Role of the dorsal hippocampus in object memory load

Learning and Memory

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 211-218

  Sannino, Sara ^a,b   Russo, Fabio ^a,b   Torromino, Giulia ^c   Pendolino, Valentina ^d   Calabresi, Paolo ^d   De Leonibus, Elvira ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND BIOPHYSICS ADRIANO BUZZATI TRAVERSO   (Italy)

^b TELETHON INSTITUTE OF GENETICS AND MEDICINE TIGEM   (Italy)

^c SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^d IRCCS FONDAZIONE SANTA LUCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; EXCITOTOXICITY; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SPATIAL MEMORY; STIMULUS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MICE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84861153673     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: 15495485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.025213.111     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ainge JA, Heron-Maxwell C, Theofilas P, Wright P, de Hoz L, Wood ER. 2006. The role of the hippocampus in object recognition in rats: Examination of the influence of task parameters and lesion size. Behav Brain Res 167: 183-195.
2. Alvarez GA, Cavanagh P. 2004. The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychol Sci 15: 106-111. (Pubitemid 38361302)
3. Beason-Held LL, Rosene DL, Killiany RJ, Moss MB. 1999. Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus 9: 562-574. (Pubitemid 29509526)
4. Brebion G. 2003. Working memory, language comprehension, and aging: Four experiments to understand the deficit. Exp Aging Res 29: 269-301. (Pubitemid 36966282)
5. Broadbent NJ, Squire LR, Clark RE. 2004. Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 14515-14520. (Pubitemid 39346780)
6. Brown MW, Aggleton JP. 2001. Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 51-61. (Pubitemid 33673349)
7. Cave CB, Squire LR. 1991. Equivalent impairment of spatial and nonspatial memory following damage to the human hippocampus. Hippocampus 1: 329-340.
8. Clatworthy PL, Lewis SJ, Brichard L, Hong YT, Izquierdo D, Clark L, Cools R, Aigbirhio FI, Baron JC, Fryer TD, et al. 2009. Dopamine release in dissociable striatal subregions predicts the different effects of oral methylphenidate on reversal learning and spatial working memory. J Neurosci 29: 4690-4696.
9. Cowan N. 2001. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav Brain Sci 24: 87-185.
10. Cowan N, Johnson TD, Saults JS. 2005. Capacity limits in list item recognition: Evidence from proactive interference. Memory 13: 293-299. (Pubitemid 40711897)
11. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2006. Why does brain damage impair memory? A connectionist model of object recognition memory in perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci 26: 12186-12197. (Pubitemid 44808385)
12. de Rover M, Pironti VA, McCabe JA, Acosta-Cabronero J, Arana FS, Morein-Zamir S, Hodges JR, Robbins TW, Fletcher PC, Nestor PJ, et al. 2011. Hippocampal dysfunction in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A functional neuroimaging study of a visuospatial paired associates learning task. Neuropsychologia 49: 2060-2070.
13. Dudchenko PA,Wood ER, Eichenbaum H. 2000. Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition, and alternation. J Neurosci 20: 2964-2977. (Pubitemid 30220322)
14. Fischer H, Nyberg L, Karlsson S, Karlsson P, Brehmer Y, Rieckmann A, MacDonald SW, Farde L, Backman L. 2010. Simulating neurocognitive aging: Effects of a dopaminergic antagonist on brain activity during working memory. Biol Psychiatry 67: 575-580.
15. Franklin K, Paksinos G. 1997. The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
16. Heuer E, Bachevalier J. 2011. Effects of selective neonatal hippocampal lesions on tests of object and spatial recognition memory in monkeys. Behav Neurosci 125: 137-149.
17. Hill SK, Griffin GB, Miura TK, Herbener ES, Sweeney JA. 2010. Salience of working-memory maintenance and manipulation deficits in schizophrenia. Psychol Med 40: 1979-1986.
