How to promote generalisation in evolutionary robotics: The ProGAb approach

Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO'11

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 259-266

  Pinville, Tony ^a   Koos, Sylvain ^a   Mouret, Jean Baptiste ^a   Doncieux, Stéphane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

Author keywords

Algorithms

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; EVOLUTIONARY ROBOTICS; GENERALISATION; NAVIGATION TASKS; ROBOTIC TASKS; SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING;

ROBOTS;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 84860402460     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2001576.2001612     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. E. Alpaydin. Introduction to machine learning. MIT Press, 2004.
2. R. Barate and A. Manzanera. Generalization performance of vision based controllers for mobile robots evolved with genetic programming. Proc. of GECCO, 2008.
3. A. Berlanga, A. Sanchis, P. Isasi, and J. Molina. Neural Network Controller against Environment: A Coevolutive approach to Generalize Robot Navigation Behavior. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, pages 139-166, 2002. (Pubitemid 34288267)
4. T. Bersano-Begey and J. Daida. A discussion on generality and robustness and a framework for fitness set construction in genetic programming to promote robustness. In Proc. of GP, 1997.
5. M. Birattari, T. Stutzle, L. Paquete, and K. Varrentrapp. A racing algorithm for configuring metaheuristics. In Proc. of GECCO, 2002.
6. J. Bongard. Morphological change in machines accelerates the evolution of robust behavior. PNAS, 108(4):1234-1239, 2011.
7. J. Bongard and G. Hornby. Guarding against premature convergence while accelerating evolutionary search. Proc. of GECCO, 2010.
8. T. S. Braver, J. D. Cohen, and D. Servan-Schreiber. A computational model of prefrontal cortex function. NIPS, pages 141-148, 1995.
9. L. T. Bui, H. Abbass, and J. Branke. Multiobjective optimization for dynamic environments. Proc. of IEEE CEC, 2005.
10. K. Deb. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley and Sons, 2001.
11. E. Di Paolo. Homeostatic adaptation to inversion of the visual field and other sensorimotor disruptions. In From Animals to Animats 6: Proc. of SAB, 2000.
12. S. Doncieux and J.-B. Mouret. Behavioral diversity measures for Evolutionary Robotics. Proc. of IEEE CEC, 2010.
13. S. Doncieux, J.-B. Mouret, N. Bredeche, and V. Padois. Evolutionary Robotics: Exploring New Horizons, pages 3-25. Springer, 2011.
14. D. Floreano and J. Urzelai. Evolution of plastic control networks. Autonomous Robots, 11(3):311-317, 2001. (Pubitemid 33109980)
15. C. Gagné and M. Schoenauer. Genetic programming, validation sets, and parsimony pressure. Genetic Programming, pages 109-120, 2006. (Pubitemid 44011472)
16. V. Heidrich-Meisner and C. Igel. Hoeffding and Bernstein races for selecting policies in evolutionary direct policy search. Proc. of ICML, 2009.
17. T. Hemker, H. Sakamoto, M. Stelzer, and O. von Stryk. Hardware-in-the-loop optimization of the walking speed of a humanoid robot. In Proc. of CLAWAR, 2006.
18. N. Jakobi. Evolutionary robotics and the radical envelope-of-noise hypothesis. Adaptive Behavior, 6(2):325-368, 1997. (Pubitemid 127175215)
19. N. Jakobi, P. Husbands, and I. Harvey. Noise and the reality gap: The use of simulation in evolutionary robotics. Advances in Artificial Life, pages 704-720, 1995.
20. T. Kondo, A. Ishiguro, S. Tokura, Y. Uchikawa, and P. Eggenberger. Realization of robust controllers in evolutionary robotics: a dynamically-rearranging neural network approach. Proc. of IEEE CEC, 1999.
21. S. Koos, J.-B. Mouret, and S. Doncieux. Crossing the reality gap in evolutionary robotics by promoting transferable controllers. In Proc. of GECCO. ACM, 2010.
22. J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley. Abandoning Objectives: Evolution through the Search for Novelty Alone. Evolutionary Computation, pages 1-34, 2010.
23. J. H. R. Maes, B. M. Bouwman, and J. M. H. Vossen. Effects of d-amphetamine on the performance of rats in an animal analogue of the AX-CPT. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 15(1):23-28, 2001. (Pubitemid 32242100)
24. J. Meyer, P. Husbands, and I. Harvey. Evolutionary robotics: A survey of applications and problems. Evolutionary Robotics, pages 1-22, 1998.
25. O. Miglino, H. H. Lund, and S. Nolfi. Evolving mobile robots in simulated and real environments. Artificial Life, 2(4):417-434, 1995.
26. J.-B. Mouret and S. Doncieux. Using behavioral exploration objectives to solve deceptive problems in neuro-evolution. Proc. of GECCO, 2009.
27. J.-B. Mouret and S. Doncieux. Sferes v2: Evolvin' in the multi-core world. In Proc. of IEEE CEC, 2010.
28. T. G. Mueller, N. B. Pusuluri, K. K. Mathias, P. L. Cornelius, R. I. Barnhisel, and S. A. Shearer. Map quality for ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighted interpolation. SSSAJ, 68(6):2042-2047, 2004. (Pubitemid 39501190)
29. S. Nolfi and D. Floreano. Evolutionary Robotics: The Biology, Intelligence, and Technology of Self-Organizing Machines. MIT Press, 26(3), 2000.
30. L. Panait. Methods for evolving robust programs. Proc. of GECCO, 2003.
31. T. Pinville and S. Doncieux. Automatic Synthesis of Working memory neural networks with neuroevolution methods. In Neurocomp 2010, 2010.
32. A. Ratle. Accelerating the convergence of evolutionary algorithms by fitness landscape approximation. In Proc. of PPSN, 1998.
33. C. Reynolds. Evolution of corridor following behavior in a noisy world. In From Animals to Animats 3: Proc. of SAB, 1994.
34. R. M. Rylatt and C. A. Czarnecki. Embedding Connectionist Autonomous Agents in Time: The 'Road Sign Problem'. Neural Processing Letters, 12(2):145-158, 2000.
35. D. Shepard. A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In Proc. of the ACM national conference, 1968.
36. K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary Computation, 10(2):99-127, 2002.
37. A. Voutchkov and I. Keane. Multi-objective optimization using surrogates. Computational Intelligence in Optimization, pages 155-175, 2010.
38. T. Ziemke and M. Thieme. Neuromodulation of Reactive Sensorimotor Mappings as a Short-Term Memory Mechanism in Delayed Response Tasks. Adaptive Behavior, 10(3-4):185-199, 2002. (Pubitemid 36755297)