The effects of entry timing and business model innovation on performance: The case of the global MP3 player market

Asian Journal of Technology Innovation

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 133-147

  Park, Sangmoon ^a  

^a Kangwon National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

business model innovation; market entry; new industry; order of entry; performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860830869     PISSN: 19761597     EISSN: 21586721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19761597.2011.587669     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Agarwal, R., Sarkar, M. and Echambadi, R. 2002. The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: a life cycle approach. Academy of Management Journal, 45,5: 971-994.
2. Ahuja, G. and Lampert, C. M. 2001. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 521-543.
3. Bayus, B. and Agarwal, R. 2007. The role of pre-entry experience, entry timing, and product technology strategy in explaining firm survival. Management Science, 53: 1887-1902.
4. Chesbrough, H. and Rosenbloom, R. S. 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 529-555.
5. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
6. Chesbrough, H. 2006. Open Innovation Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Christensen, C. 1997. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
8. Christensen, C. and Bower, J. L. 1996. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 197-218.
9. Christensen, C., Suarez, F. and Utterback, J. M. 1998. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Science, 44: S207-S220.
10. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
11. Cooper, A. C. and Schendel, D. 1976. "Strategic responses to technological threats". In Business Horizons (19) 61-69
12. Euromonitor International (2009), Portable Audio Market Sizes: Global Market Information Database (accessed July 30, 2009)
13. Golder, P. and Tellis, G. 1993. Pioneer advantage: marketing logic or marketing legend?. Journal of Marketing Research, 30: 158-170.
14. Helfat, C. and Lieberman, M. 2002. The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11: 725-760.
15. Henderson, R. 1993. Under-investment and incompetence as responses to radical innovation: evidence from the photolithographic alignment equipment industry. RAND Journal of Economics, 24: 248-271.
16. Henderson, R. and Clark, K. B. 1990. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
17. IBM. 2006. The Global CEO Study 2006: Expanding the Innovation Horizon, Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services
18. Kalyanaram, G., Robinson, W. T. and Urban, G. L. 1995. Order of market entry: established empirical generalizations, emerging generalizations, and future research. Marketing Science, 14: G212-G221.
19. Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R. and Peterson, R. A. 1992. First-mover advantage: a synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56: 33-52.
20. Klepper, S. and Simons, K. 2000. Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U.S. television receiver industry. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 997-1016.
21. Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111-125.
22. Lieberman, G. and Montgomery, D. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 41-58.
23. Lieberman, G. and Montgomery, D. 1998. First-mover (dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 1111-1125.
24. Lilien, G. and Yoon, E. 1990. The timing of competitive market entry: an exploratory study of new industrial products. Management Science, 36: 568-585.
25. Magretta, J. 2002. Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80: 86-92.
26. March, J. and Simon, H. 1958. Organizations, New York: Wiley.
27. Markides, C. and Geroski, P. 2005. Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Mitchell, W. 1989. Whether and when? Probability and timing of incumbents' entry into emerging industrial subfields'. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 208-230.
29. Musmann, H. G. 2006. Genesis of the MP3 Audio Coding Standard. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 52: 1043-1049.
30. Narasimhan, C. and Zhang, Z. J. 2000. Market entry strategy under firm heterogeneity and asymmetric payoffs. Marketing Science, 19: 313-327.
31. Park, G. and Kang, J. 2010. Entry conditions, firm strategies and their relationships to the innovation performance of an emerging green industry: the case of the solar cell industry. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 18: 21-42.
32. Robinson, W. 1988. Sources of market pioneer advantages: the case of industrial goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research, 25: 87-94.
33. Robinson, W. and Fornell, C. 1985. Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer good industries. Journal of Marketing Research, 22: 305-317.
34. Robinson, W. and Min, S. 2002. Is the first to market the first to fail? Empirical evidence for industrial goods businesses. Journal of Marketing Research, 34: 120-128.
35. Rothaermel, F. T. 2001. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 687-699.
36. Sarkar, M., Echambadi, R., Agarwal, R. and Sen, B. 2006. The effect of the innovative environment on exit of entrepreneurial firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 519-539.
37. Seo, K. S. 2008. Daehanmingook Teuksanpoom MP3Peuleier Jeonjang (Korean Specialty: MP3 Player War), Seoul: Hanwool.
38. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. and Rangaswamy, A. 2004. First in, first out? The effects of network externalities on pioneer survival. Journal of Marketing, 68: 41-58.
39. Suarez, F. and Lanzolla, G. 2007. The role of environmental dynamics in building a theory of first-mover advantages. Academy of Management Review, 32: 377-392.
40. Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15: 285-305.
41. Timmers, P. 1998. Business models for electronic markets. Electronic Markets, 8: 3-8.
42. Tripsas, M. 1997. Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 119-142.
43. Tripsas, M. and Gavetti, G. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 1147-1161.
44. Tushman, M. L. and Anderson, P. 1986. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439-465.
45. Utterback, J. 1994. Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
46. Zott, C. and Amit, R. 2007. Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18: 181-202.
47. Zott, C. and Amit, R. 2008. The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm. Strategic Management Journal, 29: 1-26.