Participation and protected areas governance: The impact of changing influence of local authorities on the conservation of the Białowieża primeval forest, Poland

Ecology and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Niedzialkowski, Krzysztof ^a,b   Paavola, Jouni ^b   Jedrzejewska, Bogumila ^a  

^a MAMMAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bia owie a; Biodiversity conservation; Governance; National park; Participation; Poland; Protected areas

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; NATIONAL PARK; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PROTECTED AREA;

POLAND;

EID: 84860893190     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-04461-170102     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abels, G. 2007. Citizen involvement in public policy-making: does it improve democratic legitimacy and accountability? The case of pTA. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences 13 (1): 103-116.
2. Adamczyk, W. 1994. RezerwatbiosferyPuszczyBiatowieskiej a jego mieszkahcy - Diagnoza wspdtdziatania. Studium socjologiczne. Instytut Badawczy Lesnictwa, Warszawa-Bialystok-Lublin, Poland.
3. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association 35(4):216-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
4. Arts, B., and P. Leroy, editors. 2006. Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/l-4020-5079-8
5. Berkes, F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18(3):621-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.llll/J.1523-1739.2004.00077.X
6. Bickerstaff, K., and G. Walker. 2001. Participatory local governance and transport planning. Environment and Planning A 33(3):431-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a33173
7. Bishop, P., and G. Davis. 2002. Mapping public participation in policy choices. Australian Journal of Public Administration 61(l):14-29. http://dx.doi.Org/10.l111/1467-8500.00255
8. Blackstock, K. L., and C. Richards. 2007. Evaluating stakeholder involvement in river basin planning: a Scottish case study. Water Policy 9(5):493-512. http://dx.doi.Org/10.2166/wp.2007.018
9. Blanco, E., and J. Razzaque. 2008. Ecosystem services and human well-being in a globalized world: assessing the role of law. Human Rights Quarterly 31(3):698-720.
10. Bobiec, A. 1998. Kontrakt dla Puszczy. Biuletyn Informacyjny roPS 2(8):10-13.
11. Bobiec, A., H. van der Burgt, K. Meijer, C. Zuyderduyn, J. Haga, and B. Vlaanderen. 2000. Rich deciduous forests in Bialowieza as a dynamic mosaic of developmental phases: premises for nature conservation and restoration management. Forest Ecology and Management 130(1-3): 159-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127f99W)181-4
12. Brechin, S. R., P. R. Wilshusen, C. L. Fortwangler, and P. C. West. 2002. Beyond the square wheel: toward a more comprehensive understanding of biodiversity conservation as social and political process. Society and Natural Resources 15 (l):41-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419202317174011
13. Carmin, J. 2003. Resources, opportunities and local environmental action in the democratic transition and early consolidation periods in the Czech Republic. Environmental Politics 12(3):42-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308274
14. Chopra, K., R. Leemans, P. Kumar, and H. Simons, editors. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: policy responses. Volume 3. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
15. Connely, S. 2006. Looking inside public involvement: how is it made so ineffective and can we change this? Community Development Journal 41(1): 13-24. http://dx.doi.Org/l0.1093/cdj/bsi046
16. Czajkowski, M., M. Buszko-Briggs, and N. Hanley. 2009. Valuing changes in forest biodiversity. Ecological Economics 68(12):2910-2917. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.016
17. DGLP. 1997. Las w liczbach. Dyrekcja Generalna Lasow Panstwowych, Warsaw, Poland.
18. Dressier, W., B. Biischer, M. Schoon, D. Brockington, T. Hayes, C. A. Kull, J. McCarthy, and K. Shrestha. 2010. From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental Conservation 37(1):5-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000044
19. Dubbink, W. 2008. Vindicating arrogant ecologists. Pages 47-53 in J. Keulartz and G. Leistra, editors. Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: case studies in multilevel governance. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-l-4020-6510-l_3
20. Falinski, J. B. 1992. BiatowieskiParkNarodowy (1921-1991) - proba 70 lat. Chrohmy Przyrode Ojczystq 48(3):5-15.
