Rethinking in vitro embryo culture: New developments in culture platforms and potential to improve assisted reproductive technologies

Biology of Reproduction

Volumn 86, Issue 3, 2012, Pages

  Smith, Gary D ^a,b   Takayama, Shuichi ^b   Swain, Jason E ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Blastocyst; Dynamic culture; Embryo culture; Microfluidics; Surface coating; Vibration

Indexed keywords

DIMETICONE;

BLASTOCYST; CELL MOTION; CRYOPRESERVATION; CULTURE MEDIUM; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EVAPORATION; FERTILIZATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FLUID FLOW; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MICROENVIRONMENT; MICROFLUIDICS; NIDATION; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE MATURATION; OSMOLALITY; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; TILTING; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; VIBRATION; ANIMAL; CYTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; BLASTOCYST; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; EMBRYO CULTURE TECHNIQUES; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;

EID: 84860621319     PISSN: 00063363     EISSN: 15297268     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.111.095778     Document Type: Short Survey

References (86)

1. Lane M, Gardner DK. Embryo culture medium: which is the best? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21:83-100.
2. Biggers JD, McGinnis LK, Lawitts JA. One-step versus two-step culture of mouse preimplantation embryos: is there a difference? Hum Reprod 2005; 20:3376-3384.
3. Westrom L, Mardh PA, Mecklenburg CV, Hakansson CH. Studies on ciliated epithelia of the human genital tract. II. The mucociliary wave pattern of fallopian tube epithelium. Fertil Steril 1977; 28:955-961.
4. Paltieli Y, Weichselbaum A, Hoffman N, Eibschitz I, Kam Z. Laser scattering instrument for real time in-vivo measurement of ciliary activity in human fallopian tubes. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:1638-1641.
5. Fauci L, Dillon R. Biofluidmechanics of reproduction. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2006; 38:371-394.
6. Swain JE, Smith GD. Advances in embryo culture platforms: novel approaches to improve preimplantation embryo development through modifications of the microenvironment. Hum Reprod Update 2011; 17:541-557.
7. Smith GD, Swain JE, Bormann CL. Microfluidics for gametes, embryos, and embryonic stem cells. Semin Reprod Med 2011; 29:5-14.
8. Reed ML, Woodward BJ, Swain JE. Single or group culture of mammalian embryos: the verdict of the literature. J Reprod Stem Cell Biol 2011; 2:77-87.
9. Bormann C, Swain J, Ni Q, Kennedy R, Smith G. Preimplantation embryo secretome identification. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:s116.
10. Katz-Jaffe MG, Schoolcraft WB, Gardner DK. Analysis of protein expression (secretome) by human and mouse preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril 2006; 86:678-685.
11. Cortezzi SS, Garcia JS, Ferreira CR, Braga DP, Figueira RC, Iaconelli A Jr, Souza GH, Borges E Jr, Eberlin MN. Secretome of the preimplantation human embryo by bottom-up label-free proteomics. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011; 401:1331-1339.
12. Richter KS. The importance of growth factors for preimplantation embryo development and in-vitro culture. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 20:292-304.
13. Thouas GA, Jones GM, Trounson AO. The "GO" system-a novel method of microculture for in vitro development of mouse zygotes to the blastocyst stage. Reproduction 2003; 126:161-169.
14. Lane M, Gardner DK. Effect of incubation volume and embryo density on the development and viability of mouse embryos in vitro. Hum Reprod 1992; 7:558-562.
15. Ali J. Continuous ultra micro drop culture yields higher pregnacy and implantation rates than either large-drop culture or fresh-medium replacement. Clin Embryol (Online) 2004; 7:1-23.
16. Vajta G, Peura TT, Holm P, Paldi A, Greve T, Trounson AO, Callesen H. New method for culture of zona-included or zona-free embryos: the well of the well (WOW) system. Mol Reprod Dev 2000; 55:256-264.
17. Stokes PJ, Abeydeera LR, Leese HJ. Development of porcine embryos in vivo and in vitro; evidence for embryo "cross talk" in vitro. Dev Biol 2005; 284:62-71.
18. Gopichandran N, Leese HJ. The effect of paracrine/autocrine interactions on the in vitro culture of bovine preimplantation embryos. Reproduction 2006; 131:269-277.
