Mating frequency and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster

American Naturalist

Volumn 171, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 10-21

  Priest, Nicholas K ^a,b   Galloway, Laura F ^a   Roach, Deborah A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inclusive fitness; Maternal effects; Multiple mating; Parental effects; Sexual conflict; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FITNESS; FLY; GROWTH RATE; LIFE HISTORY; MORTALITY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SURVIVAL; TRADE-OFF;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 38349188956     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/523944     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Arnqvist, G., and T. Nilsson. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Animal Behaviour 60:145-164.
2. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe. 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
4. Brommer, J. E. 2000. The evolution of fitness in life-history theory. Biological Review of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 75:377-404.
5. Brommer, J. E., J. Merilä, and H. Kokko. 2002. Reproductive timing and individual fitness. Ecology Letters 5:802-810.
6. Brown, W. D., A. D. Bjork, K. Schneider, and S. Pitnick. 2004. No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 58:1242-1250.
7. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models. 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
8. Chapman, T., and L. Partridge. 1996. Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263:775-759.
9. Chapman, T., L. F. Liddle, J. M. Kalb, M. F. Wolfner, and L. Partridge. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241-244.
10. Chapman, T., G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, and L. Rowe. 2003. Sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:41-47.
11. Charlesworth, B. 1970. Selection in populations with overlapping generations. I. The use of Malthusian parameters in population genetics. Theoretical Population Biology 1:352-370.
12. _. 1994. Evolution in age-structured populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Charlesworth, B., and E. L. Charnov. 1981. Kin selection in age-structured populations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 88:103-119.
14. Civetta, A., and A. G. Clark. 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97:13162-13165.
15. Clare, M. J., and L. S. Luckinbill. 1985. The effects of gene-environment interactions on the expression of longevity. Heredity 55:19-29.
16. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1988. Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
17. Cohet, Y. A., and J. R. David. 1976. Deleterious effects of copulation in Drosophila females as a function of growth temperature of both sexes. Experientia 32:696-697.
18. Cole, L. 1954. The population consequences of life-history phenomena. Quarterly Review of Biology 29:103-137.
19. Creel, S. R., and P. M. Wasser. 1994. Inclusive fitness and reproductive strategies in dwarf mongooses. Behavioral Ecology 5:339-348.
20. Elandt-Johnson, R., and N. L. Johnson. 1980. Survival models and data analysis. Wiley, New York.
21. Evans, J. P., and A. E. Magurran. 2000. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97:10074-10076.
22. Fedorka, K. M., and T. A. Mousseau. 2004. Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429:65-67.
23. Fowler, K., and L. Partridge. 1989. A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature 338:760-761.
24. Gowaty, P. A. 1996. Battles of the sexes and origins of monogamy. Pages 21-52 in J. L. Black, ed. Partnerships in birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. _. 1997. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in mating behavior. Pages 351-384 in P. A. Gowaty, ed. Feminism and evolutionary biology: boundaries, intersections, and frontiers, Chapman & Hall, New York.
26. Grafen, A. 1984. Natural selection, group selection and kin selection. Pages 62-84 in J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds. Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, London.
27. _. 1988. On the uses of lifetime reproductive success. Pages 454-471 in T. H. Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Griffin, A. S., and S. A. West. 2002. Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:15-21.
29. Hamilton, W. D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1-52.
30. Head, M. L., J. Hunt, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biology 3:289-294.
31. Holland, B., and W. R. Rice. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic co-evolution and removes reproductive load. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:5083-5088.
32. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? a review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews 75:21-64.
33. Kalb, J., A. J. DiBenedetto, and M. F. Wolfner. 1993. Probing the function of Drosophila melanogaster accessory glands by direct cell ablation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90:8093-8097.
34. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M. D. Jennions, and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:653-664.
35. Konior, M., J. Radwan, and M. Kolodziejczyk. 2001. Polyandry increases offspring fecundity in the bulb mite. Evolution 55:1893-1896.
36. Kozielska, M., A. Krzeminska, and J. Radwan. 2004. Good genes and the maternal effects of polyandry on offspring reproductive success in the bulb mite. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 271:165-170.
37. Lotka, A. J. 1939. A contribution to the theory of self-renewing aggregates, with special reference to industrial replacement. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 10:1-25.
38. McGraw, J. B., and H. Caswell. 1996. Estimation of individual fitness from life-history data. American Naturalist 147:47-64.
39. Mertz, D. B. 1971. Life history phenomena in increasing and decreasing populations. Pages 361-400 in G. P. Patil, E. G. Pielou, and W. E. Waters, eds. Symposium on statistical ecology. Vol. 2. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
40. Mousseau, T. A., and C. W. Fox. 1998. Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York.
41. Newcomer, S. D., J. A. Zeh, and D. W. Zeh. 1999. Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:10236-10241.
42. Oli, M. K. 2003. Hamilton goes empirical: estimates of inclusive fitness from life history data. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:307-311.
43. Orteiza, N., J. E. Linder, and W. R. Rice. 2005. Sexy sons from remating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:1315-1323.
44. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pages 123-166 in M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York.
45. Partridge, L., and R. Andrews. 1985. The effect of reproduction on the longevity of male Drosophila melanogaster is not caused by an acceleration of ageing. Journal of Insect Physiology 31:393-395.
46. Pischedda, A., and A. K. Chippindale. 2006. Interlocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PLoS Biology 4:2099-2103.
47. Pizzari, T., and R. R. Snook. 2003. Perspective: sexual conflict and sexual selection: chasing away paradigm shifts. Evolution 57:1223-1236.
48. Pletcher, S. D. 1999. WinModest. Version 1.0. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock.
49. Priest, N. K., D. A. Roach, and L. F. Galloway. 2007. Cross-generational fitness benefits of mating and male seminal fluid. Biology Letters, forthcoming, doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0473.
50. Prout, T., and F. McChesney. 1985. Competition among immatures affects their adult fertility: population dynamics. American Naturalist 126:521-558.
51. Qvarnström, A., and T. D. Price. 2001. Maternal effects, paternal effects and sexual selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:95-100.
52. Ram, K. R., S. Ji, and M. F. Wolfner. 2005. Fates and targets of male accessory gland proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 35:1059-1071.
53. Reynolds, J. D., and M. R. Gross. 1992. Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish, Poecilia reticulata. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 250:57-62.
54. Reznick, D., L. Nunney, and A. Tessier. 2000. Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the cost of reproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:421-425.
55. Rice, W. R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-234.
56. SAS. 2003. SAS. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
57. Sawby, R., and K. A. Hughes. 2001. Male genotype affects female longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55:835-839.
58. Schmoll, T., V. Dietrich, W. Winkel, J. T. Epplen, F. Schurr, and T. Lubjuhn. 2005. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine. Evolution 59:645-657.
59. Tatar, M., and D. E. L. Promislow. 1997. Fitness costs of female reproduction. Evolution 51:1323-1326.
60. Torres-Vila, L. M., and M. D. Jennions. 2005. Male mating history and female fecundity in the Lepidoptera: do male virgins make better partners? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57:318-326.
61. Tregenza, T., and N. Wedell. 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726-1730.
62. Tregenza, T., N. Wedell, D. J. Hosken, and P. I. Ward. 2003. Maternal effects on offspring depend on female mating pattern and offspring environment in yellow dung flies. Evolution 57:297-304.
63. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 139-179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago.
64. Wolfner, M. F. 2002. The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity 88:85-93.
65. Zeh, J. A., and D. W. Zeh. 2003. Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109:929-950.