Effects of Selective Neonatal Hippocampal Lesions on Tests of Object and Spatial Recognition Memory in Monkeys

Behavioral Neuroscience

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 137-149

  Heuer, Eric ^a   Bachevalier, Jocelyne ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Delayed nonmatching to sample; Developmental amnesia; Object memory span; Spatial memory span

Indexed keywords

ADULT ANIMAL; ADULTHOOD; AMNESIA; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INFANCY; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; NEONATAL FOCAL HIPPOCAMPUS LESION; NONHUMAN; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; FEMALE; HIPPOCAMPUS; MACACA MULATTA; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 79952160801     PISSN: 07357044     EISSN: 19390084     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0022539     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adlam A.L., Malloy M., Mishkin M., Vargha-Khadem F. Dissociation between recognition and recall in developmental amnesia. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47(11):2207-2210.
2. Alvarado M.C., Bachevalier J. Comparison of the effects of damage to the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex on transverse patterning and location memory in rhesus macaques. Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25(6):1599-1609.
3. Alvarado, M. C., Kazama, A. M., Zeamer, A., & Bachevalier, J. (in press). The effects of selective hippocampal damage on tests of oddity in rhesus macaques. Hippocampus.
4. Bachevalier J., Beauregard M., Alvarado M.C. Long-term effects of neonatal damage to the hippocampal formation and amygdaloid complex on object discrimination and object recognition in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience 1999, 113(6):1127-1151.
5. Bachevalier J., Meunier M. Cerebral ischemia: Are the memory deficits associated with hippocampal cell loss?. Hippocampus 1996, 6(5):553-560.
6. Bachevalier J., Nemanic S. Memory for spatial location and object-place associations are differently processed by the hippocampal formation, parahippocampal areas TH/TF and perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus 2008, 18(1):64-80.
7. Baddeley A., Vargha-Khadem F., Mishkin M. Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for the acquisition of semantic memory?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2001, 13(3):357-369.
8. Banta Lavenex P., Lavenex P. Spatial memory and the monkey hippocampus: Not all space is created equal. Hippocampus 2009, 19(1):8-19.
9. Baxter M.G., Murray E.A. Opposite relationship of hippocampal and rhinal cortex damage to delayed nonmatching-to-sample deficits in monkeys. Hippocampus 2001, 11(1):61-71.
10. Beason-Held L.L., Rosene D.L., Killiany R.J., Moss M.B. Hippocampal formation lesions produce memory impairment in the rhesus monkey. Hippocampus 1999, 9(5):562-574.
11. Blue S.N., Kazama A.M., Bachevalier J. The normal development of object-place association memory is altered by neonatal hippocampal lesions in rhesus monkeys Neuroscience Meeting Planner 2009, Society for Neuroscience Online, Washington DC, 98.7.
12. Brown M.W., Aggleton J.P. Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2001, 2(1):51-61.
13. Buffalo E.A., Ramus S.J., Clark R.E., Teng E., Squire L.R., Zola S.M. Dissociation between the effects of damage to perirhinal cortex and area TE. Learning & Memory 1999, 6(6):572-599.
14. Eichenbaum H., Fortin N., Sauvage M., Robitsek R.J., Farovik A. An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(8):2281-2289.
15. Glavis-Bloom C., Alvarado M.C., Bachevalier J. Neonatal hippocampal damage impairs specific place/food associations in adult macaques. Neuroscience Meeting Planner 2006, Society for Neuroscience Online, Washington DC, 574.11.
16. Goursaud A.P., Bachevalier J. Social attachment in juvenile monkeys with neonatal lesion of the hippocampus, amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Behavioural Brain Research 2007, 176:75-93.
17. Gundersen H.J., Jensen E.B. The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. Journal of Microscopy 1987, 147(Pt 3):229-263.
18. Hampton R.R., Hampstead B.M., Murray E.A. Selective hippocampal damage in rhesus monkeys impairs spatial memory in an open-field test. Hippocampus 2004, 14(7):808-818.
19. Hodos W., Bobko P. A weighted index of bilateral brain lesions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1984, 12(1):43-47.
20. Holdstock J.S., Mayes A.R., Roberts N., Cezayirli E., Isaac C.L., O'Reilly R.C., Norman K.A. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans?. Hippocampus 2002, 12(3):341-351.
21. Kessels R.P., de Haan E.H., Kappelle L.J., Postma A. Varieties of human spatial memory: A meta-analysis on the effects of hippocampal lesions. Brain Research. Brain Research Reviews 2001, 35(3):295-303.