19. Somfai T, Inaba Y, Aikawa Y, Ohtake M, Kobayashi S, Akai T, Hattori H, Konishi K, Imai K. Culture of bovine embryos in polyester mesh sections: the effect of pore size and oxygen tension on in vitro development. Reprod Domest Anim 2010; 45:1104-1109.
20. Canseco RS, Sparks AE, Pearson RE, Gwazdauskas FC. Embryo density and medium volume effects on early murine embryo development. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992; 9:454-457.
21. Gardner DK, Lane M, Spitzer A, Batt PA. Enhanced rates of cleavage and development for sheep zygotes cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro in the absence of serum and somatic cells: amino acids, vitamins, and culturing embryos in groups stimulate development. Biol Reprod 1994; 50:390-400.
22. Donnay I, Van Langendonckt A, Auquier P, Grisart B, Vansteenbrugge A, Massip A, Dessy F. Effects of co-culture and embryo number on the in vitro development of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 1997; 47:1549-1561.
23. O'Doherty EM, Wade MG, Hill JL, Boland MP. Effects of culturing bovine oocytes either singly or in groups on development to blastocysts. Theriogenology 1997; 48:161-169.
24. Goovaerts IG, Leroy JL, Van Soom A, De Clercq JB, Andries S, Bols PE. Effect of cumulus cell coculture and oxygen tension on the in vitro developmental competence of bovine zygotes cultured singly. Theriogenology 2009; 71:729-738.
25. Khurana NK, Niemann H. Effects of oocyte quality, oxygen tension, embryo density, cumulus cells and energy substrates on cleavage and morula/blastocyst formation of bovine embryos. Theriogenology 2000; 54:741-756.
26. Fujita T, Umeki H, Shimura H, Kugumiya K, Shiga K. Effect of group culture and embryo-culture conditioned medium on development of bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev 2006; 52:137-142.
27. Spindler RE, Crichton EG, Agca Y, Loskutoff N, Critser J, Gardner DK, Wildt DE. Improved felid embryo development by group culture is maintained with heterospecific companions. Theriogenology 2006; 66:82-92.
28. Spindler RE, Wildt DE. Quality and age of companion felid embryos modulate enhanced development by group culture. Biol Reprod 2002; 66:167-173.
29. Moessner J, Dodson WC. The quality of human embryo growth is improved when embryos are cultured in groups rather than separately. Fertil Steril 1995; 64:1034-1035.
30. Almagor M, Bejar C, Kafka I, Yaffe H. Pregnancy rates after communal growth of preimplantation human embryos in vitro. Fertil Steril 1996; 66:394-397.
31. Rieger D, Schimmel T, Cohen J, Cecchi M. Comparison of GPS and standard dishes for embryo culture: set-up and observation times, and embryo development. Proceedings of the 14th World Congress on In Vitro Fertilization 2007; 141.
32. Ali J, Shahata MA, Al-Natsha SD. Formulation of a protein-free medium for human assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:145-156.
33. Melin J, Lee A, Foygel K, Leong DE, Quake SR, Yao MW. In vitro embryo culture in defined, sub-microliter volumes. Dev Dyn 2009; 238:950-955.
34. Vajta G, Korosi T, Du Y, Nakata K, Ieda S, Kuwayama M, Nagy ZP. The well-of-the-well system: an efficient approach to improve embryo development. Reprod Biomed Online 2008; 17:73-81.
35. Taka M, Iwayama H, Fukui Y. Effect of the well of the well (WOW) system on in vitro culture for porcine embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Reprod Dev 2005; 51:533-537.
36. Hoelker M, Rings F, Lund Q, Ghanem N, Phatsara C, Griese J, Schellander K, Tesfaye D. Effect of the microenvironment and embryo density on developmental characteristics and gene expression profile of bovine preimplantative embryos cultured in vitro. Reproduction 2009; 137:415-425.
37. Sugimura S, Akai T, Somfai T, Hirayama M, Aikawa Y, Ohtake M, Hattori H, Kobayashi S, Hashiyada Y, Konishi K, Imai K. Time-lapse cinematography-compatible polystyrene-based microwell culture system: a novel tool for tracking the development of individual bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 2010; 83:970-978.
38. Krisher RL, Wheeler MB. Towards the use of microfluidics for individual embryo culture. Reprod Fertil Dev 2010; 22:32-39.
39. Villa-Diaz L, Nandivada H, Ding J, Nogueira-de-Souza N, Krebsbach P, O'Shea K, Lahann J, Smith G. Synthetic polymer coatings for long-term growth of human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotechnology 2010; 28:581-583.
40. Booth PJ, Watson TJ, Leese HJ. Prediction of porcine blastocyst formation using morphological, kinetic, and amino acid depletion and appearance criteria determined during the early cleavage of in vitro-produced embryos. Biol Reprod 2007; 77:765-779.
