Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements

Journal of Voice

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 299-304

  Bhuta, Tarika ^a   Patrick, Linda ^a   Garnett, James D ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acoustic voice analysis; GRBAS; MDVP; Perceptual voice analysis; Voice evaluation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NOISE; PATHOLOGIST; PERCEPTION; PHONATION; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VOICE;

EID: 4444276813     PISSN: 08921997     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Klein S., Piccirillo J.F., Painter C. Comparative contrast of voice measurements. Oto Head Neck Surg. 123:2000;164-169
2. Piccirillo J.F., Painter C., Haiduk A., Fuller D., Fredrickson J. Assessment of two objective voice function indices. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 107:1998;396-400
3. Carding P.N., Docherty G., Horsley I.A. A study of the effectiveness of voice therapy in the treatment of forty-five patients with non-organic dysphonia. J Voice. 13:(1):1999;76-113
4. Wuyts F., Debodt M., Molenberghs G., et al. The dysphonia severity index: An objective measure of vocal quality based on a multiparametric approach. J Speech Hear Res. 43:2000;796-804
5. Dejonckere P.H., Remacle M., Fresnel-Elbaz E., Woisard V., Crevier-Buchman L., Millet B. Differentiated perceptual evaluation of pathological voice quality: reliability and correlations with acoustic measurements. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 117:1996;219-224
6. Dekrom G. Some spectral correlates of pathological breathy and rough voice quality for different types of vowel fragments. J Speech Hear Res. 38:1995;794-811
7. Parsa V., Jamieson D.G. Identification of pathological voices using glottal noise measures. J Speech Hear Res. 43:2000;469-485
8. Martin D., Fitch J., Wolfe V. Pathological voice type and the acoustic prediction of severity. J Speech Hear Res. 38:1995;765-771
9. Dejonckere P.H., Obbens C., Demoor G.M., Wienecke G.H. Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: Reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniat Logopaed. 45:1993;76-83
10. Wolfe V.I., Martin D.P., Palmer C.I. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naïve listeners. J Speech Hear Res. 43:2000;697-705
11. Eskenazi L., Childers D.G., Hicks D.M. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res. 33:1990;298-306
12. Yiu E., Worrall L., Longland J., Mitchell C. Analyzing vocal quality of connected speech using Kay's computerized speech lab: a preliminary finding. Clin Ling Phon. 14:2000;295-305
13. Millet B., Dejonckere P.H. What determines the differences in perceptual rating of dysphonia between experienced raters? Folia Phoniat Logopead. 50:1998;305-310
14. Rabinov C.R., Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Bielamowics S. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measures of jitter. J Speech Hear Res. 38:1995;26-32
15. Carding P., Carlson E., Epstein R., Mathieson L., Shewell C. Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom. Log Phon Vocol. 23:2000;133-138
16. Yiu E. Limitations of perturbation measures in clinical acoustic voice analysis. Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear. 4:1999;155-166
17. Revis J., Giovanni A., Wuyts F., Triglia J.M. Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis. Folia Phoniat Logopaed. 51:1999;108-116
18. Novak A., Vokral J. Acoustic parameters for the evaluation of voice of future voice professionals. Folia Phoniat Logopaed. 47:1995;279-285
19. Behrman A., Orlikoff R.F. Instrumentation in voice assessment and treatment: what's the use? Amer J Speech-Lang Pathol. 6:1997;9-16