Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy

Anaesthesia

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 626-631

  Russell, T ^a   Khan, S ^a   Elman, J ^a   Katznelson, R ^a   Cooper, R M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; FORCE; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPY; LIFTING EFFORT; MALE; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; STRESS; TONGUE;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OROPHARYNX; PRESSURE; TONGUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84860839463     PISSN: 00032409     EISSN: 13652044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07087.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ,. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1987; 59: 295-9.
2. Akbar AN, Muzi M, Lopatka CW, Ebert TJ,. Neurocirculatory responses to intubation with either an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway in humans. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1996; 8: 194-7.
3. Hassan HG, el-Sharkawy TY, Renck H, Mansour G, Fouda A,. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs. without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1991; 35: 442-7.
4. Sawin P, Todd M, Traynelis V, et al., Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study of subjects without cervical abnormality. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 26-36.
5. LeGrand S, Hindman B, Dexter F, Weeks J, Todd M,. Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study. Anesthesiology 2007; 107: 884-91.
6. Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD,. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977; 47: 524-5.
7. Kovac AL,. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 1996; 8: 63-79.
8. Waddington MS, Paech MJ, Kurowski IHS, et al., The influence of gender and experience on intubation ability and technique: a manikin study. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2009; 37: 791-801.
9. Bishop MJ, Harrington RM, Tencer AF,. Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1992; 74: 411-4.
10. Bucx M, Van Geel R, Scheck P, Stijnen T, Erdmann W,. Forces applied during laryngoscopy and their relationship with patient characteristics. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 601-3.
11. Hasting R, Hon E, Nghiem C, Wahrenbrook E,. Force and torque between laryngoscopists and laryngoscope blades. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996; 82: 462-8.
12. Santoni B, Hindman B, Puttlilz C, et al., Manual in-line stabilization increases pressures applied by the laryngoscope blade during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 24-31.
13. Russell T, Lee C, Firat M, Cooper R,. A comparison of the forces applied to a manikin during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 2011; 39: 1098-102.
14. Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2003; 98: 1269-77.
15. Samsoon GL, Young JR,. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487-90.
16. Khan ZH, Kashfi A, Ebrahimkhani E,. A comparison of the upper lip bite test (a simple new technique) with modified Mallampati classification in predicting difficulty in endotracheal intubation: a prospective blinded study. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 96: 595-9.
17. Cohen J,. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
18. Siddiqui N, Katznelson R, Friedman Z,. Heart rate/blood pressure response and airway morbidity following tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy, GlideScope and Trachlight: a randomized control trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2009; 26: 470-5.
19. Bucx MJ, van Geel RT, Scheck PA, Stijnen T,. Cardiovascular effects of forces applied during laryngoscopy. The importance of tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 1029-33.
20. Hastings RH, Hon ED, Nghiem C, Wahrenbrock EA,. Force, torque, and stress relaxation with direct laryngoscopy. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1996; 82: 456-61.
21. McCoy EP, Austin BA, Mirakhur RK, Wong KC,. A new device for measuring and recording the forces applied during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 139-43.
22. Evans A, Vaughan RS, Hall JE, Mecklenburgh J, Wilkes AR,. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 869-73.
23. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, et al., Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2006; 23: 522-6.
24. Malik MA, Subramaniam R, Maharaj CH, Harte BH, Laffey JG,. Randomized controlled trial of the Pentax AWS®, Glidescope®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes in predicted difficult intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2009; 103: 761-8.
25. Mahjoubifar M, Borjian BS,. Hemodynamic changes during orotracheal intubation with the Glidescope and direct laryngoscope. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal 2010; 12: 406-8.
26. Hirabayashi Y, Hiruta M, Kawakami T, et al., Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. British Journal of Anaesthesia 1998; 81: 253-5.
27. Kitamura T, Yamada Y, Chinzei M, Du HL, Hanaoka K,. Attenuation of haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation by the styletscope. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2001; 86: 275-7.
28. Takahashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M, Toyooka H,. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device Trachlight® in adults with normal airway. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2002; 95: 480-4.
29. Kihara S, Brimacombe J, Yaguchi Y, Watanabe S, Taguchi N, Komatsuzaki T,. Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 96: 890-5.
30. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, et al., Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope(R) videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2007; 19: 245-50.
31. Tsai PB, Chen B-J,. Hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation comparing the Airway Scope®, GlideScope and Macintosh Laryngoscopes. The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology 2010; 24: 2. (accessed 14/01/2012).
32. Sun Y, Liu J-X, Zhu Y-S, Xu H, Huang Y, Jiang H,. Nasotracheal intubation using the blind intubation device in anaesthetised adults with Mallampati class 3: a comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 2011; 28: 774-80.
33. Thomson IR,. The haemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia 1989; 36: 367-9.
34. Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM,. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2011; 57: 240-7.