The influence of environmental factors on the adhesion of combinations of probiotics to rice fibre fractions

World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 2293-2302

  Fernando, Warnakulasuriya M A D B ^a   Flint, Steve ^a   Brennan, Charles S ^b   Ranaweera, Kamburawala K D S ^c   Bamunuarachchi, Arthur ^c  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^b LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SRI JAYEWARDENEPURA   (Sri Lanka)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Co cultures; Dietary fibre; Environmental factors

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL CELLS; BIFIDOBACTERIUM; CO-CULTURES; COCULTURE; DIETARY FIBRE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; FIBRE FRACTIONS; LACTOBACILLUS SPECIES; PH VALUE; PROBIOTICS; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SOLUBLE DIETARY FIBRE; SYNERGISTIC ACTIVITY; TWEEN 80;

FIBERS; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ADHESION;

DISACCHARIDE; POLYSACCHARIDE; POLYSORBATE; PROBIOTIC AGENT; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIFIDOBACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; DIETARY FIBER; DRUG EFFECT; LACTOBACILLUS; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; RICE;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIFIDOBACTERIUM; DIETARY FIBER; DISACCHARIDES; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LACTOBACILLUS; ORYZA SATIVA; POLYSACCHARIDES; POLYSORBATES; PROBIOTICS; SODIUM CHLORIDE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BIFIDOBACTERIUM; LACTOBACILLUS;

EID: 84860866690     PISSN: 09593993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11274-012-1035-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. AOAC Official Method 985. 29 (1995) Total dietary fibre in foods-enzymatic-gravimetric method. In: Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. AOAC International, Arlington.
2. Bautista-Gallego J, Arroyo-Lopez FN, Dura N-Quitana MC, Garrido-Fernandez A (2008) Individual effects of sodium, potassium, calcium, and magnesium chloride salts on Lactobacillus pentosus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Growth. J Food Prot 71(7): 1412-1421.
3. Betoret N, Puente L, Díaz MJ, Pagán MJ, García MJ, Gras ML, Martínez-Monzó J, Fito P (2003) Development of probiotic-enriched dried fruits by vacuum impregnation. J Food Eng 56(2-3): 273-277.
4. Bhat S, Wallace RJ, Orskov ER (1990) Adhesion of cellulolytic ruminal bacteria to barley straw. Appl Environ Microb 56: 2698-2703.
5. Briczinski EP, Phillips AT, Roberts RF (2008) Transport of glucose by Bifidobacteriumanimalis subsp lactis occurs via facilitated diffusion. Appl Environ Microb 74(22): 6941-6948.
6. Conway PL (1996) Selection criteria for probiotic microorganisms. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 5: 10-14.
7. Crittenden R, Laitila A, Forssell P, Matto J, Saarela M, Mattila-Sandholm T, Myllarinen P (2001) Adhesion of bifidobacteria to granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies. Appl Environ Microb 67: 3469-3475.
8. Gaudet G, Gaillard B (1987) Vesicle formation and cellulose degradation in Bacteroides succinogenes cultures: ultra structural aspects. Arch Microbiol 148: 150-154.
9. Geis A, Singh J, Teuber M (1983) Potential of lactic streptococci to produce bacteriocin. Appl Environ Microb 45(1): 205-211.
10. Greene JD, Klaenhammer TR (1994) Factors involved in adherence of Lactobacilli to human Caco-2 cells. Appl Environ Microb 60: 4487-4494.
11. Imam SH, Harry-O'Kuru RE (1991) Adhesion of Lactobacillus amylovorus to insoluble and derivatized cornstarch granules. Appl Environ Microb 57(4): 1128-1133.
12. Imam SH, Bard RF, Tosteson TR (1984) Specificity of marine microbial surface interactions. Appl Environ Microb 48: 833-839.
13. Lavermicocca P, Valerio F, Lonigro LS, AngelisDe M, Morelli L, Callegari LM, Rizzello GC, Visconti A (2005) Study of adhesion and survival of Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria on table olives with the aim of formulating a new probiotic food. Appl Environ Microb 71(8): 4233-4240.
14. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, vanZyl WH, Pretorius IS (2002) Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Boil R 66: 506-577.
15. Miron J, Ben-Ghedalla D, Morrison M (2001) Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria. J Dairy Sci 84: 1294-1309.
16. Morris EJ, Cole OJ (1987) Relationship between cellulolytic activity and adhesion to cellulose in Ruminococcusalbus. J Gen Microbiol 133: 1023-1032.
17. Mosoni P, Fonty G, Gouet P (1997) Competition between ruminal cellulolytic bacteria for adhesion to cellulose. Curr Microbiol 35: 44-47.
18. Odenyo AA, Mackie RI, Stahl DA, White BA (1994) The use of 16 s ribosomal-rna-targeted oligonucleotide probes to study competition between Ruminal Fibrolytic bacteria-development of probes for Ruminococcus Species and evidence for bacteriocin production. Appl Environ Microb 60: 3688-3696.
19. Pettipher GL, Latham MJ (1979) Characteristics of enzymes produced by Ruminococcus-Flavefaciens which degrade plant-cell walls. J Gen Microbiol 110: 21-27.
20. Roger V, Fonty G, Komisarczukbony S, Gouet P (1990) Effects of physicochemical factors on the adhesion to cellulose avicel of the ruminal bacteria Ruminococcus-Flavefaciens and Fibrobacter-Succinogenes Sub sp Succinogenes. Appl Environ Microb 56: 3081-3087.
21. Sleator RD, Hill C (2007) Food reformulation for improved health: a potential risk for food safety? Med Hypotheses 69: 1323-1324.
22. von Roper H, Koch H (1988) New carbohydrate derivatives from biotechnical and chemical processes. Starch 40: 453-464.
23. Yoshimoto M, Yamakawa O, Tanoue H (2005) Potential chemopreventive properties and varietal difference of dietary fibre from sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) root. Jarq 39: 37-43.