The impact of online lecture recordings on student performance

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 199-213

  Williams, Andrew ^a   Birch, Elisa ^a   Hancock, Phil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860538652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.869     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Anderson, G., Benjamin, D. & Fuss, M. A. (1994). The determinants of success in university introductory economics courses. Journal of Economic Education, 25(2), 99-120. http://www.jstor.org/pss/1183277
2. Bell, T., Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B. & Vargo, J. (2001). Flexible delivery damaging to learning? Lessons from the Canterbury Digital Lectures Project. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications - ED-MEDIA (pp. 117-122). AACE. [verified 18 Feb 2012] http://www.cosc.canterbury.ac.nz/andrew.cockburn/papers/edmedia.pdf,http://www.editlib.org/p/8347
3. Bennett, E. & Maniar, N. (2007). Are videoed lectures an effective teaching tool? [verified 18 Feb 2012] http://stream.port.ac.uk/papers/Are%20videoed%20lectures%20an%20effective%20teaching%20tool.pdf
4. Birch, E. R. & Miller, P. W. (2004). The determinants of students' tertiary academic success. In Productivity Commission Conference on Quantitative Tools for Microeconomic Policy Analysis: Conference Proceedings. Productivity Commission, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 45-80. [verified 18 Feb 2012] http://msc.uwa.edu.au/?f=148836
5. Birch, E. R. & Miller, P. W. (2007). The influence of type of high school attended on university performance. Australian Economic Papers, 46(1), 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2007.00302.x
6. Birch, E. R. & Williams, A. (2010). The importance of prior knowledge of the subject studied in explaining the academic outcomes of first-year commerce students. Quantitative Analysis of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Forum, Melbourne, Australia, February 2010.
7. Brotherton, J. A. & Abowd, G. D. (2004). Lessons learned from eClass: Assessing automated capture and access in the classroom. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 11(2), 121-155. ACM Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1005361.1005362
8. Chiu, C., Lee, G. & Yang, J. (2006). A comparative study of post-class lecture video viewing. In Proceedings of the 5th IASTED international Conference on Web-Based Education (pp. 126-130). ACTA Press.
9. Day, J. & Foley, J. (2006). Evaluating web lectures: A case study from HCI. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '06), Montreal, Canada, 22-27 April. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125493
10. Dobson, I. & Skuja, E. (2005). Secondary schooling, tertiary entrance ranks and university performance. People and Place, 13(1), 53-62.
11. Figlio, D., Rush, M. & Yin, L. (2010). Is it live or is it Internet? Experimental estimates of the effects of online instruction on student learning. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16089, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, USA. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16089
12. Gysbers, V., Johnston, J., Hancock, D. & Denyer, G. (2011). Why do students still bother coming to lectures, when everything is available online? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 19(2), 20-36. http://escholarship.usyd.edu.au/journals/index.php/CAL/article/viewFile/4887/5979
13. Larkin, H. (2010). "But they won't come to lectures ...": The impact of audio recorded lectures on student experience and attendance. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 238-249. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/larkin.html
14. McNulty, J. A., Hoyt, A., Chandrasekhar, A. J., Espiritu, B., Gruener, G., Price, R. Jr. & Naheedy, R. (2011). A three-year study of lecture multimedia utilization in the medical curriculum: Associations with performances in the basic sciences. Journal of the International Association of Medical Science Educators, 21(1). http://www.iamse.org/artman/publish/article_586.shtml
15. Preston, G., Phillips, R., Gosper, M., McNeill, M., Woo, K. & Green, D. (2010). Web-based lecture technologies: Highlighting the changing nature of teaching and learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 717-728. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/preston.html
16. Skene, J., Cluett, L. & Hogan, J. (2007). Engaging Gen Y students at university: What web tools do they have, how do they use them and what do they want? Proceedings First Year in Higher Education Conference, 2007. http://www.fyhe.com.au/past_papers/papers07/final_papers/pdfs/2b.pdf
17. Taplin, R. H., Low, L. H. & Brown, A. (2011). Students' satisfaction and valuation of web-based lecture recording technologies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(2), 175-191. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/taplin.html
18. Von Konsky, B. R., Ivins, J. & Gribble, S. J. (2009). Lecture attendance and web based lecture technologies: A comparison of student perceptions and usage patterns. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 581-595. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/vonkonsky.html
19. Wieling, M. B. & Hofman, W.H.A. (2010). The impact of online video lecture recordings and automated feedback on student performance. Computers & Education, 54(4), 992-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.002