Mid-stream vs. first-voided urine collection by using automated analyzers for particle examination in healthy subjects: An Italian multicenter study

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 679-684

  Manoni, Fabio ^a   Gessoni, Gianluca ^b   Alessio, Maria Grazia ^c   Caleffi, Alberta ^d   Saccani, Graziella ^e   Silvestri, Maria Grazia ^f   Poz, Donatella ^g   Ercolin, Mauro ^a   Tinello, Agostino ^a   Valverde, Sara ^b   Ottomano, Cosimo ^c   Lippi, Giuseppe ^d  

^a Servizio di Medicina di Laboratorio   (Italy)

^b Ospedale di Chioggia   (Italy)

^c OSPEDALI RIUNITI   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PARMA   (Italy)

^e Ospedale di Bussolengo   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^g Servizio di Medicina di Laboratorio   (Italy)

Author keywords

automation; first voided; mid stream; particle quantification; pre analytical; urinalysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; CELL COUNT; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; EPITHELIUM CELL; ERYTHROCYTE; FEMALE; FIRST VOIDED URINE COLLECTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ITALY; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; LEUKOCYTE; MALE; MICTURITION; MID STREAM URINE COLLECTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; URINALYSIS; URODYNAMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AUTOMATION; FEMALE; HEALTH; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SOLUBILITY; URINALYSIS; URINATION; URINE SPECIMEN COLLECTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84860459113     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: 14374331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/cclm.2011.823     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kouri T, Fogazzi G, Gant V, Hallander H, Hofmann W, Guder W. European Urinalysis Guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2000;60(Suppl 231):1-96.
2. NCCLS. Urinalysis and Collection, Transportation, and preservation of Urine Specimens; approved Guideline, 2nd ed. GP16-A3 2009;29.
3. Manoni F, Caleffi A, Gessoni G, Alessio M, Lippi G, Valverde S, et al. L'esame delle urine chimico morfologico e colturale: proposta di linee guida per una procedura standardizzata della fase pre-analitica. Biochim Clin 2011;35:131-9.
4. Kirkpatrick J, Alexander J, Cain R Recovering urine from diapers: are test results accurate ? MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 1997;22:96-102. (Pubitemid 127458332)
5. Belmin J, Hervias Y, Avellano E, Oudart O, Durand I. Reliability of sampling urine from disposable diapers in elderly incontinent women. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:1182-6. (Pubitemid 23324866)
6. Koivula T, Grönroos P, G ä vert J, Icen A, Irjala K, Penttil ä I, et al. Basic urinalysis and urine culture: fi nnish recommendations from the working group on clean midstream specimens. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1990;200:26-33. (Pubitemid 20215340)
7. Lalla M, Koivula T, Blomberg H, Gr ø nroos P, G ä vert J, Icen A, et al. Finnish recommendation for methods used in urinalysis: results for fi ve-year period. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1990;200:34-8.
8. Lippi G, Guidi GC, Mattiuzzi C, Plebani M. Preanalytical variability: the dark side of the moon in laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:358-65.
9. Favaloro EJ, Lippi G, Adcock DM Preanalytical and postanalytical variables: the leading causes of diagnostic error in hemostasis ? Semin Thromb Hemost 2008;34:612-34.
10. Lippi G, Ippolito L, Fontana R. Prevalence of hemolytic specimens referred for arterial blood gas analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:931-2.
11. Lippi G, Chance JJ, Church S, Dazzi P, Fontana R, Giavarina D, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1113-26.
12. Coppens A, Speechaert M, Delanghe J. The pre-analytical challenges of routine urinalysis. Acta Med Belg 2010;65:182-188.
13. Morimoto N, Yanai H, Shukuya K, Hitoshi C, Kobayashi K, Matsunoi K. Effects of midstream collection and the menstrual cycle on urine particles and dipstick urinalysis among healthy females. Clin Chem 2003;49:188-90. (Pubitemid 36078575)
14. Morimoto M, Yanai H, Matsuno K. Morphologic changes in urine particles during the menstrual cycle. Clin Chem 2005;61:1081-2. (Pubitemid 40740911)
15. Langlois M, Delanghe J, Steayaert R, Evearet K, DeBuyzere M. Automated fl ow cytometry compared with automated dipstick reader for urinalysis. Clin Chem 1999;45:118-22. (Pubitemid 29036394)