18. Hunsaker MR, Fieldsted PM, Rosenberg JS, Kesner RP. 2008. Dissociating the roles of dorsal and ventral CA1 for the temporal processing of spatial locations, visual objects, and odors. Behav Neurosci 122: 643-650. (Pubitemid 351787842)
19. Kelemen E, Fenton AA. 2010. Dynamic grouping of hippocampal neural activity during cognitive control of two spatial frames. PLoS Biol 8: e1000403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000403.
20. Klann E, Sweatt JD. 2008. Altered protein synthesis is a trigger for long-term memory formation. Neurobiol Learn Mem 89: 247-259. (Pubitemid 351318266)
21. Kumaran D, Maguire EA. 2007. Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection? Hippocampus 17: 735-748. (Pubitemid 47493455)
22. Lee I, Hunsaker MR, Kesner RP. 2005. The role of hippocampal subregions in detecting spatial novelty. Behav Neurosci 119: 145-153. (Pubitemid 40279505)
23. Lee EY, Cowan N, Vogel EK, Rolan T, Valle-Inclan F, Hackley SA. 2010. Visual working memory deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease are due to both reduced storage capacity and impaired ability to filter out irrelevant information. Brain 133: 2677-2689.
24. Levy DA, Manns JR, Hopkins RO, Gold JJ, Broadbent NJ, Squire LR. 2003. Impaired visual and odor recognition memory span in patients with hippocampal lesions. Learn Mem 10: 531-536. (Pubitemid 37499782)
25. Levy DA, Hopkins RO, Squire LR. 2004. Impaired odor recognition memory in patients with hippocampal lesions. Learn Mem 11: 794-796. (Pubitemid 39602520)
26. Luck SJ, Vogel EK. 1997. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390: 279-281.
27. Miller G. 1956. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 2: 81-97.
28. Moss MB, Albert MS, Butters N, Payne M. 1986. Differential patterns of memory loss among patients with Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease, and alcoholic Korsakoff's syndrome. Arch Neurol 43: 239-246. (Pubitemid 16117835)
29. Nilsson LG. 2003. Memory function in normal aging. Acta Neurol Scand 179: 7-13.
30. Sargolini F, Florian C, Oliverio A, Mele A, Roullet P. 2003. Differential involvement of NMDA and AMPA receptors within the nucleus accumbens in consolidation of information necessary for place navigation and guidance strategy of mice. Learn Mem 10: 285-292. (Pubitemid 37013068)
31. Shrager Y, Levy DA, Hopkins RO, Squire LR. 2008. Working memory and the organization of brain systems. J Neurosci 28: 4818-4822.
32. Standing L. 1973. Learning 10,000 pictures. Q J Exp Psychol 25: 207-222.
33. Steckler T, Drinkenburg WH, Sahgal A, Aggleton JP. 1998. Recognition memory in rats-I. Concepts and classification. Prog Neurobiol 54: 289-311. (Pubitemid 28112648)
34. Vago DR, Kesner RP. 2008. Disruption of the direct perforant path input to the CA1 subregion of the dorsal hippocampus interferes with spatial working memory and novelty detection. Behav Brain Res 189: 273-283.
35. van Vugt MK, Schulze-Bonhage A, Litt B, Brandt A, Kahana MJ. 2010. Hippocampal gamma oscillations increase with memory load. J Neurosci 30: 2694-2699.
36. Wan RQ, Pang K, Olton DS. 1994. Hippocampal and amygdaloid involvement in nonspatial and spatial working memory in rats: Effects of delay and interference. Behav Neurosci 108: 866-882. (Pubitemid 24322258)
37. Wible CG, Shiber JR, Olton DS. 1992. Hippocampus, fimbria-fornix, amygdala, and memory: Object discriminations in rats. Behav Neurosci 106: 751-761.
38. Yakovlev V, Amit DJ, Romani S, Hochstein S. 2008. Universal memory mechanism for familiarity recognition and identification. J Neurosci 28: 239-248.
39. Young JW, Sharkey J, Finlayson K. 2009. Progressive impairment in olfactory working memory in a mouse model of Mild Cognitive Impairment. Neurobiol Aging 30: 1430-1443.
40. Zeamer A, Heuer E, Bachevalier J. 2010. Developmental trajectory of object recognition memory in infant rhesus macaques with and without neonatal hippocampal lesions. J Neurosci 30: 9157-9165.
41. Zeamer A, Meunier M, Bachevalier J. 2011. Stimulus similarity and encoding time influence incidental recognition memory in adult monkeys with selective hippocampal lesions. Learn Mem 18: 170-180.