Comparison of haemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope® videolaryngoscope and fibreoptic bronchoscope

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 522-526

  Xue, F S ^a   Zhang, G H ^a   Li, X Y ^a   Sun, H T ^a   Li, P ^a   Sun, H Y ^a   Xu, Y C ^a   Liu, Y ^a  

^a PLASTIC SURGERY HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia general; Cardiovascular physiology; Haemodynamic phenomena, blood pressure, heart rate; Intubation, intratracheal, fibreoptic bronchoscope, video laryngoscope

Indexed keywords

INTRAVENOUS ANESTHETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BRONCHOSCOPE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PLASTIC SURGERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRONCHOSCOPES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FIBER OPTIC TECHNOLOGY; FIBER OPTICS; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGERY, PLASTIC; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE; TIME FACTORS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 33646514660     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021506000299     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cooper RM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50: 611-613.
2. Agro F, Barzoi G, Montecchia F. Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope® in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 705-706.
3. Doyle DJ. Awake intubation using the GlideScope® video laryngoscope: initial experience in four cases. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 642-643.
4. Lim Y, Lim TJ, Liu EH. Ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by inexperienced operators in simulated difficult airways. Can J Anaesth 2004; 51: 641-642.
5. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope®) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 191-198.
6. GlideScope®. Operator and Service Manual. Saturn Biomedical Systems Inc., 2003.
7. Xue FS, Li XY, Zhang GH, Li CW, Sun HT. A comparative study of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with GlideScope videolaryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope. Forum Anesth Monit (Chinese) 2005; 12: 168-171.
8. Finfer SR, MacKenzie SIP, Saddler JM, Watkins TGL. Haemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation: a comparison of direct laryngoscopy and fiberoptic intubation. Anesth Intens Care 1989; 17: 44-48.
9. Sun HY, Xue FS, Li P, Li CW, Sun HT. A comparative study of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with fibreoptic bronchoscope and direct laryngoscope. Forum Anesth Monit (Chinese) 2003; 10: 262-265.
10. Schaefer HG, Marsch SC, Strebel SP, Drewe J. Cardiovascular effects of fibreoptic oral intubation. A comparison of a total intravenous and a balanced volatile technique. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 1034-1036.
11. Schaefer HG, Marsch SC. Comparison of orthodox with fibreoptic orotracheal intubation under total i.v. anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1991; 66: 608-610.
12. Adachi YU, Takamatsu I, Watanabe K, Uchihashi Y, Higuchi H, Satoh T. Evaluation of the haemodynamic responses to fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with television monitoring: comparison with conventional direct laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 503-508.
13. Barak M, Ziser A, Greenberg A, Lischinsky S, Rosenberg B. Hemodynamic and catecholamine response to tracheal intubation: direct laryngoscopy compared with fiberoptic intubation. J Clin Anesth 2003; 15: 132-136.
14. Li P, He N, Xue FS. The adverse physiologic responses to intubation and its prevention. In: Xue FS, ed. Modern Airway Management - Critical Procedure for Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Zhengzhou, China: Zhengzhou University Publishing House, 2002: 1020-1030.
15. Bishop MJ, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 411-414.
16. Bucx MJ, Scheck PA, Van Geel RT, Den Ouden AH, Niesing R. Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 348-351.
17. Bucx MJ, van Geel RT, Scheck PA, Stijnen T. Cardiovascular effects of forces applied during laryngoscopy. The importance of tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 1029-1033.
18. Benumof JL. Conventional (laryngoscopic) orotracheal and nasotracheal intubation (single-lumen type). In: Benumof JL, ed. Clinical Procedures in Anesthesia and Intensive Care. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1992: 131.
19. Takahashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M, Toyooka H. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (Trachlight) in adults with normal airway. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 480-484.
20. Hirabayashi Y, Hiruta M, Kawakami T et al. Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81: 253-255.