Predicting the lethal phenotype of the knockout mouse by integrating comprehensive genomic data

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1246-1252

  Yuan, Yuan ^a,b   Xu, Yanxun ^c   Xu, Jianfeng ^d   Ball, Robyn L ^e   Liang, Han ^b  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^c Rice University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^e TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAMMALIA; MUS;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GENETICS; HUMAN; LETHAL GENE; MOUSE; MOUSE MUTANT; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; GENES, LETHAL; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MODELS, ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84860439224     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts120     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barabasi, A.L. and Oltvai, Z.N. (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet., 5, 101-113.
2. Birney, E. et al. (2007) Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature, 447, 799-816.
3. Breiman, L. (2001) Random forests. Machine Learn. 45, 5-32.
4. Bureau, A. et al. (2005) Identifying SNPs predictive of phenotype using random forests. Genet. Epidemiol., 28, 171-182.
5. Cai, J.J. et al. (2009) Similarly strong purifying selection acts on human disease genes of all evolutionary ages. Genome Biol. Evol., 1, 131-144.
6. Collins, F.S. et al. (2007) A mouse for all reasons. Cell, 128, 9-13.
7. Cox, A. et al. (2009) A new standard genetic map for the laboratory mouse. Genetics, 182, 1335-1344.
8. Finger, J.H. et al. (2011) The mouse Gene Expression Database (GXD): 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D835-D841.
9. Flicek, P. et al. (2011) Ensembl 2011. Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D800-D806.
10. Friedman, J. et al. (2010) Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw., 33, 1-22.
11. Gasteiger, E. et al. (2003) ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3784-3788.
12. Ghosh, D. and Chinnaiyan, A.M. (2005) Classification and selection of biomarkers in genomic data using LASSO. J Biomed. Biotechnol., 2005, 147-154.
13. Gu, Z. et al. (2003) Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations. Nature, 421, 63-66.
14. Guan, Y. et al. (2008) Predicting gene function in a hierarchical context with an ensemble of classifiers. Genome Biol., 9 (Suppl. 1), S3.
15. Hughes, T.R. and Roth, F.P. (2008) A race through the maze of genomic evidence. Genome Biol., 9 (Suppl. 1), S1.
16. Jeong, H. et al. (2001) Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature, 411, 41-42.
17. Keshava Prasad, T.S. et al. (2009) Human Protein Reference Database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D767-D772.
18. Knight, K. and Fu, W. (2000) Asymptotics for Lasso-type estimators. Ann. Stat., 28, 1356-1378.
19. Lewis, B.P. et al. (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell, 120, 15-20.
20. Liang, H. and Li, W.H. (2007) Gene essentiality, gene duplicability and protein connectivity in human and mouse. Trends Genet., 23, 375-378.
21. Liang, H. and Li, W.H. (2009) Functional compensation by duplicated genes in mouse. Trends Genet., 25, 441-442.
22. Liao, B.Y. and Zhang, J. (2007) Mouse duplicate genes are as essential as singletons. Trends Genet., 23, 378-381.
23. Liao, B.Y. and Zhang, J. (2008) Null mutations in human and mouse orthologs frequently result in different phenotypes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105, 6987-6992.
24. Liao, B.Y. et al. (2006) Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol., 23, 2072-2080.
25. Makino, T. et al. (2009) The complex relationship of gene duplication and essentiality. Trends Genet., 25, 152-155.
26. Mostafavi, S. et al. (2008) GeneMANIA: a real-time multiple association network integration algorithm for predicting gene function. Genome Biol., 9 (Suppl. 1), S4.
27. Peden, J.F. (1999) Analysis of Codon Usage. Department of Genetics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
28. Pena-Castillo, L. et al. (2008) A critical assessment of Mus musculus gene function prediction using integrated genomic evidence. Genome Biol., 9 (Suppl. 1), S2.
29. Rost, B. and Sander, C. (1994) Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins, 19, 55-72.
30. Schöklkopf, B. et al. (1997) Comparing support vector machines with Gaussian kernels to radial basis function classi?ers. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 45, 2758-2765.
31. Seringhaus, M. et al. (2006) Predicting essential genes in fungal genomes. Genome Res., 16, 1126-1135.
32. Shevade, S.K. and Keerthi, S.S. (2003)Asimple and efficient algorithm for gene selection using sparse logistic regression. Bioinformatics, 19, 2246-2253.
33. Su, A.I. et al. (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 6062-6067.
34. Tasan, M. et al. (2008) An en masse phenotype and function prediction system for Mus musculus. Genome Biol., 9 (Suppl. 1), S8.
35. Tibshirani, R. (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 58, 267-288.
36. Yang, Z.R. et al. (2005) RONN: the bio-basis function neural network technique applied to the detection of natively disordered regions in proteins. Bioinformatics, 21, 3369-3376.