Erratum: Automated urinalysis: First experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting (Clinical Chemical and Laboratory Medicine (2007) 45, 9 (1251-1256) DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.503);Automated urinalysis: First experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 1251-1256

  Shayanfar, Noushin ^a   Tobler, Ulrich ^a   Von Eckardstein, Arnold ^a   Bestmann, Lukas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Automated analyzers; Automated urine examination; Flow cytometry; Imaging system; Urinalysis; Urine sediment

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERYTHROCYTE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SCREENING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; URINALYSIS; URINE SEDIMENT;

TRICHOMONAS;

EID: 34548565908     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: 14374331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.510     Document Type: Erratum

References (37)

1. Wuthrich RP, Serra A. [The red urine]. Ther Umsch 2006;63:595-600.
2. Huussen J, Koene RA, Hilbrands LB. The (fixed) urinary sediment, a simple and useful diagnostic tool in patients with haematuria. Neth J Med 2004;62:4-9.
3. Ono Y, Sugimoto K, Goto M, Kimura M, Kasai T, Shoji M, et al. [Hematuria and acanthocyturia in patients with diabetes]. Rinsho Byori 2005;53:993-8.
4. European Urinalysis Guidelines. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 2000;231:1-86.
5. Winkel P, Statland BE, Jorgensen K. Urine microscopy, an ill-defined method, examined by a multifactorial technique. Clin Chem 1974;20:436-9.
6. Carlson DA, Statland BE. Automated urinalysis. Clin Lab Med 1988;8:449-61.
7. Urinalysis and collection, transportation and preservation of urine specimens; approved guideline: NCCLS document GP 16-A. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, 1995.
8. Alves L, Ballester F, Camps J, Joven J. Preliminary evaluation of the Iris IQ 200 automated urine analyser. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005;43:967-70.
9. Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, et al. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Clin Chim Acta 2005;358:167-74.
10. Okada H, Sakai Y, Kawabata G, Fujisawa M, Arakawa S, Hamaguchi Y, et al. Automated urinalysis. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-50. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;115:605-10.
11. Hannemann-Pohl K, Kampf SC. Automation of urine sediment examination: a comparison of the Sysmex UF-100 automated flow cytometer with routine manual diagno sis (microscopy, test strips, and bacterial culture). Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:753-64.
12. Thiel G. Examination of the urine in general practice. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1977;23:689-702.
13. Shaw ST Jr, Poon SY, Wong ET. "Routine urinalysis". Is the dipstick enough? J Am Med Assoc 1985;253:1596-600.
14. Laine P, Toivonen E, Eklund K, Hohenthal U, Siren S, Maki T. Rapid dipstick urinalysis in the internal medicine clinic: what is missed? J Intern Med 1997;242:271-3.
15. Deville WL, Yzermans JC, van Duijn NP, Bezemer PD, van der Windt DA, Bouter LM. The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMC Urol 2004;4:4.
16. Gangaram R, Ojwang PJ, Moodley J, Maharaj D. The accuracy of urine dipsticks as a screening test for proteinuria in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Hypertens Pregnancy 2005;24:117-23.
17. Lun A, Ziebig R, Priem F, Filler G, Sinha P. Routine work-flow for use of urine strips and urine flow cytometer UF-100 in the hospital laboratory. Clin Chem 1999;45:1305-7.
18. Regeniter A, Haenni V, Risch L, Kochli HP, Colombo JP, Frei R, et al. Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results - a multicenter study. Clin Nephrol 2001;55:384-92.
19. Deindoerfer FH, Gangwer JR, Laird CW, Ringold RR. "The Yellow IRIS" urinalysis workstation - the first commercial application of "automated intelligent microscopy". Clin Chem 1985;31:1491-9.
20. Wargotz ES, Hyde JE, Karcher DS, Hitlan JP, Wilkinson DS. Urine sediment analysis by the Yellow IRIS automated urinalysis workstation. Am J Clin Pathol 1987;88:746-8.
21. Yasui Y, Tatsumi N, Koezuka T, Okamura M, Yamagami S. Comparison of three methods for analysis of urinary sediments. Osaka City Med J 1996;42:77-92.
22. Kouri TT, Kahkonen U, Malminiemi K, Vuento R, Rowan RM. Evaluation of Sysmex UF-100 urine flow cytometer vs chamber counting of supravitally stained specimens and conventional bacterial cultures. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;112:25-35.
23. Toffaletti J, Dotson MA, Shearman P, Koontz A. Comparison of 2 automated systems for urine chemistry and urine sediment analysis. Lab Hematol 1999;5:123-9.
24. Roggeman S, Zaman Z. Safely reducing manual urine microscopy analyses by combining urine flow cytometer and strip results. Am J Clin Pathol 2001;116:872-8.
25. Apeland T, Mestad O, Hetland O. Assessment of haematuria: automated urine flowmetry vs microscopy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;16:1615-9.
26. Gai M, Piccoli GB, Segoloni GP, Lanfranco G. Microscopic urinalysis and automated flow cytometry in a nephrology laboratory. Clin Chem 2003;49:1559-60.
27. Ottiger C, Huber AR. Quantitative urine particle analysis: integrative approach for the optimal combination of automation with UF-100 and microscopic review with KOVA cell chamber. Clin Chem 2003;49:617-23.
28. Roe CE, Carlson DA, Daigneault RW, Statland BE. Evaluation of the Yellow IRIS. An automated method for urinalysis. Am J Clin Pathol 1986;86:661-5.
29. Ben-Ezra J, Bork L, McPherson RA. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer. Clin Chem 1998;44:92-5.
30. Fenili D, Pirovano B. The automation of sediment urinalysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100). Clin Chem Lab Med 1998;36:909-17.
31. Delanghe JR, Kouri TT, Huber AR, Hannemann-Pohl K, Guder WG, Lun A, et al. The role of automated urine particle flow cytometry in clinical practice. Clin Chim Acta 2000;301:1-18.
32. Wah DT, Wises PK, Butch AW. Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers. Am J Clin Pathol 2005;123:290-6.
33. Langlois MR, Delanghe JR, Steyaert SR, Everaert KC, De Buyzere ML. Automated flow cytometry compared with an automated dipstick reader for urinalysis. Clin Chem 1999;45:118-22.
34. Hughes C, Roebuck MJ. Evaluation of the IRIS 939 UDx flow microscope as a screening system for urinary tract infection. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:844-9.
35. Kohler H, Wandel E, Brunck B. Acanthocyturia - a characteristic marker for glomerular bleeding. Kidney Int 1991;40:115-20.
36. Ottiger C, Regeniter A, Kochli HP, Huber AR. [Standardized counting of particles in the urine: a comparison between flow cytometry, cell chamber counting and traditional sediment analysis]. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 2004;93:15-21.
37. Yasui Y, Tatsumi N, Park K, Koezuka T. Urinary sediment analyzed by flow cytometry. Cytometry 1995;22:75-9.