22. King J.A., Trinkler I., Hartley T., Vargha-Khadem F., Burgess N. The hippocampal role in spatial memory and the familiarity-recollection distinction: A case study. Neuropsychology 2004, 18(3):405-417.
23. Lavenex P., Lavenex P.B., Amaral D.G. Spatial relational learning persists following neonatal hippocampal lesions in macaque monkeys. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10(2):234-239.
24. Lavenex P.B., Amaral D.G., Lavenex P. Hippocampal lesion prevents spatial relational learning in adult macaque monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26(17):4546-4558.
25. Malkova L., Bachevalier J., Mishkin M., Saunders R.C. Neurotoxic lesions of perirhinal cortex impair visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys. Neuroreport 2001, 12(9):1913-1917.
26. Mayes A.R., Holdstock J.S., Isaac C.L., Hunkin N.M., Roberts N. Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult-onset damage limited to the hippocampus. Hippocampus 2002, 12(3):325-340.
27. Meunier M., Bachevalier J., Mishkin M., Murray E.A. Effects on visual recognition of combined and separate ablations of the entorhinal and perirhinal cortex in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 1993, 13(12):5418-5432.
28. Mishkin M. Memory in monkeys severely impaired by combined but not by separate removal of amygdala and hippocampus. Nature 1978, 273(5660):297-298.
29. Mumby D.G., Wood E.R., Duva C.A., Kornecook T.J., Pinel J.P., Phillips A.G. Ischemia-induced object-recognition deficits in rats are attenuated by hippocampal ablation before or soon after ischemia. Behavioral Neuroscience 1996, 110(2):266-281.
30. Munoz, M., Chadwick, M., Perez-Hernandez, E., Vargha-Khadem, F., & Mishkin, M. (2010). Novelty preference in patients with developmental amnesia. Hippocampus. [Epub ahead of print].
31. Murray E.A., Mishkin M. Object recognition and location memory in monkeys with excitotoxic lesions of the amygdala and hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience 1998, 18(16):6568-6582.
32. Nemanic S., Alvarado M.C., Bachevalier J. The hippocampal/parahippocampal regions and recognition memory: Insights from visual paired comparison versus object-delayed nonmatching in monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience 2004, 24(8):2013-2026.
33. O'Keefe J., Nadel L. The hippocampus as a cognitive map 1978, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford New York.
34. Pascalis O., Hunkin N.M., Holdstock J.S., Isaac C.L., Mayes A.R. Visual paired comparison performance is impaired in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively intact item recognition. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42(10):1293-1300.
35. Rehbein L., Killiany R., Mahut H. Developmental study of the hippocampal formation in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): I. Early ablations spare discrimination learning but not recognition memory. Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 119(3):635-650.
36. Ringo J.L. Seemingly discrepant data from hippocampectomized macaques are reconciled by detectability analysis. Behavioral Neuroscience 1988, 102(1):173-177.
37. Ringo J.L. Memory decays at the same rate in macaques with and without brain lesions when expressed in d' or arcsine terms. Behavioural Brain Research 1991, 42(2):123-134.
38. Spiers H.J., Burgess N., Hartley T., Vargha-Khadem F., O'Keefe J. Bilateral hippocampal pathology impairs topographical and episodic memory but not visual pattern matching. Hippocampus 2001, 11(6):715-725.
39. Suzuki W.A., Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R., Amaral D.G. Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities. Journal of Neuroscience 1993, 13(6):2430-2451.
40. Van Bonin G., Bailey P. The neocortex of Macaca mulatta 1947, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
41. Wixted J.T., Mickes L., Squire L.R. Measuring recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe. Hippocampus 2010, 20(11):1195-1205.
42. Zeamer, A., Meunier, M., & Bachevalier, J. (in press). Stimulus discriminabliity and encoding time influence incidental recognition memory in adult monkeys with selective hippocampal lesions. Learning & Memory.
43. Zeamer A.E., Heuer E., Bachevalier J. Developmental trajectory of object recognition memory in infant rhesus macaques with and without neonatal hippocampal lesions. Journal of Neuroscience 2010, 30(27):9157-9165.
44. Zola S.M., Squire L.R., Teng E., Stefanacci L., Buffalo E.A., Clark R.E. Impaired recognition memory in monkeys after damage limited to the hippocampal region. Journal of Neuroscience 2000, 20(1):451-463.
45. Zola-Morgan S., Squire L.R. Medial temporal lesions in monkeys impair memory on a variety of tasks sensitive to human amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience 1985, 99(1):22-34.