Evaluating iPhone recordings for acoustic voice assessment

Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 122-130

  Lin, Emily ^a   Hornibrook, Jeremy ^b   Ormond, Tika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b CHRISTCHURCH HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

IPhone; Perturbation; Spectral measures; Voice quality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; LARYNX DISORDER; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE PHONE; PHONATION; SOUND DETECTION; SPEECH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOICE; VOICE DISORDER;

ADULT; AGED; CELLULAR PHONE; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL DISEASES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONATION; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH RECOGNITION SOFTWARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 84860797693     PISSN: 10217762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000335874     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Lieberman PH: Perturbations of vocal pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 1961; 33: 597-603.
2. Beckett RL: Pitch perturbation as a function of subjective vocal constriction. Folia Phoniatr 1969; 21: 416-425.
3. Koike Y: Vowel amplitude modulations in patients with laryngeal disease. J Acoust Soc Am 1969; 45: 839-844.
4. Horii Y: Fundamental frequency perturbation observed in sustained phonation. J Speech Hear Res 1979; 22: 5-19. (Pubitemid 9177051)
5. Sorensen D, Horii Y: Directional perturbation factors for jitter and for shimmer. J Commun Disord 1984; 17: 143-151.
6. Titze IR: Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis: Summary Statement. Denver, National Center for Voice and Speech, 1995.
7. Titze IR, Liang H: Comparison of F0 extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 1120-1133. (Pubitemid 23354168)
8. Deem J, Manning WH, Knack JV, Matesich JS: The automatic extraction of pitch perturbation using microcomputers: some methodological considerations. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 689-697. (Pubitemid 19230601)
9. Bielamowicz S, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Dauer MS, Berke GS: Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 126-134.
10. Carson CP, Ingrisano DRS, Eggleston KD: The effect of noise on computer-aided measures of voice: a comparison of CSpeechSP and the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program software using the CSL 4300B Module and Multi-Speech for Windows. J Voice 2003; 17: 12-20. (Pubitemid 36538015)
11. Maryn Y, Corthals P, de Bodt M, Cauwenberge PV, Deliyski D: Perturbation measures of voice: a comparative study between multidimensional voice program and Pratt. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2009; 61: 217-227.
12. Karnell MP, Hall KD, Landahl KL: Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation measurements among three analysis systems. J Voice 1995; 9: 383-393.
13. Titze IR, Winholtz WS: Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 1177-1190. (Pubitemid 23354173)
14. Gelfer MP, Fendel DM: Comparisons of jitter, shimmer, and signal-to-noise ratio from directly digitized versus taped voice samples. J Voice 1995; 9: 378-382.
15. Jiang J, Lin E, Hanson DG: Effect of tape recording on perturbation measures. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 1031-1041. (Pubitemid 28450231)
16. Deliyski DD, Evans MK, Shaw HS: Influence of data acquisition environment on accuracy of acoustic voice quality measurements. J Voice 2005; 19: 176-186. (Pubitemid 40724891)
17. Karnell MP, Scherer RS, Fischer LB: Comparison of acoustic voice perturbation measures among three independent voice laboratories. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 781-799.
18. Winholtz WS, Titze IR: Suitability of Minidisc (MD) recordings for voice perturbation analysis. J Voice 1998; 12: 138-142. (Pubitemid 28294334)
19. Fairbanks G: Voice and Articulation Drillbook. New York, Harper & Row, 1960.
20. Milenkovic P: Least mean square measures of voice perturbation. J Speech Hear Res 1987; 30: 529-538. (Pubitemid 18033316)
21. de Krom G: Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 794-811.
22. Hanson HM, Stevens KN, Hong-Kwang JK, Chen MY, Slifka J: Towards models of phonation. J Phonet 2001; 29: 451-480.
23. Löfqvist A, Mandersson B: Long-time average spectrum of speech and voice signals. Folia Phoniatr 1987; 39: 221-229.
24. Sorensen D, Horii Y: Cigarette smoking and voice fundamental frequency. J Commun Disord 1982; 15: 135-144.
25. Roy N, Tasko SM: Speaking fundamental frequency (SFF) changes following successful management of functional dysphonia. J Speech-Lang Pathol Audiol 1994; 18: 115- 120.
26. Kotby MN, Titze, IR, Saleh MM, Berry DA: Fundamental frequency stability in functional dysphonia. Acta Otolaryngol 1993; 113: 439-444. (Pubitemid 23124008)
27. Wolfe V, Martin D: Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity. J Commun Disord 1997; 30: 403-416. (Pubitemid 27400925)
28. Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks D: Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 298-306. (Pubitemid 20200323)
29. Bhuta T, Patrick L, Garnett JD: Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. J Voice 2004; 18: 299-304. (Pubitemid 39164280)
30. Omori K, Kacker A, Carroll LM, Reiley WD, Blaugrund SM: Singing power ratio: quantitative evaluation of singing voice quality. J Voice 1996; 10: 228-235. (Pubitemid 26274996)
31. Liu HM, Tsao FM, Kuhl PK: The effect of reduced vowel working space on speech intelligibility in Mandarin-speaking young adults with cerebral palsy. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 3879-3889. (Pubitemid 40807423)
32. Roy N, Nissen SL, Dromey C, Sapir S: Articulatory changes in muscle tension dysphonia: evidence of vowel space expansion following manual circumlaryngeal therapy. J Commun Disord 2009; 42: 124-135.
33. Solomon NP, Helou LB, Stoiadinovic A: Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V. J Voice 2011; 25: 7-14.
34. Hirano M: Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice; in Arnold GE, Winckel F, Wyke BD (eds): Disorders of Human Communication, 5, Clinical Examination of Voice. New York, Springer, 1981, pp 81-84.
35. Karnell MP, Melton SD, Childers JM, Coleman TC, Dailey SA, Hoffman HT: Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders. J Voice 2007; 21: 576-590. (Pubitemid 47302225)
36. Atal BS: Automatic speaker recognition based on pitch contours. J Acoust Soc Am 1972; 52: 1687-1697.
37. Whalen DH, Levitt AG: The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. J Phonet 1995; 23: 349- 366.
38. Gelfer MP: Fundamental frequency, intensity, and vowel selection: effects on measures of phonatory stability. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 1189-1198.
39. LaBlance GR, Maves MD: Acoustic characteristics of post-thyroplasty patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992; 107: 558-563.
40. Hufnagle J, Hufnagle K: An investigation of the relationship between speaking fundamental frequency and vocal quality improvement. J Commun Disord 1984; 17: 95- 100.
41. Hillman RE, Holmberg EB, Perkell JS, Walsh M, Vaughan C: Phonatory function associated with hyperfunctionally related vocal fold lesions. J Voice 1990; 4: 52-63. (Pubitemid 20139408)
42. Ng ML, Gilbert HR, Lerman JW: Some aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of acute laryngitis. J Voice 1997; 11: 356-363. (Pubitemid 27377225)
43. Titze IR, Luschei ES, Hirano M: Role of the thyroarytenoid muscle in regulation of fundamental frequency. J Voice 1989; 3: 213-224. (Pubitemid 19212149)