Introducing taxes, subsidies or both: The effects of various food pricing strategies in a web-based supermarket randomized trial

Preventive Medicine

Volumn 54, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 323-330

  Waterlander, Wilma E ^a,d   Steenhuis, Ingrid H M ^a,d   de Boer, Michiel R ^a,b,d   Schuit, Albertine J ^a,c,d   Seidell, Jacob C ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Economics; Financial support; Food; Health behavior; Health policy; Intervention studies; Nutrition policy; Randomized controlled trial; Taxes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALORIE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; DIETARY INTAKE; FOOD; HEALTH FOOD; HUMAN; INTERNET; NETHERLANDS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TAX; VEGETABLE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMERCE; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; FOOD PREFERENCES; FOOD SUPPLY; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; NUTRITION POLICY; TAXES; VEGETABLES;

EID: 84860435221     PISSN: 00917435     EISSN: 10960260     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Albert Heijn Online Shop (AH Webwinkel) Groceries (boodschappen) URL:, Retrieved 12 November 2010. http://webwinkel.ah.nl/.
2. Anderson E.T., Simester D.I. The role of sale signs. Mark. Sci. 1998, 17:139-155.
3. Andreyeva T., Long M.W., Brownell K.D. The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100:216-222.
4. Blattberg R.C., Briesch R., Fox E.J. How promotions work. Mark. Sci. 1995, 14:G122-G132.
5. Caraher M., Cowburn G. Taxing food: implications for public health nutrition. Public Health Nutr. 2005, 8:1242-1249.
6. Central Planning Office (Centraal Planbureau (CPB)) Standard income (Modaal inkomen) Retrieved 04-06-2010, from. http://www.cpb.nl/nl/prognoses/nlinfo.html.
7. Chetty R., Looney A., Kroft K. Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 2009, 99:1145-1177.
8. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey. 2nd ed.
9. Darmon N., Drewnowski A. Does social class predict diet quality?. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 87:1107-1117.
10. Dotsch-Klerk M., Jansen L. The Choices programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 17(Suppl 1):383-386.
11. Epstein L.H., Dearing K.K., Roba L.G., et al. The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:406-414.
12. Faulkner G., Grootendorst P., Nguyen V.H., et al. Economic instruments for obesity prevention: results of a scoping review and modified Delphi survey. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2011, 8. 10.1186/1479-5868-1188-1109.
13. Finkelstein E., French S., Variyam J.N., et al. Pros and cons of proposed interventions to promote healthy eating. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2004, 27(3 Suppl):163-171.
14. French S.A. Pricing effects on food choices. J. Nutr. 2003, 133:841S-843S.
15. Giesen J.C., Payne C.R., Havermans R.C., et al. Exploring how calorie information and taxes on high-calorie foods influence lunch decisions. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 10.3945/ajcn.110.008193.
16. Giesen J.C., Havermans R.C., Nederkoorn C., et al. Impulsivity in the supermarket: responses to calorie taxes and subsidies in healthy weight undergraduates. Appetite 2011, 10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.026.
17. Hawkes C. Dietary implications of supermarket development: a global perspective. Dev. Policy Rev. 2008, 26:657-692.
18. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases 2003, WHO, Geneva.
19. Lacaniloa R.D., Cash S.B., Adamowisz W.L. Heterogeneous consumer responses to snack food taxes and warning labels. J. Consum. Aff. 2011, 45:108-122.
20. Leicester A., Windmeijer F. The "Fat Tax" Economic Incentives to Reduce Obesity, Briefing Note No. 49 2004, The institute for fiscal studies, London.
21. Lichtenstein D.R., Ridgway N.M., Netemeyer R.G. Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: a field study. J. Mark. Res. 1993, 30:234-245.
22. Main Trading Organisation Retail Trade (Hoofdbedrijfschap detailhandel) Spending and market share supermarkets Retrieved April 14th 2011, from. http://www.hbd.nl/pages/14/Bestedingen-en-marktaandelen/Supermarkten.html?branche_id=30&hoofdonderwerp_id=14.
