Low-frequency modulation of the 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the human ear

Hearing Research

Volumn 130, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 189-196

  Scholz, Günther ^a   Hirschfelder, Anke ^a   Marquardt, Torsten ^a   Hensel, Johannes ^a   Mrowinski, Dieter ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distortion product otoacoustic emission; Human ear; Low frequency modulation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY MASKING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FREQUENCY ANALYZER; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HAIR CELL; HUMAN; INNER EAR; LATENT PERIOD; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; EAR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 0032960246     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00010-6     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brass D., Kemp D.T. Time-domain observations of otoacoustic emissions during constant tone stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:1991;2415-2427.
2. Crawford A.C., Evans M.G., Fettiplace R. Activation and adaptation of transducer currents in turtle hair cells. J. Physiol. 419:1989;405-434.
3. Dallos P. Low-frequency auditory characteristics: Species dependence. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48:1970;489-499.
4. Dallos P., Evans B.N., Hallworth R. Nature of the motor element in electrokinetic shape change of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature. 350:1991;155-157.
5. 1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier. Hear. Res. 98:1996;104-115.
6. 2. Hear. Res. 113:1997;57-68.
7. Gerull G., Mrowinski D., Nubel K. Low-frequency masking of brainstem potentials. Scand. Audiol. 20:1991;227-234.
8. Hoth S., Weber F. Die Latenzzeit otoakustischer Emissionen, ihre Beziehung zur Latenz evozierter Potentiale und ihre Beeinflussung durch kochleäre Funktionsstörungen. HNO. 45:1997;285.
9. Housley G.D., Ashmore J.F. Ionic currents of outer hair cells isolated from the guinea-pig cochlea. J. Physiol. 448:1992;73-98.
10. Howard J., Hudspeth A.J. Compliance of the hair bundle associated with gating of mechanoelectrical transduction channels in the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. Neuron. 1:1988;189-199.
11. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:1998;3418-3430.
12. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:1998;3431-3444.
13. Morizono T., Sikora M.A. Neurophysiologic assessment for endolymphatic hydrops. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 93:1984;225-228.
14. Mrowinski D., Gerull G., Nubel K., Scholz G. Masking and pitch shift of tone bursts and clicks by low-frequency tones. Hear. Res. 85:1995;95-102.
15. Mrowinski D., Scholz G., Krompaß S., Nubel K. Diagnosis of endolymphatic hydrops by low-frequency masking. Audiol. Neurootol. 1:1996;125-134.
16. Nubel K., Kabudwand E.A., Scholz G., Mrowinski D. Diagnostik des endolymphatischen Hydrops mit tieftonmaskierten otoakustischen Emissionen. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 74:1995;651-656.
17. Patuzzi, R., 1996. Cochlear micromechanics and macromechanics. In: Dallos, P., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), The Cochlea. Springer, New York, pp. 186-257.
18. Patuzzi R., Rajan R. Additivity of threshold elevations produced by disruption of outer hair cell function. Hear. Res. 60:1992;165-177.
19. Popelka G.R., Osterhammel P.A., Nielsen L.H., Rasmussen A.N. Growth of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with primary-tone level in humans. Hear. Res. 71:1993;12-22.
20. 2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91:1992;1587-1606.
21. Zwicker E. Masking period patterns produced by very low-frequency maskers and their possible relation to basilar membrane displacement. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61:1977;1031-1040.
22. Zwicker E. Masking-period patterns and cochlear acoustical responses. Hear. Res. 4:1981;195-202.
23. Zwicker E., Stecker M., Hind J. Relations between masking, otoacoustic emissions, and evoked potentials. Acustica. 64:1987;102-109.