16. Regeniter A, Haenni V, Risch L, Köchli H, Colombo J, Frebi R, et al. Urine analysis performed by fl ow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological fi ndings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results a multicenter study. Clin Nephrol 2001;55:384-92. (Pubitemid 32427921)
17. Ben-Ezra J, Bork L, McPherson R. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer. Clin Chem 1998;44:92-5. (Pubitemid 28042472)
18. Terachi M, NishidaY, Funahashi J, Kazikoe K, Toichi M, Shimada M, et al. Evaluation study for reference intervals of UF-1000i using urine specimens from school children. Sysmex J Intern 2009;19:1-4.
19. Terajima S, Yokomizo H, Yagi A, Miura M, Amano C. Evaluation study for reference intervals of urine sediments using UF-1000i in medical checkup population. Sysmex J Int 2009;19:82-6.
20. Alves L, Ballester F, Camps J, Joven J. Preliminary evaluation of the Iris iQ 200 automated urine analyser. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005;43:967-70. (Pubitemid 41461149)
21. Budak YU, Huysal K. Comparison of three automated systems for urine chemistry and sediment analysis in routine laboratory practice. Clin Lab 2011;57:47-52.
22. Kouri T, Vuotari L, Pohjavaara S, Laippala P. Preservation of urine for fl ow cytometry and visual microscopic testing. Clin Chem 2002;48:900-5. (Pubitemid 34587590)
23. Manoni F, Valverde S, Caleffi A, Alessio M, Silvestri M, De Rosa M, et al. Gessoni stability of common analytes and urine particles stored at room temperature before automated analysis. RIMel- IJLM 2008;4:192-8.
24. Wang J, Zhang Y, Xu D, Shao W, Lu Y. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:577-82.
25. Jolkkonen S, Paattiniemi E, Karpanoja P, Sarkkonen H. Screening of urine samples by fl ow cytometry reduces the need for culture. J Clin Microbiol 2010;48:3117-21.
26. Okada H, Sakai Y, Miyazaky S, Arakawa S, Hamaguchi Y, Kamidono S. Detection of signifi cant bacteriuria by automated urinalysis using fl ow citometry. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:2870-2. (Pubitemid 30640564)
27. Manoni F, Fornasiero L, Ercolin M, Tinello A, Ferrian M, Hoffer P, et al. Cut off values for bacteria and leukocytes for urine fl ow cytometer Sysmex UF-1000i in urinary tract infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009;65:103-7.
28. Ottiger C, Huber AR. Quantitative urine particle analysis: integrative approach for the optimal combination of automation with UF-100 and microscopic review with KOVA cell chamber. Clin Chem 2003;49:617-23. (Pubitemid 36379528)
29. Sutheesophon K, Wiwanitkit V, Boonchalermvichian C, Charuruks N. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer and comparative study with JCCLS reference method. J Med Assoc Thai 2002;85(Suppl 1):S246-52.
30. Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated fl ow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture). Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:753-64. (Pubitemid 29423992)
31. Chien TI, Kao JT, Liu HL, Lin PC, Hong JS, Hsieh HP, et al. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy. Clin Chim Acta 2007;384:28-34.
32. Manoni F, Tinello A, Fornasiero L, Hoffer P, Temporin V, Valverde S, et al. Urine particle evaluation: a comparison between the UF-1000i and quantitative microscopy. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1107-11.
33. Zaman Z, Fogazzi GB, Garigali G, Croci MD, Bayer G, Kránicz T. Urine sediment analysis: analytical and diagnostic performance of sediMAX-a new automated microscopy image-based urine sediment analyser. Clin Chim Acta 2010;411:147-54.
34. Van den Broek D, Keularts IM, Wielders JP, Kraaijenhagen RJ. Benefi ts of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyser in routine urinalysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1635-40.
35. Delanghe J, Kouri T, Huber A, Hannemann-Pohl K, Guder W, Lun A, et al. The role of automated urine particle fl ow cytometry in clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta 2000;301:1-18.
36. Shayanfar N, Tobler U, von Eckardstein A, Bestmann L. Automated urinalysis: fi rst experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 fl ow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:1251-6. (Pubitemid 47396260)
37. Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, et al. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Clin Chim Acta 2005;358:167-74. (Pubitemid 40966645)