Perturbation measures of voice: A comparative study between multi-dimensional voice program and praat

Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 217-226

  Maryn, Youri ^a   Corthals, Paul ^a,b   De Bodt, Marc ^d   Van Cauwenberge, Paul ^c   Deliyski, Dimitar ^e  

^a Sint Jan General Hospital   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE GHENT   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Computerized Speech Lab; Multi Dimensional Voice Program; Perturbation measurement; Praat

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNX DISORDER; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COMPUTERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGOSCOPY; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONATION; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOFTWARE; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; VOICE; VOICE DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67649866066     PISSN: 10217762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000227999     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Titze IR: Principles of Voice Production. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1994.
2. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF: Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, 2000.
3. Lieberman P: Some acoustic measures of the fundamental periodicity of normal and pathologic larynges. J Acoust Soc Am 1963; 35: 344-353.
4. Read C, Buder EH, Kent RD: Speech analysis systems: an evaluation. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 314-332.
5. Howard DM: The real and non-real in speech measurements. Proc 2nd Int Workshop on Models and Analysis of Vocal Emissions for Biomedical Applications MAVEBA, Florence, 2001.
6. Kay Elemetrics Corp: Multi-Speech and CSL Software: Software Instruction Manual. Lincoln Park, Kay Elemetrics, 2004.
7. Kay Elemetrics Corp: Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) Model 5105: Software Instruction Manual. Lincoln Park, Kay Elemetrics, 2003.
8. Boersma P: Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot Int 2001; 5: 341-345.
9. Boersma P, Weenink D: Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 4.3.14); computer program. Amsterdam, Institute of Phonetic Sciences. http://www.praat.org (accessed May 5, 2005).
10. Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM: Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 298-306.
11. Dejonckere PH, Remacle M, Fresnel-Elbaz E, Woisard V, Crevier-Buchman L, Millet B: Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 1996; 117: 219-224.
12. Hirano M: Clinical Examination of Voice. Vienna, Springer, 1981.
13. Wolfe V, Martin D: Acoustic correlates of dysphonia: type and severity. J Commun Disord 1997; 30: 403-416.
14. Bhuta T, Patrick L, Garnett JD: Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements. J Voice 2004; 18: 299-304.
15. De Bodt M: A Framework of Voice Assessment: The Relation between Subjective and Objective Parameters in the Judgement of Normal and Pathological Voice; doct diss University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 1997.
16. Kreiman J, Gerratt B: Measuring vocal quality; in Kent RD, Ball MJ (eds): Voice Quality Measurement. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group, 2000, pp 73-101.
17. Titze IR, Winholtz WS: Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 1177-1190.
18. Winholtz WS, Titze IR: Miniature headmounted microphone for voice perturbation analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 894-899.
19. Deliyski DD, Evans MK, Shaw HS: Influence of data acquisition environment on accuracy of acoustic voice quality measurements. J Voice 2005; 19: 176-186.
20. Deliyski DD, Shaw HS, Evans MK: Influence of sampling rate on accuracy and reliability of acoustic voice analysis. Logop Phoniatr Vocol 2005; 30: 55-62.
21. Winholtz WS, Titze IR: Suitability of minidisc (MD) recordings for voice perturbation analysis. J Voice 1998; 12: 138-142.
22. Bielamowicz S, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Dauer MS, Berke GS: Comparison of voice analysis systems for perturbation measurement. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 39: 126-134.
23. Karnell MP, Hall KD, Landahl KL: Comparison of fundamental frequency and perturbation measurements among three analysis systems. J Voice 1995; 9: 383-393.
24. Smits I, Ceuppens P, De Bodt MS: Comparative study of acoustic voice measurements by means of Dr. Speech and Computerized Speech Lab. J Voice 2005; 19: 187-196.
25. Rabinov CR, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Bielamowicz S: Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measures of jitter. J Speech Hear Res 1995; 38: 26-32.
26. Deliyski DD, Shaw HS, Evans MK, Vesselinov R: Regression tree approach to studying factors influencing acoustic voice analysis. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2006; 58: 274-288.
27. Titze IR, Liang H: Comparison of F0 extraction methods for high-precision voice perturbation measurements. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 1120-1133.
28. Awan SN, Scarpino SE: Measures of vocal F0 from continuous speech samples: an interprogram comparison. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 2004; 28: 122-131.
29. Roark RM: Frequency and voice: perspectives in the time domain. J Voice 2006; 20: 325-354.
30. Deliyski D, Shaw E: Acoustic measurement of jitter and shimmer: inter- and intrasystem relationships. Proc ASHA Convention, Miami Beach, November 2006.
31. Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalski C, Silbergleit A, Jacobson G, Benninger MS: The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1997; 6: 66-70. (Pubitemid 127116315)
32. Wuyts FL, De Bodt MS, Molenberghs G, Remacle M, Heylen L, Millet B, Van Lierde K, Raes J, Van de Heyning PH: The Dysphonia Severity Index: an objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparameter approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2000; 43: 796-809.
33. AKG Acoustics: C420: User Instruction. MicroMic series II. München, AKG Acoustics Harman Pro, 2000.
34. Shure Inc: Model Prologue 14H User Guide. Evanston, Shure, 2003.
35. Deliyski DD: Acoustic model and evaluation of pathological voice production. Proc Eurospeech, Berlin, September 1993.
36. Boersma P: Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics- to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Proc Inst Phonet Sci, Amsterdam, 1993, vol 17, pp 97-110.
37. Deliyski DD, Shaw HS, Evans MK: Adverse effects of environmental noise on acoustic voice quality measurements. J Voice 2005; 19: 15-28.
38. Titze IR: Workshop on acoustic voice analysis: summary statement. Iowa City, National Center for Voice and Speech, 1995.
39. Boersma P: Stemmen meten met Praat. Stem-Spraak-Taalpathol 2004; 12: 237-251.