A comparison of the forces applied to a manikin during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope® and Macintosh laryngoscopes

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1098-1102

  Russell, T ^a,b   Lee, C ^a,b   Firat, M ^a,c   Cooper, R M ^a,c  

^a TORONTO GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complications; Laryngoscopy; Trauma

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; FORCE; GLOTTIS; INTUBATION; LARYNGOSCOPE; LARYNGOSCOPY; SENSOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RESPIRATION CONTROL; TONGUE;

AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MANIKINS; TONGUE;

EID: 84855393330     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: 14480271     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1103900619     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Thomson IR. The haemodynamic response to intubation: a perspective. Can J Anaesth 1989; 36:367-369.
2. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59:295-299. (Pubitemid 17025602)
3. Akbar AN, Muzi M, Lopatka CW, Ebert TJ. Neurocirculatory responses to intubation with either an endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway in humans. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:194-197. (Pubitemid 26139022)
4. Hassan HG, el-Sharkawy TY, Renck H, Mansour G, Fouda A. Hemodynamic and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with vs. without endotracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35:442-447.
5. Sawin PD, Todd MM, Traynelis VC, Farrell SB, Nader A, Sato Y et al. Cervical spine motion with direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. An in vivo cinefluoroscopic study of subjects without cervical abnormality. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:26-36. (Pubitemid 26234691)
6. LeGrand SA, Hindman BJ, Dexter F, Weeks JB, Todd MM. Craniocervical motion during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation with the Macintosh and Miller blades: an in vivo cinefluoroscopic study. Anesthesiology 2007; 107:884-891. (Pubitemid 350175670)
7. Kovac AL. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth 1996; 8:63-79. (Pubitemid 26068230)
8. Fox EJ, Sklar GS, Hill CH, Villanueva R, King BD. Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1977; 47:524-525. (Pubitemid 8240141)
9. Waddington MS, Paech MJ, Kurowski IHS, Reed CJ, Nicholls GJ, Guy DT et al. The influence of gender and experience on intubation ability and technique: a manikin study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2009; 37:791-801.
10. Bishop MJ, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1992; 74:411-414.
11. Bucx MJ, van Geel RT, Scheck PA, Stijnen T, Erdmann W. Forces applied during laryngoscopy and their relationship with patient characteristics. Influence of height, weight, age, sex and presence of maxillary incisors. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:601-603.
12. Hastings RH, Hon ED, Nghiem C, Wahrenbrock EA. Force, torque, and stress relaxation with direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:456-461. (Pubitemid 26072943)
13. Santoni BG, Hindman BJ, Puttlitz CM, Weeks JB, Johnson N, Maktabi MA et al. Manual in-line stabilization increases pressures applied by the laryngoscope blade during direct laryngoscopy and orotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:24-31.
14. Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth 2005; 52:191-198. (Pubitemid 40467979)
15. Lee RA, van Zundert AAJ, Maassen RLJG, Willems RJ, Beeke LP, Schaaper JN et al. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:187-191.
16. Bucx MJ, van Geel RT, Wegener JT, Robers C, Stijnen T. Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42:144-149.
17. Bucx MJ, van Geel RT, Scheck PA, Stijnen T. Cardiovascular effects of forces applied during laryngoscopy. The importance of tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:1029-1033. (Pubitemid 23040733)
18. Evans A, Vaughan RS, Hall JE, Mecklenburgh J, Wilkes AR. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:869-873. (Pubitemid 37059137)
19. Hastings RH, Hon ED, Nghiem C, Wahrenbrock EA. Force, torque, and stress relaxation with direct laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 1996; 82:456-461. (Pubitemid 26072943)
20. McCoy EP, Austin BA, Mirakhur RK, Wong KC. A new device for measuring and recording the forces applied during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1995; 50:139-143.
21. Yang JH, Kim Y-M, Chung HS, Cho J, Lee H-M, Kang G-H et al. Comparison of four manikins and fresh frozen cadaver models for direct laryngoscopic orotracheal intubation training. Emerg Med J 2010; 27:13-16.
22. Jordan GM, Silsby J, Bayley G, Cook TM. Evaluation of four manikins as simulators for teaching airway management procedures specified in the Difficult Airway Society guidelines, and other advanced airway skills. Anaesthesia 2007; 62:708-712. (Pubitemid 46929965)