Nanostructuring polyetheretherketone for medical implants

European Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-15

  Althaus, Jasmin ^a,b,c,d   Padeste, Celestino ^b   Köser, Joachim ^c   Pieles, Uwe ^c   Peters, Kirsten ^d   Müller, Bert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Auto fluorescence; Confocal laser scanning microscopy Human mesenchymal stem cells; Nanostructures; Oxygen and ammonia plasma treatments; Polyetheretherketone (PEEK); Rat 2 fibroblasts

Indexed keywords

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; AMMONIA PLASMA; AMMONIA PLASMA TREATMENT; AUTO-FLUORESCENCE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MORPHOLOGY; CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPY; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS; IN-VITRO; MEAN SIZE; MEDICAL IMPLANTS; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NANO-METER SCALE; NANO-STRUCTURING; NANOSTRUCTURED SURFACE; OXYGEN PLASMAS; PLASMA INTENSITY; PLASMA TREATMENT; PROCESS GAS; PROCESSING CONDITION; WHOLE CELL;

AMMONIA; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CELL CULTURE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; ETHERS; FLUORESCENCE; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; LASERS; NANOSTRUCTURES; OXYGEN; PLASMA APPLICATIONS; PROTEINS; STEM CELLS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TISSUE;

PLASMAS;

AMMONIA; NANOMATERIAL; OXYGEN; POLYETHERETHERKETONE;

ANIMAL CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENSITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMPLANT; IN VITRO STUDY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PLASMA GAS; RAT; ROUGHNESS;

EID: 84860748987     PISSN: 16625986     EISSN: 1662596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ejnm-2011-0001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Ponche A, Bigerelle M, Anselme K. Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 1: physico-chemical effects. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010;224:1471-86.
2. Anselme K, Ponche A, Bigerelle M. Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 2: biological aspects. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2010;224:1487-507.
3. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89. (Pubitemid 44233625)
4. Riedel M, Müiler B, Wintermantel E. Protein adsorption and monocyte activation on germanium nanopyramids. Biomaterials 2001;22:2307-16. (Pubitemid 32594754)
5. Variola F, Brunski JB, Orsini G, Tambasco de Oliveira P, Wazen R, Nanci A. Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: state-of-the art and perspectives. Nanoscale 2011;3: 335-53.
6. Dohan Ehrenfest D, Coelho P, Kang B, Sul Y, Albrektsson T. Classification of osseointegrated implant surfaces: materials, chemistry and topography. Trends Biotechnol 2010;28:198-206.
7. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007;28:4845-69. (Pubitemid 47285335)
8. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, Andar A, Riehle MO, Herzyk P, et al. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 2007;6:997-1003. (Pubitemid 350210577)
9. Hunter A, Archer CW, Walker PS, Blunn GW. Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. Biomaterials 1995;16:287-95.
10. Briem D, Strametz S, Schröder K, Meenen NM, Lehmann W, Linhart W, et al. Response of primary fibroblasts and osteoblasts to plasma treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surfaces. J Mater Sci-Mater M 2005;16:671-7. (Pubitemid 40908902)
11. Risse W, Sogha DY. Synthesis of soluble high molecular weight poly(aryl1 ether ketones) containing bulky substitutents. Macromolecules 1990;23:4029-33. (Pubitemid 20733902)
12. Peters K, Salamon A, Van Vlierberghe S, Richly J, Kreutzer M, Neumann H-G, et al. A new approach for adipose tissue regeneration based on human mesenchymal stem cells in contact to hydrogels-an in vitro study. Adv Eng Mater 2007;11:B155-61.
13. Ha SW, Hauert R, Ernst KH, Wintermantel E. Surface analysis of chemically-etched and plasma-treated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) for biomedical applications. Surf Coat Tech 1997;96:293-9. (Pubitemid 127422061)
14. Ha SW, Kirch M, Birchler F, Eckert KL, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, et al. Surface activation of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and formation of calcium phosphate coatings by precipitation. J Mater Sci-Mater M 1997;8:683-90. (Pubitemid 27485097)
15. Cortese B, Morgan H. Controlling the wettability of hierarchically structured thermoplastics. Langmuir 2011; dx.doi.org/10.1021/la203741b.
16. Tsougeni K, Vourdas N, Tserepi A, Gogolides E, Cardinaud C. Mechanisms of oxygen plasma nanotexturing of organic polymer surfaces: from stable super hydrophilic to super hydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir 2009;6:11748-59.
17. Geiger B. A 130K protein from chicken gizzard: its localization at the termini of microfilament bundles in cultured chicken cells. Cell 1979;18:193-205. (Pubitemid 10228251)
18. Müiler B, Riedel M, Michel R, Paul SMD, Hofer R, Heger D, et al. Impact of nanometer-scale roughness on contact-angle hysteresis and globulin adsorption. J Vac Sci Technol B 2001;19: 1715-20. (Pubitemid 33012167)
19. Müiler B. Natural Formation of nanostructures: from fundamentals in metal heteroepitaxy to applications in optics and biomaterials science. Surf Rev Lett 2001;8:169-228.
20. Lord MS, Foss M, Besenbacher F. Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response. Nano Today 2010;5:66-78.
21. Latour R. Biomaterials: Protein-surface Interactions. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Bioengineering. 2008: pp. 27-284.
22. Chan CM, Ko TM, Hiraoka H. Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons. Surf Sci Rep 1996;24:1-54. (Pubitemid 126383843)
23. Engel E, Michiardi A. Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: the materials side. Trends Biotechnol 2008;26:39-47. (Pubitemid 350298598)