A comparison of methods for determining urea distribution volume for routine use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis adequacy

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 211-216

  Lindley, Elizabeth J ^a   Chamney, Paul W ^b   Wuepper, Andreas ^b   Ingles, Helen ^a   Tattersall, James E ^a   Will, Eric J ^a  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Haemodialysis adequacy; On line clearance monitoring; Urea distribution volume; Urea kinetic modelling

Indexed keywords

UREA;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; ONLINE MONITORING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPECTROSCOPY; TREATMENT DURATION; UREA BLOOD LEVEL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY, ARTIFICIAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; ONLINE SYSTEMS; RENAL DIALYSIS; UREA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58049217457     PISSN: 09310509     EISSN: 14602385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfn457     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Polaschegg HD. Automatic, noninvasive intradialytic clearance measurement. Int J Artif Organs 1993; 16: 185-191
2. Gotch FA, Panlilio FM, Buyaki RA et al. Mechanisms determining the ratio of conductivity clearance to urea clearance. Kidney Int 2004; 66(Suppl 89): S3-S24
3. Kuhlmann U, Goldau R, Samadi N et al. Accuracy and safety of online clearance monitoring based on conductivity variation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001; 16: 1053-1058
4. Daugirdas JT. Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: an analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 1993; 4: 1205-1213
5. Daugirdas JT, Greene T, Depner TA et al. Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: effects of age, race, and gender. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 1108-1119
6. Wuepper A, Tattersall J, Kraemer M et al. Determination of urea distribution volume for Kt/V assessed by conductivity monitoring. Kidney Int 2003; 64: 2262-2271
7. Moissl UM, Wabel P, Chamney PW et al. Body fluid volume determination via body composition spectroscopy in health and disease. Physiol Meas 2006; 27: 921-933
8. Depner TA. Prescribing Hemodialysis: A Guide to Urea Modeling. Boston: Kluwer, 1991
9. Di Filippo S, Andrulli D, Manzoni C et al. On-line assessment of delivered dialysis dose. Kidney Int 1998; 54: 263-267
10. Dumler F. Best method for estimating urea volume of distribution: comparison of single pool variable volume kinetic modeling measurements with bioimpedance and anthropometric methods. ASAIO J 2004; 50: 237-241
11. Moret K, Beerenhout CH, Van Den Wall Bake AW et al. Ionic dialysance and the assessment of Kt/V: the influence of different estimates of V on method agreement. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007; 22: 2276-2282
12. Kloppenburg WD, Stegeman CA, Hooyschuur M et al. Assessing dialysis adequacy and dietary intake in the individual hemodialysis patient. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 1961-1969
13. Di Filippo S, Andrulli A, Mangano S et al. Reduction in urea distribution volume over time in clinically stable dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2006; 69: 754-759
14. Daugirdas JT. Simplified equations for monitoring Kt/V, PCRn, eKt/V, and ePCRn. Adv Ren Replace Ther 1995; 2: 295-304
15. Watson PE, Watson ID, Batt RD. Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. Am J Clin Nutr 1980; 33: 27-39