel C., Wittekindt A., Kössl M. Contralateral acoustic stimulation modulates low-frequency biasing of DPOAE: efferent influence on cochlear amplifier operating state?. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 101:2362-2371.
2. Bian L. Cochlear compression: effects of low-frequency biasing on quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emission. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 116:3559-3571.
3. Bian L., Scherrer N.M. Low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 122:1681.
4. Bian L., Chen S. Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 124:3739-3750.
5. Bian L., Chertoff M.E., Miller E. Deriving a cochlear transducer function from low-frequency modulation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2002, 112:198-210.
6. Bian L., Linhardt E.E., Chertoff M.E. Cochlear hysteresis: observation with low-frequency modulated distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115:2159-2172.
7. Brown A.M., Kemp D.T. Suppressibility of the 2f1 - f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear Res. 1984, 13:29-37.
8. Brown A.M., Harris F.P., Beveridge H.A. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 100:3260-3267.
9. Brown D.J., Gibson W.P. On the differential diagnosis of Meniere's disease using low-frequency acoustic biasing of the 2f1 - f2 DPOAE. Hear Res. 2011, 282:119-127.
10. Brown D.J., Hartsock J.J., Gill R.M., Fitzgerald H.E., Salt A.N. Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125:2129-2145.
11. Crawford A.C., Evans M.G., Fettiplace R. Activation and adaptation of transducer currents in turtle hair cells. J. Physiol. 1989, 419:405-434.
12. Frank G., Kössl M. The acoustic two-tone distortions 2f1 - f2 and f2 - f1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier. Hear Res. 1996, 98(1-2):115.
13. Frank G., Kössl M. Acoustical and electrical biasing of the cochlea partition. Effects on the acoustic two tone distortions f2 - f1 and 2f1 - f2. Hear Res. 1997, 113:57-68.
14. Hensel J., Scholz G., Hurttig U., Mrowinski D., Janssen T. Impact of infrasound on the human cochlea. Hear Res. 2007, 233:67-76.
15. Hirschfelder A., Gossow-Muller-Hohenstein E., Hensel J., Scholz G., Mrowinski D. Diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops using low frequency modulated distortion product otoacoustic emissions. HNO 2005, 53:612-617.
16. Hughes J.R. Auditory sensitization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1954, 26:1064-1070.
17. Janssen T., Kummer P., Arnold W. Growth behavior of the 2f1 - f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:3418-3430.
18. Janssen T., Niedermeyer H.P., Arnold W. Diagnostics of the cochlear amplifier by means of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. ORL J. Otorhinolaryngol. Relat. Spec. 2006, 68:334-339.
19. Kemp D.T. Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes. Hear Res. 1980, 2:533-548.
20. Kemp D.T. Otoacoustic emissions, travelling waves and cochlear mechanisms. Hear Res. 1986, 22:95-104.
21. Kemp D.T. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br. Med. Bull. 2002, 63:223-241.
22. Kirk D.L., Patuzzi R.B. Transient changes in cochlear potentials and DPOAEs after low-frequency tones: the 'two-minute bounce' revisited. Hear Res. 1997, 112:49-68.
23. Kirk D.L., Moleirinho A., Patuzzi R.B. Microphonic and DPOAE measurements suggest a micromechanical mechanism for the 'bounce' phenomenon following low-frequency tones. Hear Res. 1997, 112:69-86.
24. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. A descriptive model of the receptor potential nonlinearities generated by the hair cell mechanoelectrical transducer. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 103:973-980.
25. Lukashkin A.N., Russell I.J. Dependence of the DPOAE amplitude pattern on acoustical biasing of the cochlear partition. Hear Res. 2005, 203:45-53.
26. Marquardt T., Hensel J., Mrowinski D., Scholz G. Low-frequency characteristics of human and guinea pig cochleae. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:3628-3638.
27. Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., Scheinin S.A., Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear Res. 1987, 28:191-208.
28. Moulin A. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 107:1460-1470.
29. Noffsinger P.D., Olsen W.O. Postexposure responsiveness in the auditory system. II. Sensitization and desensitization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1970, 47:552-564.
30. Noffsinger P.D., Tillman T.W. Postexposure responsiveness in the auditory system. I. Immediate sensitization. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1970, 47:546-551.
31. Rotter A., Weikert S., Hensel J., Scholz G., Scherer H., Holzl M. Low-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission test compared to ECoG in diagnosing endolymphatic hydrops. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2008, 265:643-649.
32. Salt A.N., Hullar T.E. Responses of the ear to low frequency sounds, infrasound and wind turbines. Hear Res. 2010, 268:12-21.
33. Scholz G., Hirschfelder A., Marquardt T., Hensel J., Mrowinski D. Low-frequency modulation of the 2f1 - f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the human ear. Hear Res. 1999, 130:189-196.
34. Siegel J.H., Hirohata E.T. Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies. Hear Res. 1994, 80:146-152.
35. Sirjani D.B., Salt A.N., Gill R.M., Hale S.A. The influence of transducer operating point on distortion generation in the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2004, 115:1219-1229.
36. Verpy E., Weil D., Leibovici M., Goodyear R.J., Hamard G., Houdon C., Lefevre G.M., Hardelin J.P., Richardson G.P., Avan P., Petit C. Stereocilin-deficient mice reveal the origin of cochlear waveform distortions. Nature 2008, 456:255-258.