Development and evaluation of Web-based animated pedagogical agents jot facilitating critical thinking in nursing

Nursing Education Perspectives

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 116-120

  Morey, Diane J ^a  

^a California Consortium for Engineering Advances in Technological Education   (United States)

Author keywords

Animated pedagogical agents; Case study; Critical thinking; Think aloud

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TEACHING; THINKING; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AUDIOVISUAL AIDS; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, NURSING, ASSOCIATE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; THINKING; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84860864413     PISSN: 15365026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5480/1536-5026-33.2.116     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adams, M. H., Whitlow, J. R., Stover, L. M., & Johnson, K. W. (1996). Critical thinking as an educational outcome: An evaluation of current tools of measurement. Nurse Educator, 21(3), 23-32. doi: 10.1097%2F00006223-199605000- 00009
2. Alfaro-Lefevre, R. (2008). Critical thinking and clinical judgment A practical approach to outcomefocused thinking. Philadelphia: Saunders.
3. Allen, G. D., Rubenfeld, M. G., & Scheffer, B. K. (2004). Reliability of assessment of critical thinking. Journal of Professional Nursing, 20(1), 15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.004 (Pubitemid 38425825)
4. Anderson, N., Booth, L., Catalano. J., Gaines, L., Horner, M., McCormick, S., et al. (2000). Critical thinking process test Deve/opment and technical eport Stillwell, KS: Educational Resource, Inc.
5. Baylor. A. L., Kim. Y., Son, C., & Lee, M. (2005, July). Designing effective nonverbal communication for pedagogical agents. Proceedings of AI-ED (Artificial Intelligence in Education), Amsterdam.
6. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
7. Bickmore. T. (2010). Relational agents for chronic disease self-management. In B. Hayes & W. Aspray (Eds.), Health informatics: A patient-entered approach in diabetes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Bickmore, T., Pfeifer, L, & Jack, B. (2009). Taking the time to care: Empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), Boston, MA.
9. Craig, S. D., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. M. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428-434. doi: 10.1037%2F0022-0663.94.2.428
10. Daly, W. M. (2001). The development of an alternative method in the assessment of critical thinking as an outcome of nursing education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 36(1), 120-130. doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-2648.2001.01949.x (Pubitemid 33609476)
11. Ericsson, K. A. (2002). Protocol analysis and verbal reports on thinking. Retrieved January 16, 2007 from www.psy.fsu.edu/faculty/ericsson/ericsson. proto.thnk.html
12. Gagne, R. (1985). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
13. Graesser. A. C., Olney. A., Haynes, B. C., & Chipman, P. (2005). AutoTutor: A cognitive system that simulates a tutor that facilitates learning through mixed-initiative dialogue. In C. Forsythe, M. L Bernard, & T. E. Goldsmith (Eds.), Cognitive systems: Human cognitive models in systems design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Hospers, M. A., Kroezen, E., Nijholt, A., Akker, H. J. A., & Heylen, D. K. J. (2003). An agent-based intelligent tutoring system for nurse education. In J. Nealon & A. Moreno (Eds.), Applications of intelligent agents in health care (pp. 141-157). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser.
15. Johnson, W. L., Rickel, J. W., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Animated pedagogical agents: Face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 47-78.
16. Kuiper, R. (2002). Enhancing metacognition through the reflective use of self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 33(2), 78-87.
17. Lester, J., Converse, S. A., Stone, B. A., Kahler, S. E., & Barlow, T (1999). Animated pedagogical agents and problem-solving effectiveness: A large-scale empirical evaluation. In Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 23-30). Amsterdam: IOS Press. Retrieved from http://research.csc.ncsu.edu/ intellimedia/papers/dap-aied-97.pdf
18. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Principles of multimedia learning based on social cues: Personalization, voice, and image principles. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 201-214). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Moreno, R. (2005). Multimedia learning with animated pedagogical agents. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 507-523). New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Moreno, R., Mayer, R. E., & Lester, J. C. (2000). Life-like pedagogical agents in constructivist multimedia environments: Cognitive consequences of their interaction. In ED-MEDIA 2000 Proceedings (pp. 741-746). Charlottesville, VA:AACE Press.
21. Moreno, R., Mayer, R., Spires, H., & Lester, J. (2001). The case for social agency in computerbased teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cognition & Instruction, 19(2), 177-213. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI (902-02 (Pubitemid 33595878)
22. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Paul, R. W., Martin, D, & Adamson, K. (2004). The role of Socratic questioning in thinking, teaching, & learning. Retrieved from www.criticalthinking.org/resources/articles/the-role-socratic-questioning-ttl. shtml
24. Rubenfeld, G., & Scheffer, B. (2010). Critical thinking tactics for nurses: Achieving the 10M competencies. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett
25. Staib, S. (2003). Teaching and measuring critical thinking. Journal of Nursing Education, 42(11), 498-508. (Pubitemid 40063992)
26. Taylor, L, & Dionne. J. (2000). Accessing problemsolving strategy knowledge: The complementary use of concurrent verbal protocols and retrospective debriefing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 413-425. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.413
27. Thompson, C., & Stapley, S. (2011). Do educational interventions improve nurses' clinical decision making and judgement? A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 48(7), 881-893. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.12.005
28. Veletsianos, G. (2007). Cognitive and affective benefits of an animated pedagogical agent: Considering the contextual relevance and aesthetics. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 373-377. doi: 10.2190%2FT543-742X- 033L-9877
29. Worrell J., & Profetto-McGrath, J. (2007). Critical thinking as an outcome of context-based learning among post RN students: A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 27(5), 420-426. doi: 10.10I6/j.nedt2006.07.004