Asymmetry and symmetry in the beauty of human faces

Symmetry

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 136-149

  Zaidel, Dahlia W ^a   Hessamian, Marjan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Art; Attractiveness; Biology; Brain; Courtship displays; Mate selection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860466953     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20738994     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/sym2010136     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Kosso, P., Symmetry arguments in physics. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. A 1999, 30, 479-492.
2. Engler, G. Aesthetics in science and art. Br. J. Aesthetics 1990, 30, 24-34.
3. Zee, A. Fearful symmetry: The search for beauty in modern physics. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2007.
4. Engler, G. Einstein, his theories, and his aesthetic considerations. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 2005, 19, 21-30.
5. Muller, A. Chemistry: The beauty of symmetry. Science 2003, 300, 749-750.
6. Gould, J.L.; Gould, C.G. Sexual selection. Scientific American Library: New York, 1989.
7. Cronin, H. The ant and the peacock. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992.
8. Jacobsen, T.; Schubotz, R.I.; Hofel, L.; Y., V.C.D. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage 2006, 29, 276-285.
9. Saito, Y. The Japanese aesthetics of imperfection and insufficiency. J. Aesthet. Art Critic. 1997, 55, 377-385.
10. Wicks, R. The idealization of contingency in traditional Japanese aesthetics. J. Aesthet. Edu. 2005, 39, 88-101.
11. Juniper, A., Wabi Sabi: The Japanese art of impermanence. Tuttle Publishing: Tokyo, Japan, 2003.
12. Marra, M.F. A history of modern Japanese aesthetics. University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 2001.
13. Grammer, K.; Thornhill, R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: The role of symmetry and averageness. J. Com. Psychol. 1994, 108, 233-242.
14. Zaidel, D.W.; Chen, A.C.; German, C. She is not a beauty even when she smiles: possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia 1995, 33, 649-655.
15. Zaidel, D.W.; Deblieck, C. Attractiveness of natural faces compared to computer constructed perfectly symmetrical faces. Int. J. Neurosci. 2007, 117, 423-431.
16. Babcock, L.E. Asymmetry in the fossil record. Euro. Rev. 2005, 13, 135-143.
17. Palmer, A.R. Waltzing with asymmetry. Biol. Sci. 1996, 46, 518-532.
18. Stevens, M.; Castor-Perry, S.A.; Price, J.R.F. The protective value of conspicuous signals is not impaired by shape, size, or position asymmetry. Behav. Ecol. 2008, 20, 96-102.
19. Takahashi, M.; Arita, H.; Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M.; Hasegawa, T. Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains. Anim. Behav. 2008, 75, 1209-1219.
20. Dufour, K.W.; Weatherhead, P.J. Reproductive consequences of bilateral asymmetry for individual male red-winged blackbirds. Behav. Ecol. 1998, 9, 232-242.
21. Midgley, J.J.; Johnson, S.D. Some pollinators do not prefer symmetrically marked or shaped daisy (Asteraceae) flowers. Evol. Ecol. 1998, 12, 123-126.
22. Neville, A.C. Animal asymmetry. Edward Arnold: London, UK, 1976.
23. Sperry, R.W. Lateral specialization in the surgically separated hemispheres. In Neurosciences Third Study Program, Schmitt, F.; Worden, F., Eds. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974; Vol. 3.
24. Zaidel, D.W. Different concepts and meaning systems in the left and right hemispheres. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 2000, 40, 1-21.
25. Serrien, D.J.; Ivry, R.B.; Swinnen, S.P. Dynamics of hemispheric specialization and integration in the context of motor control. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006, 7, 160-167.
26. Zilhao, J. The emergence of ornaments and art: An archaeological perspective on the origins of "behavioral modernity". J. Archaeol. Res. 2007, 15, 1-54.
27. Mace, R. On becoming modern. Science 2009, 324, 1280-1281.
28. Zaidel, D.W. Art and brain: insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution. J. Anat. 2010, 216, 20-27.
29. Farkas, L.G.; Posnick, J.C.; Hreczko, T.M. Growth patterns of the face: a morphometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. 1992, 29, 308-315.
