Heart rate/blood pressure response and airway morbidity following tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy, GlideScope and Trachlight: A randomized control trial

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 26, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 740-745

  Siddiqui, Naveed ^a   Katznelson, Rita ^a   Friedman, Zeev ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Cardiovascular physiological phenomena; Glidescope; Heart rate; Intratracheal; Intubation; Trachlight anaesthesia general

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; MIDAZOLAM; PROPOFOL; ROCURONIUM;

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; SORE THROAT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; ADOLESCENT; AGED; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; INSTRUMENTATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHARYNGITIS; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HOARSENESS; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHARYNGITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74049155982     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832b138d     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Forbes AM, Dally FG. Acute hypertension during induction of anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation in normotensive men. Br J Anaesth 1970; 42:618-624.
2. Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, et al. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977; 47:524-525.
3. Thomson IR. The haemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36:367-369.
4. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:295-299. (Pubitemid 17025602)
5. Hassan HG, el Sharkawy TY, Renck H, et al. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35:442-447.
6. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52:191-198.
7. Rai MR, Dering A, Verghese C. The GlideScope system: a clinical assessment of performance. Anaesthesia 2005; 60:60-64.
8. Hung OR, Pytka S, Morris I, et al. Clinical trial of a new lightwand device (Trachlight) to intubate the trachea. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:509-514.
9. Hung OR, Pytka S, Morris I, et al. Lightwand intubation. II: Clinical trial of a new lightwand for tracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42:826-830.
10. Stout DM, Bishop MJ, Dwersteg JF, Cullen BF. Correlation ofendotracheal tube size with sore throat and hoarseness following general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1987; 67:419-421.
11. Friedman PG, Rosenberg MK, Lebenbom-Mansour M. A comparison of light wand and suspension laryngoscopic intubation techniques in outpatients. Anesth Analg 1997; 85:578-582.
12. Kovac LA. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:63-79.
13. Li P, He N, Xue FS. The adverse physiologic responses to intubation and its prevention. In: Xue FS, editor. Modern airwaymanagement-critical procedure for anesthesia and intensive care. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University Publishing House; 2002. pp. 1020-1030.
14. Prys-Roberts C. Hypertension and anesthesia: 50 years on. Anesthesiology 1979; 50:281-284.
15. Takahashi S, Mizutani T, Miyabe M, Toyooka H. Hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation with laryngoscope versus lightwand intubating device (trachlight) in adults with normal airway. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:480-484.
16. Agro F, Barzoi G, Montecchia F. Tracheal intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope or a GlideScope® in 15 patients with cervical spine immobilization. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90:705-706.
17. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 2007; 19:245-250.
18. Hirabayashi Y, Hiruta M, Kawakami T, et al. Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:253-255.
19. Huang WT, Huang CY, Chung YT. Clinical comparisons between GlideScope video laryngoscope and Trachlight in simulated cervical spine instability. J Clin Anesth 2007; 19:110-114.
20. Martis C, Athanassiades S. Postthyroidectomy laryngeal edema. A survey of fifty-four cases. Am J Surg 1971; 122:58-60.
21. Jensen PJ, Hommelgaard P, Sondergaard P, Eriksen S. Sore throat after operation. Influence of tracheal intubation, intracuff pressure and type of cuff. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54:453-457.
22. Kihara S, Brimacombe J, Yaguchi Y, et al. Hemodynamic responses among three tracheal intubation devices in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg 2003; 96:890-895.
23. Nishikawa K, Omote K, Kawana S, Namiki A. A comparison of hemodynamic changes after endotracheal intubation by using the lightwand device and the laryngoscope in normotensive and hypertensive patients. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:1023-1027.