41. Raty S, Walters EM, Davis J, Zeringue H, Beebe DJ, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Wheeler MB. Embryonic development in the mouse is enhanced via microchannel culture. Lab Chip 2004; 4:186-190.
42. Raty S, Davis J, Beebe D, Rodriguez-Zas S, Wheeler M. Culture in microchannels enhances in vitro embryonic development of preimplantation mouse embryos. Theriogenology 2001; 55:241.
43. Beebe D, Wheeler M, Zeringue H, Walters E, Raty S. Microfluidic technology for assisted reproduction. Theriogenology 2002; 57:125-135.
44. Trimarchi JR, Liu L, Smith PJ, Keefe DL. Noninvasive measurement of potassium efflux as an early indicator of cell death in mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 2000; 63:851-857.
45. Trimarchi JR, Liu L, Porterfield DM, Smith PJ, Keefe DL. Oxidative phosphorylation-dependent and-independent oxygen consumption by individual preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol Reprod 2000; 62:1866-1874.
46. Lane M, Hooper K, Gardner DK. Effect of essential amino acids on mouse embryo viability and ammonium production. J Assist Reprod Genet 2001; 18:519-525.
47. Gardner DK, Lane M. Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod 1993; 48:377-385.
48. Lane M, Gardner DK. Increase in postimplantation development of cultured mouse embryos by amino acids and induction of fetal retardation and exencephaly by ammonium ions. J Reprod Fertil 1994; 102:305-312.
49. Lane M, Gardner DK. Ammonium induces aberrant blastocyst differentiation, metabolism, pH regulation, gene expression and subsequently alters fetal development in the mouse. Biol Reprod 2003; 69:1109-1117.
50. Zander DL, Thompson JG, Lane M. Perturbations in mouse embryo development and viability caused by ammonium are more severe after exposure at the cleavage stages. Biol Reprod 2006; 74:288-294.
51. Biggers JD, McGinnis LK, Summers MC. Discrepancies between the effects of glutamine in cultures of preimplantation mouse embryos. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9:70-73.
52. Fukui Y, Lee ES, Araki N. Effect of medium renewal during culture in two different culture systems on development to blastocysts from in vitro produced early bovine embryos. J Anim Sci 1996; 74:2752-2758.
53. Hoppe PC, Pitts S. Fertilization in vitro and development of mouse ova. Biol Reprod 1973; 8:420-426.
54. Isachenko V, Montag M, Isachenko E, van der Ven K, Dorn C, Roesing B, Braun F, Sadek F, van der Ven H. Effective method for in-vitro culture of cryopreserved human ovarian tissue. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13:228-234.
55. Cohen J, Ooms MP, Vreeburg JT. Reduction of fertilizing capacity of epididymal spermatozoa by 5 alpha-steroid reductase inhibitors. Experientia 1981; 37:1031-1032.
56. Zeilmaker GH. Fusion of rat and mouse morulae and formation of chimaeric blastocysts. Nature 1973; 242:115-116.
57. Matsuura K, Hayashi N, Kuroda Y, Takiue C, Hirata R, Takenami M, Aoi Y, Yoshioka N, Habara T, Mukaida T, Naruse K. Improved development of mouse and human embryos using a tilting embryo culture system. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20:358-364.
58. Koike T, Matsuura K, Naruse K, Funahashi H. In-vitro culture with a tilting device in chemically defined media during meiotic maturation and early development improves the quality of blastocysts derived from invitro matured and fertilized porcine oocytes. J Reprod Dev 2010; 56:552-557.
59. Kim MS, Bae CY, Wee G, Han YM, Park JK. A microfluidic in vitro cultivation system for mechanical stimulation of bovine embryos. Electrophoresis 2009; 30:3276-3282.
60. Mizobe Y, Yoshida M, Miyoshi K. Enhancement of cytoplasmic maturation of in vitro-matured pig oocytes by mechanical vibration. J Reprod Dev 2010; 56:285-290.
61. Isachenko E, Maettner R, Isachenko V, Roth S, Kreienberg R, Sterzik K. Mechanical agitation during the in vitro culture of human pre-implantation embryos drastically increases the pregnancy rate. Clin Lab 2010; 56:569-576.
62. Isachenko V, Maettner R, Sterzik K, Strehler E, Kreinberg R, Hancke K, Roth S, Isachenko E. In-vitro culture of human embryos with mechanical micro-vibration increases implantation rates. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 22:536-544.
63. Xie Y, Wang F, Zhong W, Puscheck E, Shen H, Rappolee DA. Shear stress induces preimplantation embryo death that is delayed by the zona pellucida and associated with stress-activated protein kinase-mediated apoptosis. Biol Reprod 2006; 75:45-55.
64. Xie Y, Wang F, Puscheck EE, Rappolee DA. Pipetting causes shear stress and elevation of phosphorylated stress-activated protein kinase/jun kinase in preimplantation embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2007; 74:1287-1294.