30. Ferrario, V. F.; Sforza, C.; Pogio, C. E.; Tartaglia, G. Distance from symmetry: a threedimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1994, 52, 1126-1132.
31. Ferrario, V.F.; Sforza, C.; Miani, A., Jr.; Serrao, G. A three-dimensional evaluation of human facial asymmetry. J. Anat. 1995, 186 (Pt 1), 103-110.
32. Ferrario, V.F.; Sforza, C.; Ciusa, V.; Dellavia, C.; Tartaglia, G.M. The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2001, 59, 382-388.
33. Ferrario, V.F.; Sforza, C.; Dellavia, C.; Tartaglia, G.M.; Colombo, A.; Caru, A. A quantitative three-dimensional assessment of soft tissue facial asymmetry of cleft lip and palate adult patients. J. Craniofac. Surg. 2003, 14, 739-746.
34. Drummond, P.D.; Mirco, N. Staring at one side of the face increases blood flow on that side of the face. Psychophysiol. 2004, 41, 281-287.
35. Benedicic, M.; Dolenk, V.V.; Stefanovska, A.; Bosnjak, R. Left-right asymmetry of the facial microvascular control. Clin. Auton. Res. 2006, 16, 58-60.
36. Sackheim, H.A.; Weiman, A.L.; Forman, B.D. Asymmetry of the face at rest: Size, area and emotional expression. Cortex 1984, 20, 165-178.
37. Dopson, W.G.; Beckwith, B.E.; Tucker, D.M.; Bullard-Bates, P.C. Asymmetry of facial expression in spontaneous emotion. Cortex 1984, 20, 243-251.
38. Borod, J.C.; Haywood, C.S.; Koff, E. Neuropsychological aspects of facial asymmetry during emotional expression: a review of the normal adult literature. Neuropsych. Rev. 1997, 7, 41-60.
39. Skvarilova, B. Facial asymmetry: an X-ray study. Acta Chir. Plast. 1994, 36, 89-91.
40. Peck, S.; Peck, L.; Kataia, M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod. 1991, 61, 43-48.
41. Wylie, D.R.; Goodale, M.A. Left sided oral asymmetries in spontaneous but not posed smiles. Neuropsychologia 1988, 26, 823-832.
42. Jordan, T.R.; Thomas, S.M. Hemiface contributions to hemispheric dominance in visual speech perception. Neuropsychology 2007, 21, 721-731.
43. Nicholls, M.E.; Searle, D.A. Asymmetries for the visual expression and perception of speech. Brain Lang. 2006, 97, 322-331.
44. Zaidel, D.W.; Cohen, J.A. The face, beauty, and symmetry: perceiving asymmetry in beautiful faces. Int. J. Neurosci. 2005, 115, 1165-1173.
45. Wagemans, J. Characteristics and models of human symmetry detection. Trends Cogn. Sci. 1997, 1, 346-352.
46. Swaddle, J. P. Visual signaling by asymmetry: a review of perceptual processes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 1999, 354, 1383-1393.
47. Enquist, M.; Arak, A. Symmetry, beauty, and evolution. Nature 1994, 372, 169-172.
48. Johnstone, R.A. Female preference for symmetrical males as a by-product of selection for mate recognition. Nature 1994, 372, 172-175.
49. Reis, V.A.; Zaidel, D.W. Functional asymmetry in the human face: perception of health in the left and right sides of the face. Laterality 2001, 6, 225-231.
50. Zaidel, D.W.; Aarde, S.M.; Baig, K. Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces. Brain Cogn. 2005, 57, 261-263.
51. Little, A.C.; Jones, B.C. Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 2003, 270, 1759-1763.
52. Rhodes, G.; Proffitt, F.; Grady, J.M.; Sumich, A. Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1998, 5, 659-669.
53. Knowner, R. Facial asymmetry and attractiveness judgment in developmental perspective. J. Exp. Psychol. 1996, 22, 662-675.
54. Samuels, C. A.; Butterworth, G.; Roberts, T.; Graupner, L.; Hole, G. Facial aesthetics: Babies prefer attractiveness to symmetry. Perception 1994, 23, 823-831.
55. Scheib, J.E.; Gangestad, S.W.; Thornhill, R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 1999, 266, 1913-1917.
