Rethinking community-based conservation

Conservation Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 621-630

  Berkes, Fikret ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Comanagement; Common property; Community based conservation; Participation; Scale; Social ecological systems; Traditional ecological knowledge

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION PLANNING; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARADIGM SHIFT;

EID: 2542474346     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Agrawal, A., and C. C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27:629-649.
2. Alcorn, J. B. 1993. Indigenous peoples and conservation. Conservation Biology 7:424-426.
3. Barrett, C. B., K. Brandon, C. Gibson, and H. Gjertsen. 2001. Conserving tropical biodiversity amid weak institutions. BioScience 51:497-502.
4. Becker, D. 1999. Protecting a garua forest in Ecuador: the role of institutions and ecosystem valuation. Ambio 28:156-161.
5. Becker, D., and E. Ostrom. 1995. Human ecology and resource sustainability: the importance of institutional diversity. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 26:113-133.
6. Berkes, F. 1999. Sacred ecology: traditional ecological knowledge and resource management. Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia.
7. Berkes, F. 2002. Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. Pages 293-321 in E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. U. Weber, editors. The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
8. Berkes, F., and C. Folke, editors. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
9. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2000. Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications 10:1251-1262.
10. Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke, editors. 2003. Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
11. Blann, K., S. Light, and J. A. Musumeci. 2003. Facing the adaptive challenge: practitioners' insights from negotiating resource crises in Minnesota. Pages 210-240 in F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, editors. Navigating the dynamics of social-ecological systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
12. Bradshaw, G. A., and M. Bekoff. 2001. Ecology and social responsibility: the re-embodiment of science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:460-465.
13. Brosius, J. P., A. Tsing, and C. Zerner. 1998. Representing communities: histories and politics of community-based resource management. Society & Natural Resources 11:157-168.
14. Brosius, J. P., and D. Russell. 2003. Conservation from above: an anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 17(1/2):39-65.
15. Brown, K. 2002. Innovations for conservation and development. The Geographical Journal 168:6-17.
16. Carlsson, L. 2000. Policy networks as collective action. Policy Studies Journal 28:502-520.
17. Cash, D. W., and S. C. Moser. 2000. Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change 10:109-120.
18. Chambers, R. 1983. Rural development: putting the last first. Longman, London, United Kingdom.
19. Equator Initiative. 2002. United Nations Development Programme Equator Initiative, Longman, London. Available from http://www. undp.org/ equatorinitiative/ (accessed August 2003).
20. Folke, C., et al. 2002. Resilience for sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Rainbow series 3. International Council for Scientific Unions (ICSU), Paris. Available from http://www.sou.gov.se/mvb/pdf/resiliens.pdf (accessed August 2003).
21. Ford, J., and D. Martinez, editors. 2000. Invited feature: traditional ecological knowledge, ecosystem science and environmental management. Ecological Applications 10:1249-1340.
22. Gadgil, M., P. R. Seshagiri Rao, G. Utkarsh, P. Pramod, and A. Chhatre. 2000. New meanings for old knowledge: the People's Biodiversity Registers programme. Ecological Applications 10:1251-1262.
23. Ghimire, K. B., and M. P. Pimbert, editors. 1997. Social change and conservation. Earthscan, London.
24. Gibson, C. C. 1999. Politicians and poachers: the political economy of wildlife policy in Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
25. Gunderson, L. H., and C. S. Holling, editors. 2002. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
26. Haas, P. M. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean: The politics of international environmental cooperation. Columbia University Press, New York.
27. Hackel, J. D. 1999. Community conservation and the future of Africa's wildlife. Conservation Biology 13:726-734.
28. Hoare, R. E., and J. T. du Toit. 1999. Coexistence between people and elephants in African savannas. Conservation Biology 13:633-639.
29. Holling C. S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390-405.
30. Holling, C. S., and G. K. Meffe. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology 10:328-337.
31. Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, London.
32. Kates, R. W., et al. 2001. Sustainability science. Science 292:641-642.
33. Kellert, S. R., J. N. Mehta, S. A. Ebbin, and L. L. Lichenfeld. 2000. Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric and reality. Society & Natural Resources 13:705-715.
34. Levin, S. A. 1999. Fragile dominion: complexity and the commons. Perseus, New York.
35. Ludwig, D. 2001. The era of management is over. Ecosystems 4:758-764.
36. Murphree, M. W. 2002. Protected areas and the commons. Common Property Resource Digest 60:1-3.
37. Olsson, P., and C. Folke. 2001. Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: a study of Lake Racken watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4:85-104.
38. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
39. Ostrom, E., J. Burger, C. B. Field, R. B. Norgaard, and D. Policansky. 1999. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284:278-282.
40. Ostrom, E., T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. U. Weber, editors. 2002. The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
41. Ramakrishnan, P. S., K. G. Saxena, and U. M. Chandrashekara, editors. 1998. Conserving the sacred for biodiversity management. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi.
42. Redford, K. H., and S. E. Sanderson. 2000. Extracting humans from nature. Conservation Biology 14:1362-1364.
43. Redford, K. H., and A. M. Stearman. 1993. Forest-dwelling native Amazonians and the conservation of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 7:248-255.
44. Roberts, M., W. Norman, N. Minhinnick, D. Wihongi, and C. Kirkwood. 1995. Kaitiakitanga: Maori perspectives on conservation. Pacific Conservation Biology 2:7-20.
45. Ruitenbeek, J., and C. Cartier. 2001. The invisible wand: adaptive comanagement as an emergent strategy in complex bio-economic systems. Occasional paper 34. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia. Available from http://www.cifor.cgiar.org (accessed August 2003).
46. Songorwa, A. N. 1999. Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: are the communities interested? World Development 27:2061-2079.
47. Young, O. 2002. The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.