23. McLaughlin E.W. The dynamics of fresh fruit and vegetable pricing in the supermarket channel. Prev. Med. 2004, 39(Suppl 2):S81-S87.
24. Mytton O., Gray A., Rayner M., et al. Could targeted food taxes improve health?. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2007, 61:689-694.
25. Nederkoorn C., Havermans R.C., Giesen J.C., et al. High tax on high energy dense foods and its effects on the purchase of calories in a supermarket: an experiment. Appetite 2011, 56:760-765.
26. Ni Mhurchu C. Food costs and healthful diets: the need for solution-oriented research and policies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 92:1007-1008.
27. Ni Mhurchu C., Blakely T., Jiang Y., et al. Effects of price discounts and tailored nutrition education on supermarket purchases: a randomized controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 9:736-747.
28. Nnoaham K.E., Sacks G., Rayner M., et al. Modelling income group differences in the health and economic impacts of targeted food taxes and subsidies. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 38:1324-1333.
29. Nordstrom J., Thunstrom L. The impact of tax reforms designed to encourage healthier grain consumption. J. Health Econ. 2009, 28:622-634.
30. Nordstrom J., Thunstrom L. Can targeted food taxes and subsidies improve the diet? Distributional effects among income groups. Food Policy 2011, 36:259-271.
31. Perloff J.M. Microeconomics 2007, Pearson Education, Boston. 4 ed.
32. Powell L.M., Chaloupka F.J. Food prices and obesity: evidence and policy implications for taxes and subsidies. Milbank Q. 2009, 87:229-257.
33. Roodenburg A.J.C., Popkin B.M., Seidell J.C. Development of international criteria for a front of package food labelling system: the international Choices programme. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 65:1190-1200.
34. Schmidhuber J., Traill W.B. The changing structure of diets in the European Union in relation to healthy eating guidelines. Public Health Nutr. 2006, 9:584-595.
35. Sharpe K.M., Staelin R., Huber J. Using extremeness aversion to fight obesity: policy implications of context dependent demand. J. Consum. Res. 2008, 35:406-422.
36. Steenhuis I.H., Waterlander W.E., de Mul A. Consumer food choices: the role of price and pricing strategies. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 1-7. doi: S1368980011001637.
37. Tiffin R., Arnoult M. The public health impacts of a fat tax. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 10.1038/ejcn.2010.281.
38. Tiffin R., Salois M. Inequalities in diet and nutrition. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2011, doi: S0029665111003284.
39. van Rossum C.T., Fransen H.P., Verkaik-Kloosterman H., et al. Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2007-2010 2011, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven.
40. Verplanken B., Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: a self-report index of habit strength. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 33:1313-1330.
41. Vorley B. Food, Inc.: Corporate Concentration from Farm to Consumer 2003, International Institute for Environment and Development, London.
42. Waterlander W.E., Steenhuis I.H., de Vet E., et al. Expert views on most suitable monetary incentives on food to stimulate healthy eating. Eur. J. Public Health 2010, 20:325-331.
43. Waterlander W.E., de Mul A., Schuit A.J., et al. Perceptions on the use of pricing strategies to stimulate healthy eating among residents of deprived neighbourhoods: a focus group study. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7. 10.1186/1479-5868-1187-1144.
44. Waterlander W.E., Scarpa M., Lentz D., et al. The virtual supermarket: an innovative research tool to study consumer food purchasing behaviour. BMC Public Health 2011, 11. doi: 1471-2458-11-58910.1186/1471-2458-11-589.
45. Waterlander WE, Steenhuis IHM, de Boer MR, Schuit AJ, Seidell JC, 2012. The effects of a 25% discount on fruits and vegetables: results of a randomized trial in a three-dimensional web-based supermarket. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9. doi:. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-11.
46. World Health Organization Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks 2009, WHO, Geneva.