56. Springer, I.N.; Wannicke, B.; Warnke, P.H.; Zernial, O.; Wiltfang, J.; Russo, P.A.J.; Terheyden, H.; Reinhardt, A.; Wolfart, S. Visual attractiveness: Visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann. Plast. Surg. 2007, 59, 156-162.
57. Chen, A.C.; German, C.; Zaidel, D.W. Brain asymmetry and facial attractiveness: beauty is not simply in the eye of the beholder. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35, 471-476.
58. Moller, A.P. Bumblebee preference for symmetrical flowers. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 2288-2292.
59. Langlois, J.H.; Roggman, L.A. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol. Sci. 1990, 1, 115-121.
60. Swaddle, J.P.; Cuthill, J.C. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 1995, 261, 111-116.
61. Ritchie, M.G. The shape of female mating preferences. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 14628-14631.
62. Ellison, P.T. Beauty: In the gonads of the beholder - and the beheld. Horm. Behav. 2008, 53, 11-13.
63. Penton-Voak, I.S.; Little, A.C.; Jones, B.C.; Burt, D.M.; Tiddeman, B.P.; Perrett, D.I. Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). J. Comp. Psychol. 2003, 117, 264-271.
64. Swaddle, J.P.; Reierson, G.W. Testosterone increases perceived dominance but not attractiveness in human males. Pro. Biol. Sci. 2002, 22, 2285-2289.
65. Welling, L.L.; Jones, B.C.; DeBruine, L.M.; Conway, C.A.; Law Smith, M.J.; Little, A.C.; Feinberg, D.R.; Sharp, M.A.; Al-Dujaili, E.A. Raised salivary testosterone in women is associated with increased attraction to masculine faces. Horm. Behav. 2007, 52, 156-161.
66. Madden, J. Sex, bowers and brains. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 2001, 268, 833-838.
67. Keagy, J.; Savard, J.-F.; Borgia, G. Male satin bowerbird problem-solving ability predicts mating success. Anim. Behav. 2009, 100, 1-9.
68. Cuthill, I.C.; Hiby, E.; Lloyd, E. The predation costs of symmetrical cryptic coloration. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 2006, 273, 1267-1271.
69. Hauser, M.D.; Akre, K. Asymmetries in the timing of facial and vocal expressions in rhesus monkeys: Implications for hemispheric specialization. Anim. Behav. 2001, 61, 391-408.
70. Weiss, D., Ghazanfar, A., Miller, C.T.; Hauser, M.D. Specialized processing of primate facial and vocal expressions: Evidence for cerebral asymmetries. In Cerebral vertebrate lateralization, Andrews, L.R.R., Ed. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002.
71. Hook-Costigan, M.A.; Rogers, L.J. Lateralised use of the mouth in production of vocalizations by marmosets. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36, 1265-1273.
72. Fernandez-Cariba, S.; Loeches, A.; Morcillo, A.; Hopkins, W.D. Asymmetry in facial expression of emotions by chimpanzees. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40, 1523-1533.
73. Vallortigara, G.; Rogers, L.J. Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav. Brain Sci. 2005, 28, 575-589.
74. Buss, D.M. Strategies of human mating. Psychol. Topics 2006, 15, 239-260.
75. Rhodes, G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2006, 57, 199-226.
76. Yorzinski, J.L.; Platt, M.L. Same-sex gaze attraction influences mate-choice copying in humans. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9115.
77. Little, A.C.; Jones, B.C.; Waitt, C.; Tiddman, B.P.; Feinberg, D.R.; Perrett, D.I.; Apicella, C.L.; Marlowe, F.W. Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. Plos One 2008, 7, e2106.
78. Fink, B.; Neave, N.; Manning, J.T.; Grammer, K. Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Pers. Individ. Dif. 2006, 41, 491-499.
79. Jones, B.C.; DeBruine, L.M.; Little, A.C. The role of symmetry in attraction to average faces. Percept. Psychophys. 2007, 69, 1273-1277.
80. Zaidel, D.W. Brain and art: Neuro-clues from intersection of disciplines. In Neuroaesthetics, Skov, M.; Vartanian, O., Eds. Baywood: Amityville, NY, USA, 2009.