Processing of temporal information: Evidence from eye movements

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 77-86

  Rinck, Mike ^a   Gámez, Elena ^b   Díaz, José M ^b   De Vega, Manuel ^b  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA LAGUNA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHRONOLOGY; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; READING; TIME;

EID: 0037233539     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196084     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ALBRECHT, J. E., & O'BRIEN, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1061-1070.
2. ANDERSON, A., GARROD, S. C., & SANFORD, A. J. (1983). The accessibility of pronomial antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 427-440.
3. BESTGEN, Y., & VONK, W. (1995). The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse processing. Discourse Processes, 19, 385-406.
4. BLANCHARD, H. E., & IRAN-NEJAD, A. (1987). Comprehension processes and eye movement patterns in the reading of surprise-ending stories. Discourse Processes, 10, 127-138.
5. CARREIRAS, M., CARRIEDO, N., ALONSO, M. A., & FERNÁNDEZ, A. (1997). The role of verb tense and verb aspect in the foregrounding of information during reading. Memory & Cognition, 25, 438-446.
6. COHEN, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. DE VEGA, M. (1995). Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 373-385.
8. DE VEGA, M., DIAZ, J. M., & LEON, I. (1997). To know or not to know: Comprehending protagonists' beliefs and their emotional consequences. Discourse Processes, 23, 169-192.
9. GERNSBACHER, M. A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. GERNSBACHER, M. A., GOLDSMITH, H. H., & ROBERTSON, R. R. W. (1992). Do readers mentally represent characters' emotional states? Cognition & Emotion, 6, 89-111.
11. GLENBERG, A. M., & LANGSTON, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 129-151.
12. GLENBERG, A. M., MEYER, M., & LINDEM, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 69-83.
13. GRAESSER, A. C., MILLIS, K. K., & ZWAAN, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
14. HAENGGI, D., GERNSBACHER, M. A., & BOLLIGER, C. A. (1994). Individual differences in situation-based inferencing during narrative text comprehension. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 79-96). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. HUITEMA, J. S., DOPKINS, S., KLEIN, C. M., & MYERS, J. L. (1993). Connecting goals and actions during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1053-1060.
16. JOHNSON-LAIRD, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. KAAKINEN, J., HYÖNÄ, J., & KEENAN, J. M. (2002). Individual differences in perspective effects on on-line text processing. Discourse Processes, 33, 159-173.
18. KINTSCH, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
19. KINTSCH, W. (1998). Comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. LORCH, R. F., JR., & LEMBERGER, C. (2001, August). Detecting inconsistencies while reading. Poster presented at the Eleventh European Conference on Eye Movements, Turku, Finland.
21. MANDLER, J. M. (1986). On the comprehension of temporal order. Language & Cognitive Processes, 1, 309-320.
22. MORROW, D. G. (1994). Spatial models created from text. In H. van Oostendorp & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Naturalistic text comprehension (pp. 57-78). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. MYERS, J. L., COOK, A. E., KAMBE, G., MASON, R. A., & O'BRIEN, E. J. (2000). Semantic and episodic effects on bridging inferences. Discourse Processes, 29, 179-199.
24. O'BRIEN, E. J., & ALBRECHT, J. E. (1992). Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 777-784.
25. OHTSUKA, K., & BREWER, W. F. (1992). Discourse organization in the comprehension of temporal order in narratives. Discourse Processes, 15, 317-336.
26. RAYNER, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Twenty years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
27. RINCK, M., HÄHNEL, A., & BECKER, G. (2001). Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 67-80.
28. SCHOOLER, J. W., & FIORE, S. M. (1997). Consciousness and the limits of language: You can't always say what you think or think what you say. In J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to consciousness (pp. 241-257). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. VAN DIJK, T. A., & KINTSCH, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
30. VAURAS, M., HYÖNÄ, J., & NIEMI, P. (1992). Comprehension of coherent and incoherent texts: Evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance. Journal of Research in Reading, 15, 39-54.
31. WILEY, J., & RAYNER, K. (2000). Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1011-1021.
32. ZWAAN, R. A. (1996). Processing narrative time shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 1196-1207.
33. ZWAAN, R. A. (1999). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 93-110). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. ZWAAN, R. A., LANGSTON, M. C., & GRAESSER, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.
35. ZWAAN, R. A., MADDEN, C. J., & WHITTEN, S. N. (2000). The presence of an event in the narrated situation affects its availability to the comprehender. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1022-1028.
36. ZWAAN, R. A., MAGLIANO, J. P., & GRAESSER, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 386-397.
37. ZWAAN, R. A., & RADVANSKY, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185.