A new web designed material approach on learning and assessment in science education

Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 567-578

  Tas, Erol ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Achievement; Attitude; Matter and heat; Web designed learning and assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84861173535     PISSN: 13087711     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Gabbard R. Constructivism, hypermedia, and the world wide web. CyberPsychology Behavior 2000;3:103-110.
2. Wen LMC, Tsai CC, Lin HM, Chuang SC. Cognitive metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist internet based learning environments: A lirsel analysis, Comput Educ 2004;43:237-248.
3. Chuang SC, Tsai CC. Preferences toward the constructivist internet based learning environments. Comput Human Behav 2005;36:97-100.
4. Tas, E. Web tasarimli bir fen bilgisi materyalinin gelistirilmesi, uygulanmasi ve degerlendirilmesi. KTU, Doctorate Thesis, Trabzon, 2006 [in Turkish].
5. Hancer AH. Fen egitiminde yapilandi{dotless}rmaci yaklasima dayali bilgisayar destekli ögrenmenin kavram yanilgilari uzerine etkisi. Cumhuriyet Univ Sos Bil Derg 2007;31:69-81.
6. Morrell D. The e. ects of computer-assisted instruction on student achievement in high school biology, School Sci Math 1992;92:177-181.
7. Wainwright CL. The effectiveness of a computer-assisted instruction package in high school chemistry. J Res Sci Teach 1989;26:275-290.
8. Coye RW, Stonebraker PW. The e. ectiveness of personal computers in operations management education. Int J Operat Prod Manage 1994;4:35-46.
9. Tjaden BJ, Martin CD. Learning e. ects of computer-assisted instruction on collage students. Comput Educ 1995;24:221-277.
10. Mayer R. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press. USA, 2001.
11. Baruque LB, Melo RN. Learning theory and instructional design using learning objects. J Educ Multimed Hypermed 2004;13:343-370.
12. Deubel P. An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional design, J Educ Multimed Hypermed 2003;12:63-90.
13. Sahin I. Assessment of new Turkish curriculum for grade 1 to 5. Element Educ Online 2007;6:284-304.
14. Birgin O, Catlioglu, H. Measurement and assessment. J Turkish Sci Educ 2004;6:156-161.
15. Burns M, Heath M, Dimock V. Constructivism and technology. TAP Learn 1998;4:1-8.
16. Calik M. How did creating a constructivist learning environment influence my graduate students' views? Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:1-13.
17. Hendry DG, Frommer M, Walker RA. Constructivism and problembased learning. J Further Higher Educ 1999;23:359-371.
18. Shunk DH. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1996.
19. Demirci C. Constructivist learning approach in science teaching. HU J Educ 2009;37:24-35
20. Herrington J, Herrington A. How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. Higher Educ Res Develop 199817:305-322.
21. Condemarin M, Medina A. Evaluación Auténtica de los Aprendizajes: Un medio para mejorar las competencias en lenguaje y comunicación, Santiago de Chile: Editorial Andrés Bello, 2000.
22. Ministry of National Education. Ilkogretim ve ortaogretim ogretim programi [Primary and secondary school curricula]. Ankara: Devlet Kitaplari Basimevi 2005.
23. Gozutok D, Akgun OE, Karacaoglu C. Yeni ilkogretim programlarinin uygulanmasina ogretmenlerin hazirlanmasi. Egitimde Yansimalar: VIII Yeni Ilkogretim Programlarini Degerlendirme Sempozyumu, Kasim 14-16, Kayseri, 2005 in Turkey.
24. Kilic M. Ogretmenin rolu ve gorevlerine iliskin goruslerin yeni ilkogretim programi cercevesinde degerlendirilmesi, Egitimde Yansimalar: VIII, Yeni Ilkogretim Programlarini Degerlendirme Sempozyumu, Bildiriler Kitabi, 41-50, 2005 in Turkey.
25. Erdemir ZA. Ilkogretim ikinci kademe ogretmenlerinin olcme degerlendirme tekniklerini etkin kullanabilme yeterliklerinin araştirilmasi (Kahramanmaras Ornegi), Master Thesis. KM Univ Kahramanmaras, 2007.
26. Ozsevgec T. Ilkogretim 5. sinif kuvvet ve hareket unitesine yonelik 5 E modeline gore gelistirilen rehber materyallerin etkililiklerinin belirlenmesi. Dissertation, KTU, Trabzon, 2007.
27. Sekel S. Yeni Fen ve Teknoloji Ogretim Programinin Ogretmen Gorusleri Isi{dotless}gi{dotless}nda Degerlendirilmesi; (Gumushane Ili Ornegi). Master Thesis, KTU, Trabzon, 2007.
28. Tatli ZH. Computer based education: Online learning and teaching facilities. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:171-181.
29. Tas E, Kose S, Cepni S. The effects of computer-assisted instruction material on understanding photosynthesis subject. Int J Environ Sci Educ 2006;1:163-171.
30. Chang JY. Teacher college students' conceptions about evaporation, condensation, and boiling. Sci Educ 1999;83:511-526.
31. Tsai C-C. Overcoming junior high school students' misconceptions about microscopic views of phase change: A study of an anology activity. J Sci EducTechnol 1999;8:83-91.
