Relationship between kinetics of albumin-bound bilirubin and watersoluble urea in extracorporeal blood purification

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 1200-1206

  Jung, Aleksandra ^a   Korohoda, Przemysław ^a   Krisper, Peter ^b   Schneditz, Daniel ^b  

^a AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bilirubin kinetics; Distribution volume; Extracorporeal liver support therapy; Treatment dose; Urea kinetics

Indexed keywords

ALBUMIN; BILIRUBIN; BILIRUBIN GLUCURONIDE; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; UREA;

ACUTE LIVER FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILIRUBIN BLOOD LEVEL; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CHRONIC LIVER FAILURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER CLEARANCE; LIVER SUPPORT; MALE; METABOLITE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; SOLUTE; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT DURATION; UREA BLOOD LEVEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALBUMINS; BILIRUBIN; END STAGE LIVER DISEASE; EXTRACORPOREAL CIRCULATION; FEMALE; HEMOFILTRATION; HUMANS; KINETICS; LIVER FAILURE, ACUTE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROGNOSIS; UREA; WATER;

EID: 84861122770     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfr413     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Depner TA. Prescribing Hemodialysis: A Guide to Urea Modeling. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991
2. Gotch FA. The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998; 13: 10-14
3. Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G et al. Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int 2003; 63: 1934-1943
4. Vanholder R, Eloot S, Van Biesen W. What are the potential solutions for the problems with current methods for quantifying hemodialysis? Semin Dial 2008; 21: 407-409
5. Duchesne R, Klein JD, Velotta JB et al. UT-A urea transporter protein in heart: increased abundance during uremia, hypertension, and heart failure. Circ Res 2001; 89: 139-145
6. Wagner L, Klein JD, Sands JM et al. Urea transporters are distributed in endothelial cells and mediate inhibition of L-arginine transport. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2002; 283: F578-F582
7. Eloot S, Torremans A, De Smet R et al. Kinetic behavior of urea is different from that of other water-soluble compounds: the case of the guanidino compounds. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1566-1575
8. Krieter DH, Hackl A, Rodriguez A et al. Protein-bound uraemic toxin removal in haemodialysis and post-dilution haemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 212-218
9. Meert N, Eloot S, Waterloos MA et al. Effective removal of proteinbound uraemic solutes by different convective strategies: a prospective trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 562-570
10. Luo FJG, Patel KP, Marquez IO et al. Effect of increasing dialyzer mass transfer area coefficient and dialysate flow on clearance of protein-bound solutes: a pilot crossover trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 53: 1042-1049
11. Fulop M, Sandson J, Brazeau P. Dialyzability, protein binding, and renal excretion of plasma conjugated bilirubin. J Clin Invest 1965; 44: 666-680
12. Chadha V, Garg U, Warady BA et al. Sieving coefficient inaccuracies during hemodiafiltration in patients with hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatr Nephrol 2000; 15: 33-35
13. Khoury N, Pelle G, Costa MA et al. Lack of bilirubin removal during dialysis without an impact on creatinine clearance. Pediatr Nephrol 2003; 18: 1308-1308
14. Rysz J, Stolarek RA, Pedzik A et al. Serum antioxidant capacity is preserved in peritoneal dialysis contrary to its robust depletion after hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration sessions. Ther Apher Dial 2010; 14: 209-217
15. Rifai K, Ernst T, Kretschmer U et al. The Prometheus device for extracorporeal support of combined liver and renal failure. Blood Purif 2005; 23: 298-302
16. Krisper P, Haditsch B, Stauber R et al. In vivo quantification of liver dialysis: comparison of albumin dialysis and fractionated plasma separation. J Hepatol 2005; 43: 451-457
17. Evenepoel P, Laleman W, Wilmer A et al. Prometheus versus molecular adsorbents recirculating system: comparison of efficiency in two different liver detoxification devices. Artif Organs 2006; 30: 276-284
18. Daugirdas JT, Schneditz D. Postdialysis urea rebound: measurement, prediction, and effects of regional blood flow. Dial Transplant 1994; 23: 166-173
19. Jung A, Krisper P, Haditsch B et al. Bilirubin kinetic modeling for quantification of extracorporeal liver support. Blood Purif 2006; 24: 413-422
20. Stiller S, Xu XQ, Gruner N et al. Validation of a two-pool model for the kinetics of beta2-microglobulin. Int J Artif Organs 2002; 25: 411-420
21. Guyton AC, Taylor AE, Granger HJ. Circulatory Physiology II: Dynamics and Control of the Body Fluids. Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders Company, 1975
22. Gabel JC, Drake RE. Plasma proteins and protein osmotic pressure. In: Edema. New York, NY: Raven Press, 1984:371-381
23. Ellmerer M, Schaupp L, Brunner GA et al. Measurement of interstitial albumin in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue by openflow microperfusion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000; 278: E352-E356
24. Lindley EJ, Chamney PW, Wuepper A et al. A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 211-216
25. Wuepper A, Tattersall J, Kraemer M et al. Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 2262-2271
26. Canaud B, Bosc JY, Cabrol L et al. Urea as a marker of adequacy in hemodialysis: lesson from in vivo urea dynamics monitoring. Kidney Int Suppl 2000; 76: S28-S40
27. Schneditz D, Fariyike B, Osheroff R et al. Is intercompartmental urea clearance during hemodialysis a perfusion term? A comparison of two pool urea kinetic models. J Am Soc Nephrol 1995; 6: 1360-1370
28. George TO, Priester-Coary A, Dunea G et al. Cardiac output and urea kinetics in dialysis patients: evidence supporting the regional blood flow model. Kidney Int 1996; 50: 1273-1277
29. Kanagasundaram NS, Greene T, Larive AB et al. Dosing intermittent haemodialysis in the intensive care unit patient with acute renal failure-estimation of urea removal and evidence for the regional blood flow model. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008; 23: 2286-2298
30. Leypoldt JK, Jaber BL, Lysaght MJ et al. Kinetics and dosing predictions for daily haemofiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 769-776
31. Brummelhuis WJ, van Geest RJ, van Schelven LJ et al. Sodium profiling, but not cool dialysate, increases the absolute plasma refill rate during hemodialysis. ASAIO J 2009; 55: 575-580
32. Schneditz D, Platzer D, Daugirdas JT. A diffusion-adjusted regional blood flow model to predict solute kinetics during haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2009; 24: 2218-2224