Evaluation of the sysmex UF-1000i for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 577-582

  Wang, Jie ^a   Zhang, Ying ^b   Xu, DongWen ^a   Shao, Weijun ^a   Lu, Yuan ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SYSMEX CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Flow cytometry; Sysmex UF 1000i; Urinary sediment examination; Urinary tract infection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; CONTAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EPITHELIUM CELL; ERYTHROCYTE; GRAM NEGATIVE BACTERIUM; GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIUM; HUMAN; LEUKOCYTE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE; URINALYSIS; URINARY CAST; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; ERYTHROCYTE COUNT; FLOW CYTOMETRY; INSTRUMENTATION; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; METHODOLOGY;

AUTOMATION, LABORATORY; ERYTHROCYTE COUNT; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMANS; LEUKOCYTE COUNT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECIMEN HANDLING; URINALYSIS; URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS;

EID: 77950504099     PISSN: 00029173     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1309/AJCP1GT2JXOCQBCZ     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. Am J Med. 2002;113:5-13. (Pubitemid 34756640)
2. Juthani-Mehta M, Tinetti M, Perrelli E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of criteria for urinary tract infection in a cohort of nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1072-1077. (Pubitemid 47024612)
3. Collins CH, Lyne PM. Microbiological Methods. 5th ed. London, England: Butterworths; 1985:128-134.
4. Manoni F, Valverde S, Antico F. Field evaluation of a second-generation cytometer UF-100 in diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections in adult patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;10:662-668. (Pubitemid 35277122)
5. Ozdem S, Bayraktar T, Oktay C, et al. The prevalence of asymptomatic pyuria in diabetic patients: comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer with Fuchs-Rosenthal hemacytometer. Clin Biochem. 2006;39:873-878. (Pubitemid 44344693)
6. Zaman Z, Roggeman S, Verhaegen J. Unsatisfactory performance of flow cytometer UF-100 and urine strips in predicting outcome of urine cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4169-4171. (Pubitemid 33029803)
7. Van Dilla MA, Langlois RG, Pinkel D, et al. Bacterial characterization by flow cytometry. Science. 1983;220:620-622.
8. DeKeijzer MH, Brandts RW. Flow cytometry and the urine laboratory: field evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100. Sysmex J Int. 1997;7:1-7.
9. Fenili D, Pirovano B. The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100). Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998;36:909-917. (Pubitemid 29010100)
10. Kouri TT, Kähkönen U, Malminiemi K, et al. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;112:25-35. (Pubitemid 30214732)
11. Lou Z, Hu X, Jiang Y. Clinical significance of the use of UF-100 urine analyzer for the urinary tract infection screening. Lab Med. 2004;19:54-56.
12. Ye Y, Wang M, Shen Z. National Clinical Examination Procedures. 3rd ed. Beijing, China: Medical Secretary, Ministry of Health, People's Republic of China; 2006:744.
13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Urinalysis and Collection, Transportation, and Preservation of Urine Specimens; Approved guideline. Villanova, PA: NCCLS; 1995:51-69. NCCLS Document GP-16A.
14. Grosso S, Bruschetta G, De Rosa R, et al. Improving the efficiency and efficacy of pre-analytical and analytical workflow of urine cultures with urinary flow cytometry. New Microbiol. 2008;31:501-505.
15. Itokoki I. Activity report of the committee of urine examination standardization. J Jap Clin Exam Stand Assn. 2005;20:18-20.
16. Yerushalmy J, Palmer CE. On the methodology of investigations of etiologic factors in chronic diseases. J Chronic Dis. 1959;108:27-40.
17. Shayanfar N, Tobler U, von Eckardstein A, et al. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:1251-1256. (Pubitemid 47396260)
18. Simerville JA, Maxted WC, Pahira JJ. Urinalysis: a comprehensive review. Am Fam Phys. 2005;71:1153-1162.
19. Winstock GB. Manufacturing fault causes a false negative for haematuria using Makromed m81 urinalysis test strips: a case report. Med Sci Law. 2009;49:56-59.
20. Penders J, Fiers T, Dhondt AM, et al. Automated flow cytometry analysis of peritoneal dialysis fluid. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:463-468. (Pubitemid 38196000)
21. Penders J, Fiers T, Everaert K, et al. Diagnostic performance of combined specific urinary proteins and urinary flow cytometry in urinary tract pathology. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:499-504. (Pubitemid 46632211)
22. Nanos NE, Delanghe JR. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-1000i for use in cerebrospinal fluid analysis. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;392:30-33.
23. Cong Y. Proposal for the urine sediment examination standardization. Chin J Lab Med. 2002;25:249-250.
24. ECLM (European Confederation of Laboratory Medicine) European Urinalysis Group. European urinalysis guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2000;20:231.
25. Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagnosis. Clin Chem Lab. 1999;37:753-764.
26. Gessoni G, Valverde S, Maturi P, et al. Cytometry in the diagnosis of acute urinary tract infections: one year's experience. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2004;64:77-80. (Pubitemid 38283213)