21. Fernandez, S. A. 2008. Legitimacy problems in Spanish nature policy. Pages 83-100 in J. Keulartz and G. Leistra, editors. Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: case studies in multilevel governance. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1007/978-1-4020-6510-1_6
22. Fiorino, D. J. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values 15(2):226-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500204
23. Gauvin, F.-P., and J. Abelson, 2006 Primer on public involvement. Health Council of Canada, [online] URL: http://www.healthcouncilcanada.ca/docs/papers/2006/PublicInvolvementPrimer_EN.pdf
24. Graniczny, S. 1957. Blaski i cienie naszej gospodarki w Puszczy Bialowieskiej. Las Polski 5-6.
25. Graniczny, S. 1979. Zmiany zasad zagospodarowania lasow Puszczy Bialowieskiej w latach 1929-1976. Sylwan 11:27-37.
26. Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., and J. Cent. 2011. Expansion of nature conservation areas: problems with Natura 2000 implementation in Poland? Environmental Management 47 (1): 11-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9583-2
27. Habermas, J. 1987. The philosophical discourse of modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
28. Hovik, S., C. Sandstrom, and A. Zachrisson. 2010. Management of protected areas in Norway and Sweden: challenges in combining central governance and local participation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 12(2): 159-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15239081003719219
29. Irwin, F., and J. Ranganathan. 2007 Restoring nature's capital: an action agenda to sustain ecosystem services. World Resources Institute, [online] URL: http://pdf.wri.org/restoring_natures_capital.pdf
30. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 2003 Recommendations, Vth IUCN World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa, 8 17 September 2003. IUCN. [online] URL: http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/recommendationen.pdf
31. Jedrzejewska, B., H. Okarma, W. Jedrzejewski, and L. Minkowski. 1994. Effects of exploitation and protection on forest structure, ungulate density and wolf predation in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. Journal of Applied Ecology 31(4):664-676. http://dx.doi.org/!0.2307/2404157
32. Jedrzejewski, W., and B. Jedrzejewska. 1995. Projekt utworzenia Parku Narodowego Puszczy Bialowieskiej. Chrohmy Przyrode Ojczystq 51(3): 16-35.
33. Kellert, S. R., J. N. Mehta, S. A. Ebbin, and L. L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources: an International Journal 13(8):705-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419200750035575
34. Kitchin, R., and N. J. Tate. 2000. Conducting research into human geography. Prentice-Hall, Harlow, UK.
35. Kluvankova-Oravska, T., V. Chobotova, I. Banaszak, L. Slavikova, and S. Trifunovova. 2009. From government to governance for biodiversity: the perspective of Central and Eastern European transition countries. Environmental Policy and Governance 19(3):186-196. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1002/eet.508
36. Kossak, S. 2001. Saga Puszczy Bialowieskiej. Muza S.A., Warsaw, Poland.
37. Krolikowska, K 2007. Konflikty spoleczne w polskich parkach narodowych. Impuls, Krakow, Poland.
38. Lawrence, A. 2008. Experiences with participatory conservation in post-socialist Europe. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 4:179-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.3843/Biodiv.4.4:l
39. Leibnath, M. 2008. Legitimacy of biodiversity policies in a multi-level setting. Pages 233-250 in J. Keulartz and G. Leistra, editors. Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: case studies in multilevel governance. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/l0.1007/978-1-4020-6510-l_18
40. Locke, H, and P. Dearden. 2005. Rethinking protected area categories and the new paradigm. Environmental Conservation 32(01): 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892905001852
41. Lockwood, M., G. Worboys, and A. Kothari.2006. Managing protected areas: a global guide. Earthscan, London, UK.
42. Mose, I., and N. Weixlbaumer. 2007. A new paradigm for protected areas in Europe? Pages 3-20 in I. Mose and N. Weixlbaumer, editors. Protected areas and regional development in Europe: Towards a new model for the 21st century. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
43. MOSZNiL. 1998. Kontrakt dla Puszczy Biatowieskiej. Dziatania na rzeczpowiekszenia parku narodowego w obrebie polskiej czesci Puszczy Biatowieskiej. Ministerstwo Ochrony Srodowiska, Zasobow Naturalnych i Lesnictwa, Warsaw, Poland.
44. Okolow, Cz., K. 2009. Historia ochrony. Pages 10-16 in Cz. K Okolow and A. Bolbot, editors. Bialowieski Park Narodowy: Poznac, zrozumiec, zachowac. Bialowieski Park Narodowy, Bialowieza, Poland.