65. Hickman D, Beebe D, Rodriguez-Zas S, Wheeler M. Comparison of static and dynamic medium environments for culturing of pre-implantation mouse embryos. Comp Med 2002; 52:122-126.
66. Heo YS, Cabrera LM, Bormann CL, Shah CT, Takayama S, Smith GD. Dynamic microfunnel culture enhances mouse embryo development and pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod 2010; 25:613-622.
67. Lim JM, Reggio BC, Godke RA, Hansel W. Perfusion culture system for bovine embryos: improvement of embryo development by use of bovine oviduct epithelial cells, an antioxidant and polyvinyl alcohol. Reprod Fertil Dev 1997; 9:411-418.
68. Goverde HJ, Peeters RH, Willems PH. The development of a superfusion system for studying intracellular and secretory processes in embryos. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 1994; 30A:819-821.
69. Pruitt JA, Forrest DW, Burghardt RC, Evans JW, Kraemer DC. Viability and ultrastructure of equine embryos following culture in a static or dynamic system. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 1991; 44:405-410.
70. Villa-Diaz LG, Torisawa YS, Uchida T, Ding J, Nogueira-de-Souza NC, O'Shea KS, Takayama S, Smith GD. Microfluidic culture of single human embryonic stem cell colonies. Lab Chip 2009; 9:1749-1755.
71. Chung BG, Flanagan LA, Rhee SW, Schwartz PH, Lee AP, Monuki ES, Jeon NL. Human neural stem cell growth and differentiation in a gradientgenerating microfluidic device. Lab Chip 2005; 5:401-406.
72. Hung PJ, Lee PJ, Sabounchi P, Aghdam N, Lin R, Lee LP. A novel high aspect ratio microfluidic design to provide a stable and uniform microenvironment for cell growth in a high throughput mammalian cell culture array. Lab Chip 2005; 5:44-48.
73. Zhang C, Xing D, Li Y. Micropumps, microvalves, and micromixers within PCR microfluidic chips: advances and trends. Biotechnol Adv 2007; 25:483-514.
74. Pennathur S. Flow control in microfluidics: are the workhorse flows adequate? Lab Chip 2008; 8:383-387.
75. Cho BS, Schuster TG, Zhu X, Chang D, Smith GD, Takayama S. Passively driven integrated microfluidic system for separation of motile sperm. Anal Chem 2003; 75:1671-1675.
76. Schuster TG, Cho B, Keller LM, Takayama S, Smith GD. Isolation of motile spermatozoa from semen samples using microfluidics. Reprod Biomed Online 2003; 7:75-81.
77. Suh RS, Zhu X, Phadke N, Ohl DA, Takayama S, Smith GD. IVF within microfluidic channels requires lower total numbers and lower concentrations of sperm. Hum Reprod 2006; 21:477-483.
78. Han C, Zhang Q, Ma R, Xie L, Qiu T, Wang L, Mitchelson K, Wang J, Huang G, Qiao J, Cheng J. Integration of single oocyte trapping, in vitro fertilization and embryo culture in a microwell-structured microfluidic device. Lab Chip 2010; 10:2848-2854.
79. Ma R, Xie L, Han C, Su K, Qiu T, Wang L, Huang G, Xing W, Qiao J, Wang J, Cheng J. In vitro fertilization on a single-oocyte positioning system integrated with motile sperm selection and early embryo development. Anal Chem 2011; 83:2964-2970.
80. Clark SG, Haubert K, Beebe DJ, Ferguson CE, Wheeler MB. Reduction of polyspermic penetration using biomimetic microfluidic technology during in vitro fertilization. Lab Chip 2005; 5:1229-1232.
81. Davis J, Raty S, Eddington D, Wheeler M, Glasgow I, Beebe D. Development of microfluidic systems for the culture of mammalian embryos. First International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on Microtechnology in Medicine and Biology, Lyon, France, October 12-14, 2000.
82. Heo YS, Cabrera LM, Song JW, Futai N, Tung YC, Smith GD, Takayama S. Characterization and resolution of evaporation-mediated osmolality shifts that constrain microfluidic cell culture in poly(dimethylsiloxane) devices. Anal Chem 2007; 79:1126-1134.
83. Gu W, Zhu X, Futai N, Cho BS, Takayama S. Computerized microfluidic cell culture using elastomeric channels and Braille displays. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101:15861-15866.
84. Bormann C, Cabrera L, Heo Y, Takayama S, Smith G. Dynamic microfluidic embryo dynamic microfluidic embryo culture enhances blastocyst development of murine and bovine embryos. Proceedings from the 14th World Congress on in Vitro Fertilization 2007; 84.
85. Mizuno J, Ostrovidov S, Nakamura H, Akaishi K, Inui H, Sakai Y, Fujii T, Anzai K, Watanabe A. Human ART on chip: development of microfluidic device for IVF and IVC. Hum Reprod 2007; 22:P432.
86. Mizuno J, Ostrovidov S, Sakai Y, Fujii T, Nakamura H, Inui H. Human ART on chip: improved human blastocyst development and quality with IVF-chip. Fertil Steril 2007; 88:S101.