Tracking On-line metacognition: Monitoring and regulating comprehension in reading

Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 209-229

  Kinnunen, Riitta ^a   Vauras, Marja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860718321     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6546-2_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (50)

1. Baker, L. (1984). Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency, and type of standard. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 289-311.
2. Baker, L. (1985). How do we know when we don't understand? Standards for evaluating comprehension. In D. Forrest-Pressley, G. McKinnon, & T. Waller (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance (pp. 155-205). New York, NY: Academic.
3. Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. Collins Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction. Research-based best practices (pp. 77-95). New York, NY: Guilford.
4. Baker, L., & Anderson, R. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 281-293.
5. Baker, L., & Brown, A. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. J. Pearson, M. Kamil, M. R. Barr, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353-394). New York, NY: Longman.
6. Bartsch, K., & Wellman, H. M. (1995). Children talk about the mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7. Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42.
9. Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: Metacognition, motivation and self-regulation. In A. Efklides, J. Kuhl, & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Trends and prospects in motivation research (pp. 297-323). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to elf-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist, 13, 277-287.
11. Garner, R., & Reis, R. (1981). Monitoring and resolving comprehension obstacles: An investigation of spontaneous text lookbacks among upper-grade good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 569-582.
12. George, E. (2008). Careless in red. London: Hodder & Stoughton. Grabe, M., Antes, J.
13. Thorson, I., & Kahn, H. (1987). Eye fixation patterns during informed and uninformed comprehension monitoring. Journal of Reading Behavior, 19, 123-140.
14. Grabe, M., Antes, J., Kahn, H., & Kristjanson, A. (1991). Adult and adolescent readers' comprehension monitoring performance: An investigation of monitoring accuracy and related eye movements. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 45-60.
15. Hyönä, J., Lorch, R., & Rinck, M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In J. Hyönä, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 313-334). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16. Just, M., Carpenter, P., & Wooley, J. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
17. Kaakinen, J. K., Hyönä, J., & Keenan, J. M. (2003). How prior knowledge, WMC, and relevance of information affect eye fixations in expository text. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 447-457.
18. Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (1995). Comprehension monitoring and the level of comprehension in high- and low-achieving primary school children's reading. Learning & Instruction, 5, 143-165.
19. Kinnunen, R., & Vauras, M. (2009). Comprehension monitoring in good and poor comprehenders: An eye fixation study with elementary school students. Unpublished manuscript.
20. Kinnunen, R., Vauras, M., & Niemi, P. (1998). Comprehension monitoring in beginning readers. Scientific Studies in Reading, 2, 353-375.
21. Kinnunen, R., Vauras, M., & Kajamies, A. (2009). Development of comprehension monitoring in elementary school students: Evidence from traced on-line reading. Unpublished manuscript.
22. La Greca, A. M., & Lopez, N. (1998). Social anxiety among adolescents: Linkages with peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 83-94.
23. Markman, E. M. (1979). Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies. Child Development, 50, 643-655.
24. Nilsen, E. S., Graham, S. A., Smith, S., & Chambers, C. (2008). Preschoolers' sensitivity to referential ambiguity: Evidence for a dissociation between implicit understanding and explicit behavior. Developmental Science, 11, 556-562.
25. Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 657-686.
26. Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 5-22.
27. Peterson, C., & Marrie, C. (1988). Even 4-year-olds can detect inconsistency. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 149, 119-126.
28. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
29. Revelle, G., Wellman, H., & Karabenick, J. (1985). Comprehension monitoring in preschool children. Child Development, 56, 654-663.
30. Rinck, M., Gámez, E., Díaz, J., & De Vega, M. (2003). Processing of temporal information: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 31, 77-86.
31. Rubman, C., & Waters, H. (2000). A, B seeing: The role of constructive processes in children's comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 503-514.
32. Ruffman, T. (1996). Reassessing children's comprehension monitoring skills. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 33-67). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Skarakis-Doyle, E. (2002). Young children's detection of violations in familiar stories and emerging comprehension monitoring. Discourse Processes, 33, 175-197.
34. Skarakis-Doyle, E., & Dempsey, L. (2008). The detection and monitoring of comprehension errors by preschool children with and without impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 51, 1227-1243.
35. Stothard, S., & Hulme, C. (1996). A comparison of reading comprehension and decoding difficulties in children. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 93-112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Tinker, M. (1928). Eye movement duration, pause duration, and reading time. Psychological Review, 35, 385-397.
37. van der Schoot, M., Vasbinder, A., Horsley, T, Reijntjes, A., & van Lieshout, E. (2009). Lexical ambiguity resolution good and poor comprehenders: An eye fixation and self-paced reading study in primary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 21-36.
38. van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies in discourse comprehension. London: cademic. Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., Kinnunen, R., & Salonen, P. (1992). Socioemotional and cognitive processes in training learning disabled children. In B. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp. 163-189). New York, NY: Springer.
39. Vauras, M., Kinnunen, R., & Rauhanummi, T. (1999). The role of metacognition in the context of integrated strategy intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 555-569.
40. Vauras, M., Rauhanummi, T., Kinnunen, R., & Lepola, J. (1999). Motivational vulnerability as a challenge for educational interventions. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 515-531.
41. Vauras, M. (2006). SOLE. The social in learning: Upbringing socially and academically competent, motivated, and self- and co-regulated young learners in school and family contexts. Unpublished research plan. Academy of Finland.
42. Vauras, M., Efklides, A., Kinnunen, R., Salonen, P., & Junttila, N. (2007). Mood and metacognitive experiences scale for children. Unpublished assessment scale.
43. Vauras, M., Kinnunen, R., Salonen, P., & Lehtinen, E. (2008). Emotions in comprehension monitoring and regulation. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 17.
44. Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E., & Kinnunen, R. (2009). Motivation in school from contextual and longitudinal perspective. In M. Wosnitza, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 1-23). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe-Huber.
45. Vosniadou, S., Pearson, P., & Rogers, T. (1988). What causes children's failures to detect inconsistencies in text? Representation versus comparison difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 27-39.
46. Wagoner, S. (1983). Comprehension monitoring: What it is and what we know about it. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 329-346.
47. Walczyk, J. J., Wei, M., Zha, P., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Goubert, S. E., & Cooper, A. L. (2007). Development of the interplay between automatic processes and cognitive resources in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 867-887.
48. Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. (1986). Children's comprehension monitoring and recall of inconsistent stories. Child Development, 57, 1401-1418.
49. Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. (1989). Effects of reading ability on children's comprehension evaluation and regulation. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21, 69-83.
50. Zwaan, R., & Radvansky, G. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.