45. Paavola, J. 2004. Protected areas governance and justice: theory and the European Union's habitats directive. Environmental Sciences l(l):59-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/evms.1.1.59.23763
46. Phillips, A. 2003. Turning ideas on their head: the new paradigm for protected areas. George Wright Forum 20:8-32.
47. Pretty, J. N., and M. P. Pimbert. 1995. Beyond conservation ideology and the wilderness. Natural Resources Forum 19 (1):5-14. http://dx.doi.Org/10.llll/j.1477-8947.1995.tb00588.x
48. Rada Naukowa Biafowieskiego Parku Narodowego. 2000. Zasady funkcjonowania Biatowieskiego Parku Narodowego powiekszonego na cafy obszar polskiej czesci Puszczy Biatowieskiej. Bialowieski Park Narodowy, Bialowieza, Poland.
49. Rauschmayer, F., S. van den Hove, and T. Koetz. 2009. Participation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric? Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 27:42-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c0703j
50. Renn, O. 2006. Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy 23:34-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.005
51. Sejm, 2000 Minutes of the Parliamentary Sitting of 14.09.2000. Sejm Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej. [online] URL= http://orka2.sejm.gov.pl/Debata3.nsf.
52. Shand, D., and M. Arnberg. 1996. Background paper. Pages 15-38 in Responsive government: service quality initiatives. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Paris, France.
53. Sokotowski, A. W. 1983. Koniecznosc zwidcszenia powierzchni Bialowieskiego Parku Narodowego. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody 4(2):29-37.
54. Sokolowski, A. W. 1986. Kompromis w zakresie ochrony przyrody Puszczy Biatowieskiej. Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody 1(7):17-20.
55. Stirling, A. 2006. Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. Land Use Policy 23(1):95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.010
56. Stirling, A. 2008. Opening up and closing down. Science, Technology and Human Values 33(2):262-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265
57. Terborgh, J. 2004. Reflections of a scientist on the World Parks Congress. Conservation Biology 18(3):619-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.l523-1739.2004.01837.x
58. Thomas, J. C. 1993. Public involvement and governmental effectiveness: a decision-making model for public managers. Administrative Science and Society 24(4):444-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/009539979302400402
59. Tickle, A., and R. Clarke. 2000. Nature and landscape conservation in transition in central and south-eastern Europe. European Environment 10(5):211-219.
60. Tickle, A., and I. Welsh, editors. 1998. Environment and society in Eastern Europe. Longman, New York, New York, USA.
61. UNESCO. 2010. About MAB.[online] URL: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/environment/ecological-sciences/man-and-biosphere-programme/about-mab/.
62. van den Belt, H. 2008. The local implementation of nature policy. Pages 227-231 in J. Keulartz and G. Leistra, editors. Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: case studies in multilevel governance. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
63. Wells, M., and T. O. McShane. 2004. Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio 33 (8):513-519.
64. Wesotowski, T. 2005. Virtual conservation: how the European Union is turning a blind eye to its vanishing primeval forests. Conservation Biology 19(5): 1349-1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/J.1523-1739.2005.00265.X
65. Wesselink, A., J. Paavola, O. Renn, and O. Fritsch. 2011. Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance. A practitioners' perspective. Environment and Planning A 43(11) 2688-2704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a44161
66. White, R., A. Fischer, H. P. Hansen, R. Varjopuro, J. Young, and M. Adamescu. 2005. Conflict management, participation, social learning and attitutes in biodiversity conservation. AlterNet. [online] URL: http://www.alter-net.mfo/SITE/UPLOAD/DOCUMENT/outputs%5CANet_WPR4_2005_03_Confl_Part_SL_Attitudes2.pdf
67. Wiecko, E. 1984. Puszcza Biatowieska. Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, Poland.
68. Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research. Design and methods. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California, USA. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1177/107554708100300106
69. Zwart, H. 2008. Animal governance: the cormorant case. Pages 75-81 in J. Keulartz and G. Leistra, editors. Legitimacy in European nature conservation policy: case studies in multilevel governance. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-l-4020-6510-l_5