Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V

Journal of Voice

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages e7-

  Solomon, Nancy Pearl ^a   Helou, Leah B ^a   Stojadinovic, Alexander ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

CAPE V; Perceptual ratings; Reliability; Thyroidectomy; Voice quality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPEECH DISORDER; THYROIDECTOMY; VOICE;

EID: 78651314875     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. N. Teitler Examiner bias: influence of patient history on perceptual ratings of videostroboscopy J Voice 9 1995 95 105
2. M. Hirano Clinical Examination of the Voice 1981 Springer Verlag New York pp. 81-84
3. G.B. Kempster, B.R. Gerratt, K. Verdolini Abbott, J. Barkmeier-Kraemer, and R.E. Hillman Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol Am J Speech Lang Pathol 18 2009 124 132
4. M.P. Karnell, S.D. Melton, J.M. Childes, T.C. Coleman, S.A. Dailey, and H.T. Hoffman Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders J Voice 21 2007 576 590
5. F.L. Wuyts, M.S. De Bodt, and P.H. Van de Heyning Is the reliability of a visual analog scale higher than an ordinal scale? An experiment with the GRBAS scale for the perceptual evaluation of dysphonia J Voice 13 1999 508 517
6. P. Yu, J. Revis, F.L. Wuyts, M. Zanaret, and A. Giovanni Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale Official Organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) Folia Phoniatr Logop 54 2002 271 281
7. J. Kreiman, B.R. Gerratt, and K. Precoda Listener experience and perception of voice quality J Speech Hear Res 33 1990 103 115
8. J. Kreiman, B.R. Gerratt, K. Precoda, and G.S. Berke Individual differences in voice quality perception J Speech Hear Res 35 1992 512 520
9. T.L. Eadie, and C.R. Baylor The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice J Voice 20 2006 527 544
10. A.L. Webb, P.N. Carding, I.J. Deary, K. MacKenzie, N. Steen, and J.A. Wilson The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261 2004 429 434
11. E.M. Yiu, K.M. Chan, and R.S. Mok Reliability and confidence in using a paired comparison paradigm in perceptual voice quality evaluation Clin Linguist Phon 21 2007 129 145
12. J. Muñoz, E. Mendoza, M.D. Fresneda, G. Carballo, and P. López Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice Folia Phoniatr Logop 55 2003 102 114
13. C.P. Lombardi, M. Raffaelli, L. D'Alatri, M.R. Marchese, M. Rigante, G. Paludetti, and R. Bellantone Voice and swallowing changes after thyroidectomy in patients without inferior laryngeal nerve injuries Surgery 140 2006 1026 1034
14. C. Page, R. Zaatar, A. Biet, and V. Strunski Subjective voice assessment after thyroid surgery: a prospective study of 395 patients Indian J Med Sci 61 2007 448 454
15. D.L. Sinagra, M.R. Montesinos, and V.A. Tacchi Voice changes after thyroidectomy without recurrent laryngeal nerve injury J Am Coll Surg 199 2004 556 560
16. L. Soylu, S. Ozbas, H.Y. Uslu, and S. Kocak The evaluation of the causes of subjective voice disturbances after thyroid surgery Am J Surg 194 2007 317 322
17. A. Stojadinovic, A.R. Shaha, R.F. Orlikoff, A. Nissan, M. Kornak, and B. Singh Prospective functional voice assessment in patients undergoing thyroid surgery Ann Surg 236 2002 823 832
18. M.S. De Bodt, F.L. Wuyts, P.H. Van de Heyning, and C. Croux Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality J Voice 11 1997 74 80
19. P.H. Dejonckere, C. Obbens, G.M. de Moor, and G.H. Wieneke Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 45 1993 76 83
20. B. Millet, and P.H. Dejonckere What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniatr Logop 50 1998 305 310
21. V.I. Wolfe, D.P. Martin, and C.I. Palmer Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners J Speech Lang Hear Res 43 2000 697 705
22. H. Yamaguchi, R. Shrivastav, M.L. Andrews, and S. Niimi A comparison of voice quality ratings made by Japanese and American listeners using the GRBAS scale Folia Phoniatr Logop 55 2003 147 157
23. R.I. Zraick, K. Wendel, and L. Smith-Olinde The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice J Voice 19 2005 574 581
24. J. Oates Auditory-perceptual evaluation of disordered voice quality Folia Phoniatr Logop 61 2009 49 56