32. Ozmen H. Some students' misconceptions in chemistry: a literature review of chemical bonding. J Sci Educ Technol 2004;13:147-159.
33. Calik M, Ayas A, Coll RK. Enhancing pre-service primary teachers' conceptual understanding of solution chemistry with conceptual change text. Int J Sci Math Educ 2007;5:1-28.
34. Tasdemir A, Demirbas M. Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin fen ve teknoloji dersinde gordukleri konulardaki kavramlari gunluk yasamla iliskilendirebilme duzeyleri. Ulussi Insan Bil Der 2010;7.
35. Koray O, Akyaz N, Koksal MS. Lise ogrencilerinin "cozunurluk" konusunda gunluk yasamla ilgili olaylarda gozlenen kavram yanilgilari (The observed concept errors about the "resolution" subject in the daily life events of the lycee students). Kastamonu Egit Derg 2007;15:241-250.
36. Calik M, Ayas A, Ebenezer JV. A review of solution chemistry studies: insights into students' conceptions. J Sci Educ Technol 2005;14:29-50.
37. diSessa AA. Why conceptual ecology is a good idea. In M. Limon & L. Mason (Eds.), "Reconsidering conceptual change: Issues in theory and practice". Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2002.
38. Ozdemir G. Ogrencilerin kuvvet kavramina iliskin bilgi yapi{dotless}larinin bir analizi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Univ Eg Fak Derg 2007;8:37-54.
39. Ozen R. lkogretim okulu ogretmenlerinin hizmet ici egitim programlarinin etkilerine iliskin gorusleri. Abant Izzet Baysal Univ Egi Fak Derg 2006;6:141-160.
40. Birgin O, Tutak T, Catlioglu H. Teachers' views about in-service training programs related to the new primary school mathematics curriculum: The case of Trabzon. Paper presented at the XI. International Conference on "Further Education in the Balkan Countries", Konya, Turkey, 2008.
41. Birgin O, Gurbuz R. Sinif ogretmeni adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n olcme ve degerlendirme konusundaki bilgi duzeylerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of pre-service primary teachers' knowledge level about measurement and assessment]. Selcuk Univ Sos Bil Enst Derg 2008;20:163-179.
42. Sheremetov L, Arenas AG. EVA: an interactive Web-based collaborative learning environment, Comput Educ 2002;39:161-182.
43. Chou C. Interactivity and interactive functions in web-based learning systems: a technical framework for designers. British J Educ Technol 2003;34:265-279.
44. Braten I, Stromso HI. Epistemological beliefs, interest, and gender as predictors of Internet-based learning activities. Comput Human Behav 2006;22:1027-1042.
45. Paik S, Cho B, Go Y. Korean 4-to 11-year-old student conceptions of heat and temperature. J Res Sci Teach 2007;44:284-302.
46. Kala S, Isaramalai S, Pohthong A. Electronic learning and constructivism: A model for nursing education. Nurse Educ Today 2010;30:61-66.
47. Cepni S. Effects of computer supported instructional material (CSIM) in removing, students misconceptions about concepts: "Light, light source and seeing. " Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2009;1:51-83.
48. Marbach-Ad G, Rotbai Y, Stavy R. Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students' achievement in molecular genetics. J Res Sci Teach 2008;45:273-292.
49. Yigit N, Akdeniz AR. The effect of computer assisted activities on students' gain at physics instruction: electrical circuits example. J Gazi Educ Fac 2003;23:99-113
50. Koral O. The effectiveness of problem-based learning supported with computer simulations on academic performance about buoyancy. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:293-304.
51. Seferoglu SS. A study on teaching competencies of teacher candidates. International Conference on Education (ICE 2005), December 6-9 2005, Singapore: National University of Singapore.
52. Selwyn N. Students' attitudes towards computers in sixteen to nineteen education. Educ Info Technol 1999;4:129-141.
53. Ertepi{dotless}nar H, Demircioglu H, Geban O, Yavuz D. The effect of assimilation and computer based instruction to understand mole concept. III. National Sci Educ Symposium, KTU, Turkey, 1998.
54. Shaw G, Marlow, N. The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning. Com Educ 1999;33:223-234.
55. Colletta AT, Chiappetta EL. Science Introduction in the Middle and Secondary Schools (2nd Ed.). Ohio, USA: Merrill Publishing Company, 1989.
56. Yenice N. Bilgisayar destekli fen bilgisi ogretiminin ogrencilerin fen ve bilgisayar tutumlarina etkisi. Turkish Online J Educ Technol 2003;2.
57. Karaduman B. Ilkogretim 6. Sinif Fen ve Teknoloji Dersi "Maddenin Tanecikli Yapisi" Unitesinin Ogretiminde, Bilgisayar Destekli ve Bilgisayar Temelli Ogretim Yontemlerinin Akademik Basari ve Kaliciliga Etkisi, Master Thesis, Cukurova Univ Sosyal Bil Enst, Adana, 2008 [in Turkish].
58. Yesilyurt M. Meta-analysis of the computer assisted studies in physics: A sample of Turkey. Energy Educ Sci Technol Part B 2011;3:173-182.